| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Nowadays, all platforms except Windows and older HP-UX have standard
dlopen() support. So having a separate implementation per platform
under src/backend/port/dynloader/ is a bit excessive. Instead, treat
dlopen() like other library functions that happen to be missing
sometimes and put a replacement implementation under src/port/.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/e11a49cb-570a-60b7-707d-7084c8de0e61%402ndquadrant.com#54e735ae37476a121abb4e33c2549b03
|
|
|
|
| |
dlopen() has been documented since NetBSD 1.1 (1995).
|
|
|
|
| |
dlopen() has been documented since OpenBSD 2.0 (1996).
|
|
|
|
| |
dlopen() has been documented since FreeBSD 3.0 (1989).
|
|
|
|
| |
This has been obsolete probably since the late 1990s.
|
|
|
|
| |
not needed since macOS 10.3 (2003)
|
|
|
|
| |
Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.3
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NSUnLinkModule() doesn't take a bool as second argument but one of set
of specific constants. The numeric values are the same in this case,
but clean it up while we're cleaning up bool use elsewhere.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't move parenthesized lines to the left, even if that means they
flow past the right margin.
By default, BSD indent lines up statement continuation lines that are
within parentheses so that they start just to the right of the preceding
left parenthesis. However, traditionally, if that resulted in the
continuation line extending to the right of the desired right margin,
then indent would push it left just far enough to not overrun the margin,
if it could do so without making the continuation line start to the left of
the current statement indent. That makes for a weird mix of indentations
unless one has been completely rigid about never violating the 80-column
limit.
This behavior has been pretty universally panned by Postgres developers.
Hence, disable it with indent's new -lpl switch, so that parenthesized
lines are always lined up with the preceding left paren.
This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent
changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments
to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments
following #endif to not obey the general rule.
Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using
the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that
tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of
code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be
moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's
code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops
in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working
in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the
net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed
one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves
more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such
cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after
the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after.
Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same
as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else.
That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage
from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent.
This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent
changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
| |
From: Josh Soref <jsoref@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
c.h #includes a number of core libc header files, such as <stdio.h>.
There's no point in re-including these after having read postgres.h,
postgres_fe.h, or c.h; so remove code that did so.
While at it, also fix some places that were ignoring our standard pattern
of "include postgres[_fe].h, then system header files, then other Postgres
header files". While there's not any great magic in doing it that way
rather than system headers last, it's silly to have just a few files
deviating from the general pattern. (But I didn't attempt to enforce this
globally, only in files I was touching anyway.)
I'd be the first to say that this is mostly compulsive neatnik-ism,
but over time it might save enough compile cycles to be useful.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SCO OpenServer and SCO UnixWare are more or less dead platforms.
We have never had a buildfarm member testing the "sco" port, and
the last "unixware" member was last heard from in 2012, so it's
fair to doubt that the code even compiles anymore on either one.
Remove both ports. We can always undo this if someone shows up
with an interest in maintaining and testing these platforms.
Discussion: <17177.1476136994@sss.pgh.pa.us>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We weren't terribly consistent about whether to call Apple's OS "OS X"
or "Mac OS X", and the former is probably confusing to people who aren't
Apple users. Now that Apple has rebranded it "macOS", follow their lead
to establish a consistent naming pattern. Also, avoid the use of the
ancient project name "Darwin", except as the port code name which does not
seem desirable to change. (In short, this patch touches documentation and
comments, but no actual code.)
I didn't touch contrib/start-scripts/osx/, either. I suspect those are
obsolete and due for a rewrite, anyway.
I dithered about whether to apply this edit to old release notes, but
those were responsible for quite a lot of the inconsistencies, so I ended
up changing them too. Anyway, Apple's being ahistorical about this,
so why shouldn't we be?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Where possible, use palloc or pg_malloc instead; otherwise, insert
explicit NULL checks.
Generally speaking, these are places where an actual OOM is quite
unlikely, either because they're in client programs that don't
allocate all that much, or they're very early in process startup
so that we'd likely have had a fork() failure instead. Hence,
no back-patch, even though this is nominally a bug fix.
Michael Paquier, with some adjustments by me
Discussion: <CAB7nPqRu07Ot6iht9i9KRfYLpDaF2ZuUv5y_+72uP23ZAGysRg@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Backpatch certain files through 9.1
|
|
|
|
| |
Backpatch certain files through 9.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Support for running postgres on Alpha hasn't been tested for a long
while. Due to Alpha's uniquely lax cache coherency model it's a hard
to develop for platform (especially blindly!) and thought to be
unlikely to currently work correctly.
As Alpha is the only supported architecture for Tru64 drop support for
it as well. Tru64's support has ended 2012 and it has been in
maintenance-only mode for much longer.
Also remove stray references to __ksr__ and ultrix defines.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This includes removing tabs after periods in C comments, which was
applied to back branches, so this change should not effect backpatching.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Update all files in head, and files COPYRIGHT and legal.sgml in all back
branches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Development of IRIX has been discontinued, and support is scheduled
to end in December of 2013. Therefore, there will be no supported
versions of this operating system by the time PostgreSQL 9.4 is
released. Furthermore, we have no maintainer for this platform.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fully update git head, and update back branches in ./COPYRIGHT and
legal.sgml files.
|
|
|
|
| |
commit-fest.
|
|
|
|
| |
Postgres 9.2, and perhaps no existing users either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove the following ports:
- dgux
- nextstep
- sunos4
- svr4
- ultrix4
- univel
These are obsolete and not worth rescuing. In most cases, there is
circumstantial evidence that they wouldn't work anymore anyway.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For consistency, have all non-ASCII characters from contributors'
names in the source be in UTF-8. But remove some other more
gratuitous uses of non-ASCII characters.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove the hard-wired assumption that __mips__ (and only __mips__) lacks
dlopen in FreeBSD and OpenBSD. This assumption is outdated at least for
OpenBSD, as per report from an anonymous 9.1 tester. We can perfectly well
use HAVE_DLOPEN instead to decide which code to use.
Some other cosmetic adjustments to make freebsd.c, netbsd.c, and openbsd.c
exactly alike.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
provided by Andrew.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
using the system functions all the time. (These files are now just copies
of the osf.* files.) The homebrew functions were not getting used anyway
on AIX versions that have dlopen(), that is 4.3 and up, so they are not
needed on any AIX that is even remotely supported by the vendor anymore.
We'd have probably left them here anyway, except some questions were
raised about the copyright.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This particular batch was just for *.c and *.h file.
The changes were made with the following 2 commands:
find . \( \( -name 'libstemmer' -o -name 'expected' -o -name 'ppport.h' \) -prune \) -o \( -name '*.[ch]' \) \( -exec grep -q '\$PostgreSQL' {} \; -o -print \) | while read file ; do head -n 1 < $file | grep -q '^/\*' && echo $file; done | xargs -l sed -i -e '1s/^\// /' -e '1i/*\n * $PostgreSQL:$ \n *'
find . \( \( -name 'libstemmer' -o -name 'expected' -o -name 'ppport.h' \) -prune \) -o \( -name '*.[ch]' \) \( -exec grep -q '\$PostgreSQL' {} \; -o -print \) | xargs -l sed -i -e '1i/*\n * $PostgreSQL:$ \n */'
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
avoid this problem in the future.)
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
instructions from Berkeley.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Standard English uses "may", "can", and "might" in different ways:
may - permission, "You may borrow my rake."
can - ability, "I can lift that log."
might - possibility, "It might rain today."
Unfortunately, in conversational English, their use is often mixed, as
in, "You may use this variable to do X", when in fact, "can" is a better
choice. Similarly, "It may crash" is better stated, "It might crash".
|