| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The stack allocated JsonLexContexts, in combination with codepaths
using goto, were causing warnings when compiling with LTO enabled
as the optimizer is unable to figure out that is safe. Rather than
contort the code with workarounds for this simply heap allocate the
structs instead as these are not in any performance critical paths.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2074634.1744839761@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
| |
Backpatch-through: 13
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 0785d1b8b adds support for libpq as a JSON client, but
allocations for string tokens can still be leaked during parsing
failures. This is tricky to fix for the object_field semantic callbacks:
the field name must remain valid until the end of the object, but if a
parsing error is encountered partway through, object_field_end() won't
be invoked and the client won't get a chance to free the field name.
This patch adds a flag to switch the ownership of parsed tokens to the
lexer. When this is enabled, the client must make a copy of any tokens
it wants to persist past the callback lifetime, but the lexer will
handle necessary cleanup on failure.
Backend uses of the JSON parser don't need to use this flag, since the
parser's allocations will occur in a short lived memory context.
A -o option has been added to test_json_parser_incremental to exercise
the new setJsonLexContextOwnsTokens() API, and the test_json_parser TAP
tests make use of it. (The test program now cleans up allocated memory,
so that tests can be usefully run under leak sanitizers.)
Author: Jacob Champion
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOYmi+kb38EciwyBQOf9peApKGwraHqA7pgzBkvoUnw5BRfS1g@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To make it more clear that these should never be modified.
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/54c29fb0-edf2-48ea-9814-44e918bbd6e8@iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Do this by opening the file in PG_BINARY_R mode. This prevents us from
getting wrong byte count from stat().
Per complaint from Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240707052030.r77hbdkid3mwksop@awork3.anarazel.de
Backpatch to rlease 17 where this code was introduced
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These probably should have been static all along, it was only
forgotten out of sloppiness.
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/e0a62134-83da-4ba4-8cdb-ceb0111c95ce@eisentraut.org
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
As in 9d7ded0f4277f5c0063eca8e871a34e2355a8371, it causes warnings on
some MinGW compilers.
|
| |
|
|
| |
As noticed by Michael Paquier.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
. Add missing copytight notices
. improve code coverage
. put work files in a temp directory in the standard location
. improve error checking in C code
. indent perl files with perltidy
. add some comments
per comments from Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZiC3-cdFys4-6xSk@paquier.xyz
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per gripes from Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZhTQ6_w1vwOhqTQI@paquier.xyz
Along the way, also clean up a handful of typos in 3311ea86ed and
ea7b4e9a2a, found by Alexander Lakhin, and a couple of stylistic
snafus noted by Daniel Westermann and Daniel Gustafsson.
|
|
|
This parser uses an explicit prediction stack, unlike the present
recursive descent parser where the parser state is represented on the
call stack. This difference makes the new parser suitable for use in
incremental parsing of huge JSON documents that cannot be conveniently
handled piece-wise by the recursive descent parser. One potential use
for this will be in parsing large backup manifests associated with
incremental backups.
Because this parser is somewhat slower than the recursive descent
parser, it is not replacing that parser, but is an additional parser
available to callers.
For testing purposes, if the build is done with -DFORCE_JSON_PSTACK, all
JSON parsing is done with the non-recursive parser, in which case only
trivial regression differences in error messages should be observed.
Author: Andrew Dunstan
Reviewed-By: Jacob Champion
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7b0a51d6-0d9d-7366-3a1a-f74397a02f55@dunslane.net
|
