| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was already true for CREATE EXTENSION, but historically has not
been true for other object types. Therefore, this is a backward
incompatibility. Per discussion on pgsql-hackers, everyone seems to
agree that the new behavior is better.
Marti Raudsepp, reviewed by Haribabu Kommi and myself
|
| |
|
|
| |
from Euler Taveira
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This makes it significantly easier to identify these lwlocks in
LWLOCK_STATS or Trace_lwlocks output. It's also arguably better
from a modularity standpoint, since lwlock.c no longer needs to
know anything about the LWLock needs of the higher-level SLRU
facility.
Ildus Kurbangaliev, reviewd by Álvaro Herrera and by me.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In addition, this path fills in a number of missing bits and pieces in
the parallel infrastructure. Paths and plans now have a parallel_aware
flag indicating whether whatever parallel-aware logic they have should
be engaged. It is believed that we will need this flag for a number of
path/plan types, not just sequential scans, which is why the flag is
generic rather than part of the SeqScan structures specifically.
Also, execParallel.c now gives parallel nodes a chance to initialize
their PlanState nodes from the DSM during parallel worker startup.
Amit Kapila, with a fair amount of adjustment by me. Review of previous
patch versions by Haribabu Kommi and others.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
The preferred spelling was changed from FORCE QUOTE to FORCE_QUOTE and
the like, but some code was still referring to the old spellings.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit d1b7c1ffe72e86932b5395f29e006c3f503bc53d introduced a mechanism
for serializing a ParamListInfo structure to be passed to a parallel
worker. However, this mechanism failed to handle external expanded
values, as pointed out by Noah Misch. Repair.
Moreover, plpgsql_param_fetch requires adjustment because the
serialization mechanism needs it to skip evaluating unused parameters
just as we would do when it is called from copyParamList, but params
== estate->paramLI in that case. To fix, make the bms_is_member test
in that function unconditional.
Finally, have setup_param_list set a new ParamListInfo field,
paramMask, to the parameters actually used in the expression, so that
we don't try to fetch those that are not needed when serializing a
parameter list. This isn't necessary for correctness, but it makes
the performance of the parallel executor code comparable to what we
do for cases involving cursors.
Design suggestions and extensive review by Noah Misch. Patch by me.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Message style, plurals, quoting, spelling, consistency with similar
messages
|
| |
|
|
| |
Amit Langote, per Etsuro Fujita
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Mistake introduced by commit 3bf3ab8c563699138be02f9dc305b7b77a724307.
Etsuro Fujita
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Further tweak commit_ts.c so that on a standby the state is completely
consistent with what that in the master, rather than behaving
differently in the cases that the settings differ. Now in standby and
master the module should always be active or inactive in lockstep.
Author: Petr Jelínek, with some further tweaks by Álvaro Herrera.
Backpatch to 9.5, where commit timestamps were introduced.
Discussion: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5622BF9D.2010409@2ndquadrant.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This way, we produce a better error message if someone tries to do
something like ALTER INDEX .. ALTER COLUMN .. SET STORAGE.
Amit Langote
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 816e336f12ecabdc834d4cc31bcf966b2dd323dc added the wrong error
check to async.c; sending restrictions is restricted to the leader,
not altogether unsafe.
Commit 3bd909b220930f21d6e15833a17947be749e7fde added ExecShutdownNode
to traverse the planstate tree and call shutdown functions, but made
a Gather node, the only node that actually has such a function, abort
the tree traversal, which is wrong.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 7aea8e4f2daa4b39ca9d1309a0c4aadb0f7ed81b was overoptimistic
about the degree of safety associated with running various functions
in parallel mode. Functions that take a table name or OID as an
argument are at least parallel-restricted, because the table might be
temporary, and we currently don't allow parallel workers to touch
temporary tables. Functions that take a query as an argument are
outright unsafe, because the query could be anything, including a
parallel-unsafe query.
Also, the queue of pending notifications is backend-private, so adding
to it from a worker doesn't behave correctly. We could fix this by
transferring the worker's queue of pending notifications to the master
during worker cleanup, but that seems like more trouble than it's
worth for now. In addition to adjusting the pg_proc.h markings, also
add an explicit check for this in async.c.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
check_role() tries to verify that the user has permission to become the
requested role, but this is inappropriate in a parallel worker, which
needs to exactly recreate the master's authorization settings. So skip
the check in that case.
This fixes a bug in commit 924bcf4f16d54c55310b28f77686608684734f42.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Author: Amit Langote
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To allow users to force RLS to always be applied, even for table owners,
add ALTER TABLE .. FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY.
row_security=off overrides FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY, to ensure pg_dump
output is complete (by default).
Also add SECURITY_NOFORCE_RLS context to avoid data corruption when
ALTER TABLE .. FORCE ROW SECURITY is being used. The
SECURITY_NOFORCE_RLS security context is used only during referential
integrity checks and is only considered in check_enable_rls() after we
have already checked that the current user is the owner of the relation
(which should always be the case during referential integrity checks).
Back-patch to 9.5 where RLS was added.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Without CASCADE, if an extension has an unfullfilled dependency on
another extension, CREATE EXTENSION ERRORs out with "required extension
... is not installed". That is annoying, especially when that dependency
is an implementation detail of the extension, rather than something the
extension's user can make sense of.
In addition to CASCADE this also includes a small set of regression
tests around CREATE EXTENSION.
Author: Petr Jelinek, editorialized by Michael Paquier, Andres Freund
Reviewed-By: Michael Paquier, Andres Freund, Jeff Janes
Discussion: 557E0520.3040800@2ndquadrant.com
|
| |
|
|
| |
Not a lot of commentary needed here really.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If some existing listener is far behind, incoming new listener sessions
would start from that session's read pointer and then need to advance over
many already-committed notification messages, which they have no interest
in. This was expensive in itself and also thrashed the pg_notify SLRU
buffers a lot more than necessary. We can improve matters considerably
in typical scenarios, without much added cost, by starting from the
furthest-ahead read pointer, not the furthest-behind one. We do have to
consider only sessions in our own database when doing this, which requires
an extra field in the data structure, but that's a pretty small cost.
Back-patch to 9.0 where the current LISTEN/NOTIFY logic was introduced.
Matt Newell, slightly adjusted by me
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A Gather executor node runs any number of copies of a plan in an equal
number of workers and merges all of the results into a single tuple
stream. It can also run the plan itself, if the workers are
unavailable or haven't started up yet. It is intended to work with
the Partial Seq Scan node which will be added in future commits.
It could also be used to implement parallel query of a different sort
by itself, without help from Partial Seq Scan, if the single_copy mode
is used. In that mode, a worker executes the plan, and the parallel
leader does not, merely collecting the worker's results. So, a Gather
node could be inserted into a plan to split the execution of that plan
across two processes. Nested Gather nodes aren't currently supported,
but we might want to add support for that in the future.
There's nothing in the planner to actually generate Gather nodes yet,
so it's not quite time to break out the champagne. But we're getting
close.
Amit Kapila. Some designs suggestions were provided by me, and I also
reviewed the patch. Single-copy mode, documentation, and other minor
changes also by me.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We seem to have lost a line somewhere along the way in the comment block
that discusses async.c's locks, because it suddenly refers to "both locks"
without previously having mentioned more than one. Add a sentence to make
that read more sanely. Also, refer to the "pos of the slowest backend"
not the "tail of the slowest backend", since we have no per-backend value
called "tail".
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
While at it, trim the includes list in copy.c. The planner headers
cannot be removed, but there are a few others that are not of any use.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In 9.5 and master there is no need to support legacy truncation. This is
just committed separately to make it easier to backpatch the WAL logged
multixact truncation to 9.3 and 9.4 if we later decide to do so.
I bumped master's magic from 0xD086 to 0xD088 and 9.5's from 0xD085 to
0xD087 to avoid 9.5 reusing a value that has been in use on master while
keeping the numbers increasing between major versions.
Discussion: 20150621192409.GA4797@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 9.5
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The fact that multixact truncations are not WAL logged has caused a fair
share of problems. Amongst others it requires to do computations during
recovery while the database is not in a consistent state, delaying
truncations till checkpoints, and handling members being truncated, but
offset not.
We tried to put bandaids on lots of these issues over the last years,
but it seems time to change course. Thus this patch introduces WAL
logging for multixact truncations.
This allows:
1) to perform the truncation directly during VACUUM, instead of delaying it
to the checkpoint.
2) to avoid looking at the offsets SLRU for truncation during recovery,
we can just use the master's values.
3) simplify a fair amount of logic to keep in memory limits straight,
this has gotten much easier
During the course of fixing this a bunch of additional bugs had to be
fixed:
1) Data was not purged from memory the member's SLRU before deleting
segments. This happened to be hard or impossible to hit due to the
interlock between checkpoints and truncation.
2) find_multixact_start() relied on SimpleLruDoesPhysicalPageExist - but
that doesn't work for offsets that haven't yet been flushed to
disk. Add code to flush the SLRUs to fix. Not pretty, but it feels
slightly safer to only make decisions based on actual on-disk state.
3) find_multixact_start() could be called concurrently with a truncation
and thus fail. Via SetOffsetVacuumLimit() that could lead to a round
of emergency vacuuming. The problem remains in
pg_get_multixact_members(), but that's quite harmless.
For now this is going to only get applied to 9.5+, leaving the issues in
the older branches in place. It is quite possible that we need to
backpatch at a later point though.
For the case this gets backpatched we need to handle that an updated
standby may be replaying WAL from a not-yet upgraded primary. We have to
recognize that situation and use "old style" truncation (i.e. looking at
the SLRUs) during WAL replay. In contrast to before, this now happens in
the startup process, when replaying a checkpoint record, instead of the
checkpointer. Doing truncation in the restartpoint is incorrect, they
can happen much later than the original checkpoint, thereby leading to
wraparound. To avoid "multixact_redo: unknown op code 48" errors
standbys would have to be upgraded before primaries.
A later patch will bump the WAL page magic, and remove the legacy
truncation codepaths. Legacy truncation support is just included to make
a possible future backpatch easier.
Discussion: 20150621192409.GA4797@alap3.anarazel.de
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas, Alvaro Herrera, Thomas Munro
Backpatch: 9.5 for now
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, ANALYZE simply ignored columns of datatypes that have neither
a btree nor hash opclass (which means they have no recognized equality
operator). Without a notion of equality, we can't identify most-common
values nor estimate the number of distinct values. But we can still
count nulls and compute the average physical column width, and those
stats might be of value. Moreover there are some tools out there that
don't work so well if rows are missing from pg_statistic. So let's
add suitable logic for this case.
While this is arguably a bug fix, it also has the potential to change
query plans, and the gain seems not worth taking a risk of that in
stable branches. So back-patch into 9.5 but not further.
Oleksandr Shulgin, rewritten a bit by me.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ExplainPreScanNode knows how to iterate over a generic tree of plan
states; factor that logic out into a separate walker function so that
other code, such as upcoming patches for parallel query, can also use
it.
Patch by me, reviewed by Tom Lane.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 924bcf4f16d54c55310b28f77686608684734f42 introduced a framework
for parallel computation in PostgreSQL that makes most but not all
built-in functions safe to execute in parallel mode. In order to have
parallel query, we'll need to be able to determine whether that query
contains functions (either built-in or user-defined) that cannot be
safely executed in parallel mode. This requires those functions to be
labeled, so this patch introduces an infrastructure for that. Some
functions currently labeled as safe may need to be revised depending on
how pending issues related to heavyweight locking under paralllelism
are resolved.
Parallel plans can't be used except for the case where the query will
run to completion. If portal execution were suspended, the parallel
mode restrictions would need to remain in effect during that time, but
that might make other queries fail. Therefore, this patch introduces
a framework that enables consideration of parallel plans only when it
is known that the plan will be run to completion. This probably needs
some refinement; for example, at bind time, we do not know whether a
query run via the extended protocol will be execution to completion or
run with a limited fetch count. Having the client indicate its
intentions at bind time would constitute a wire protocol break. Some
contexts in which parallel mode would be safe are not adjusted by this
patch; the default is not to try parallel plans except from call sites
that have been updated to say that such plans are OK.
This commit doesn't introduce any parallel paths or plans; it just
provides a way to determine whether they could potentially be used.
I'm committing it on the theory that the remaining parallel sequential
scan patches will also get committed to this release, hopefully in the
not-too-distant future.
Robert Haas and Amit Kapila. Reviewed (in earlier versions) by Noah
Misch.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This refactors rewrite/rowsecurity.c to simplify the handling of the
default deny case (reducing the number of places where we check for and
add the default deny policy from three to one) by splitting up the
retrival of the policies from the application of them.
This also allowed us to do away with the policy_id field. A policy_name
field was added for WithCheckOption policies and is used in error
reporting, when available.
Patch by Dean Rasheed, with various mostly cosmetic changes by me.
Back-patch to 9.5 where RLS was introduced to avoid unnecessary
differences, since we're still in alpha, per discussion with Robert.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This has been broken since 9.3 (commit 82b1b213cad3a69c to be exact),
which suggests that nobody is any longer using a Windows build system that
doesn't provide a symlink emulation. Still, it's wrong on its own terms,
so repair.
YUriy Zhuravlev
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Formerly, we treated only portals created in the current subtransaction as
having failed during subtransaction abort. However, if the error occurred
while running a portal created in an outer subtransaction (ie, a cursor
declared before the last savepoint), that has to be considered broken too.
To allow reliable detection of which ones those are, add a bookkeeping
field to struct Portal that tracks the innermost subtransaction in which
each portal has actually been executed. (Without this, we'd end up
failing portals containing functions that had called the subtransaction,
thereby breaking plpgsql exception blocks completely.)
In addition, when we fail an outer-subtransaction Portal, transfer its
resources into the subtransaction's resource owner, so that they're
released early in cleanup of the subxact. This fixes a problem reported by
Jim Nasby in which a function executed in an outer-subtransaction cursor
could cause an Assert failure or crash by referencing a relation created
within the inner subtransaction.
The proximate cause of the Assert failure is that AtEOSubXact_RelationCache
assumed it could blow away a relcache entry without first checking that the
entry had zero refcount. That was a bad idea on its own terms, so add such
a check there, and to the similar coding in AtEOXact_RelationCache. This
provides an independent safety measure in case there are still ways to
provoke the situation despite the Portal-level changes.
This has been broken since subtransactions were invented, so back-patch
to all supported branches.
Tom Lane and Michael Paquier
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Merlin Moncure
Backpatch to 9.5, where the misspelling was introduced
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To avoid confusion, rename CreatePolicyStmt's 'cmd' to 'cmd_name',
parse_policy_command's 'cmd' to 'polcmd', and AlterPolicy's 'cmd_datum'
to 'polcmd_datum', per discussion with Noah and as a follow-up to his
correction of copynodes/equalnodes handling of the CreatePolicyStmt
'cmd' field.
Back-patch to 9.5 where the CreatePolicyStmt was introduced, as we
are still only in alpha.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When reworking bypassrls in AlterRole to operate the same way the other
attribute handling is done, I missed that the variable was incorrectly a
bool rather than an int. This meant that on platforms with an unsigned
char, we could end up with incorrect behavior during ALTER ROLE.
Pointed out by Andres thanks to tests he did changing our bool to be the
one from stdbool.h which showed this and a number of other issues.
Add regression tests to test CREATE/ALTER role for the various role
attributes. Arrange to leave roles behind for testing pg_dumpall, but
none which have the LOGIN attribute.
Back-patch to 9.5 where the AlterRole bug exists.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a bunch of somewhat pedantic warnings with new
compilers. Since by far the majority of other functions definitions use
the (void) style it just seems to be consistent to do so as well in the
remaining few places.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reduce lock levels down to ShareUpdateExclusiveLock for all autovacuum-related
relation options when setting them using ALTER TABLE.
Add infrastructure to allow varying lock levels for relation options in later
patches. Setting multiple options together uses the highest lock level required
for any option. Works for both main and toast tables.
Fabrízio Mello, reviewed by Michael Paquier, mild edit and additional regression
tests from myself
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's against project policy to use elog() for user-facing errors, or to
omit an errcode() selection for errors that aren't supposed to be "can't
happen" cases. Fix all the violations of this policy that result in
ERRCODE_INTERNAL_ERROR log entries during the standard regression tests,
as errors that can reliably be triggered from SQL surely should be
considered user-facing.
I also looked through all the files touched by this commit and fixed
other nearby problems of the same ilk. I do not claim to have fixed
all violations of the policy, just the ones in these files.
In a few places I also changed existing ERRCODE choices that didn't
seem particularly appropriate; mainly replacing ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR
by something more specific.
Back-patch to 9.5, but no further; changing ERRCODE assignments in
stable branches doesn't seem like a good idea.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Fabrízio de Royes Mello, reviewed by Payal Singh, Alvaro Herrera and
Michael Paquier.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Policy USING and WITH CHECK expressions were using EXPR_KIND_WHERE for
parse analysis, which results in inappropriate ERROR messages when
the expression contains unsupported constructs such as aggregates.
Create a new ParseExprKind called EXPR_KIND_POLICY and tailor the
related messages to fit.
Reported by Noah Misch. Reviewed by Dean Rasheed, Alvaro Herrera,
and Robert Haas. Back-patch to 9.5 where RLS was introduced.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
AlterPolicy() and CreatePolicy() lacked their respective hook invocations.
Noted by Noah Misch, review by Dean Rasheed. Back-patch to 9.5 where
RLS was introduced.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Amit Langote
|
| |
|
|
| |
Also re-pgindent, just because I'm a neatnik.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When DefineQueryRewrite() is about to convert a table to a view, it checks
the table for features unavailable to views. For example, it rejects tables
having triggers. It omits to reject tables having relrowsecurity or a
pg_policy record. Fix that. To faciliate the repair, invent
relation_has_policies() which indicates the presence of policies on a
relation even when row security is disabled for that relation.
Reported by Noah Misch. Patch by me, review by Stephen Frost. Back-patch
to 9.5 where RLS was introduced.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CreatePolicy() and AlterPolicy() omit to create a pg_shdepend entry for
each role in the TO clause. Fix this by creating a new shared dependency
type called SHARED_DEPENDENCY_POLICY and assigning it to each role.
Reported by Noah Misch. Patch by me, reviewed by Alvaro Herrera.
Back-patch to 9.5 where RLS was introduced.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To avoid a race condition where the relation being COPY'd could be
changed into a view or otherwise modified, keep the original lock
on the relation. Further, fully qualify the relation when building
the query up.
Also remove the poorly thought-out Assert() and check the entire
relationOids list as, post-RLS, there can certainly be multiple
relations involved and the planner does not guarantee their ordering.
Per discussion with Noah and Andres.
Back-patch to 9.5 where RLS was introduced.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The original implementation of TABLESAMPLE modeled the tablesample method
API on index access methods, which wasn't a good choice because, without
specialized DDL commands, there's no way to build an extension that can
implement a TSM. (Raw inserts into system catalogs are not an acceptable
thing to do, because we can't undo them during DROP EXTENSION, nor will
pg_upgrade behave sanely.) Instead adopt an API more like procedural
language handlers or foreign data wrappers, wherein the only SQL-level
support object needed is a single handler function identified by having
a special return type. This lets us get rid of the supporting catalog
altogether, so that no custom DDL support is needed for the feature.
Adjust the API so that it can support non-constant tablesample arguments
(the original coding assumed we could evaluate the argument expressions at
ExecInitSampleScan time, which is undesirable even if it weren't outright
unsafe), and discourage sampling methods from looking at invisible tuples.
Make sure that the BERNOULLI and SYSTEM methods are genuinely repeatable
within and across queries, as required by the SQL standard, and deal more
honestly with methods that can't support that requirement.
Make a full code-review pass over the tablesample additions, and fix
assorted bugs, omissions, infelicities, and cosmetic issues (such as
failure to put the added code stanzas in a consistent ordering).
Improve EXPLAIN's output of tablesample plans, too.
Back-patch to 9.5 so that we don't have to support the original API
in production.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was forgotten in cac76582053e (and its fixup ad89a5d115). Since it
seems way too easy to miss this, this commit also introduces a mechanism
to enforce that the array is consistent with the enum.
Problem reported independently by Robert Haas and Jaimin Pan.
Patches proposed by Jaimin Pan, Jim Nasby, Michael Paquier and myself,
though I didn't use any of these and instead went with a cleaner
approach suggested by Tom Lane.
Backpatch to 9.5.
Discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+Tgmoa6SgDaxW_n_7SEhwBAc=mniYga+obUj5fmw4rU9_mLvA@mail.gmail.com
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/29788.1437411581@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since those role specifiers are checked in the grammar, there's no need
for the old checks to remain in place after 31eae6028ec. Remove them.
Backpatch to 9.5.
Noted and patch by Jeevan Chalke
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This tells you what fraction of NOTIFY's queue is currently filled.
Brendan Jurd, reviewed by Merlin Moncure and Gurjeet Singh. A few
further tweaks by me.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Also, the lock on pg_operator should not be released until end of
transaction.
|
