aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/contrib/btree_gist/btree_uuid.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Add support for sorted gist index builds to btree_gistHeikki Linnakangas2025-04-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This enables sortsupport in the btree_gist extension for faster builds of gist indexes. Sorted gist index build strategy is the new default now. Regression tests are unchanged (except for one small change in the 'enum' test to add coverage for enum values added later) and are using the sorted build strategy instead. One version of this was committed a long time ago already, in commit 9f984ba6d2, but it was quickly reverted because of buildfarm failures. The failures were presumably caused by some small bugs, but we never got around to debug and commit it again. This patch was written from scratch, implementing the same idea, with some fragments and ideas from the original patch. Author: Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de> Author: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/64d324ce2a6d535d3f0f3baeeea7b25beff82ce4.camel@oopsware.de
* Fix boilerplate comments in btree_gistHeikki Linnakangas2025-04-03
| | | | | | | | | A few of these were copy-pasted wrong, like the comment "Bytea ops" in btree_numeric.c. Instead of fixing the incorrect ones, replace them all with generic comment "GiST support functions". Also tidy up the inconsistent newlines between various functions while we're at it.
* Remove useless casts to (void *)Peter Eisentraut2024-11-28
| | | | | | | | Many of them just seem to have been copied around for no real reason. Their presence causes (small) risks of hiding actual type mismatches or silently discarding qualifiers Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/461ea37c-8b58-43b4-9736-52884e862820@eisentraut.org
* Remove useless casts to (void *) in arguments of some system functionsPeter Eisentraut2023-02-07
| | | | | | | | The affected functions are: bsearch, memcmp, memcpy, memset, memmove, qsort, repalloc Reviewed-by: Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/fd9adf5d-b1aa-e82f-e4c7-263c30145807%40enterprisedb.com
* Revert "Add sortsupport for gist_btree opclasses, for faster index builds."Heikki Linnakangas2021-04-07
| | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit 9f984ba6d23dc6eecebf479ab1d3f2e550a4e9be. It was making the buildfarm unhappy, apparently setting client_min_messages in a regression test produces different output if log_statement='all'. Another issue is that I now suspect the bit sortsupport function was in fact not correct to call byteacmp(). Revert to investigate both of those issues.
* Add sortsupport for gist_btree opclasses, for faster index builds.Heikki Linnakangas2021-04-07
| | | | | | | | | Commit 16fa9b2b30 introduced a faster way to build GiST indexes, by sorting all the data. This commit adds the sortsupport functions needed to make use of that feature for btree_gist. Author: Andrey Borodin Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2F3F7265-0D22-44DB-AD71-8554C743D943@yandex-team.ru
* Clean up newlines following left parenthesesAlvaro Herrera2020-01-30
| | | | | | | | | | | | We used to strategically place newlines after some function call left parentheses to make pgindent move the argument list a few chars to the left, so that the whole line would fit under 80 chars. However, pgindent no longer does that, so the newlines just made the code vertically longer for no reason. Remove those newlines, and reflow some of those lines for some extra naturality. Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200129200401.GA6303@alvherre.pgsql
* Change TRUE/FALSE to true/falsePeter Eisentraut2017-11-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The lower case spellings are C and C++ standard and are used in most parts of the PostgreSQL sources. The upper case spellings are only used in some files/modules. So standardize on the standard spellings. The APIs for ICU, Perl, and Windows define their own TRUE and FALSE, so those are left as is when using those APIs. In code comments, we use the lower-case spelling for the C concepts and keep the upper-case spelling for the SQL concepts. Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
* Extend & revamp pg_bswap.h infrastructure.Andres Freund2017-09-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Upcoming patches are going to address performance issues that involve slow system provided ntohs/htons etc. To address that expand pg_bswap.h to provide pg_ntoh{16,32,64}, pg_hton{16,32,64} and optimize their respective implementations by using compiler intrinsics for gcc compatible compilers and msvc. Fall back to manual implementations using shifts etc otherwise. Additionally remove multiple evaluation hazards from the existing BSWAP32/64 macros, by replacing them with inline functions when necessary. In the course of that the naming scheme is changed to pg_bswap16/32/64. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170927172019.gheidqy6xvlxb325@alap3.anarazel.de
* Phase 3 of pgindent updates.Tom Lane2017-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Don't move parenthesized lines to the left, even if that means they flow past the right margin. By default, BSD indent lines up statement continuation lines that are within parentheses so that they start just to the right of the preceding left parenthesis. However, traditionally, if that resulted in the continuation line extending to the right of the desired right margin, then indent would push it left just far enough to not overrun the margin, if it could do so without making the continuation line start to the left of the current statement indent. That makes for a weird mix of indentations unless one has been completely rigid about never violating the 80-column limit. This behavior has been pretty universally panned by Postgres developers. Hence, disable it with indent's new -lpl switch, so that parenthesized lines are always lined up with the preceding left paren. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Phase 2 of pgindent updates.Tom Lane2017-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Post-PG 10 beta1 pgindent runBruce Momjian2017-05-17
| | | | perltidy run not included.
* Use CallerFInfoFunctionCall with btree_gist for numeric typesAndrew Dunstan2017-03-21
| | | | | | | | | | None of the existing types actually need to use this mechanism, but this will allow support for enum types which will need it. A separate patch will adjust the varlena types support for consistency. Reviewed by Tom Lane and Anastasia Lubennikova Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/27220.1478360811@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Add uuid to the set of types supported by contrib/btree_gist.Tom Lane2016-11-29
Paul Jungwirth, reviewed and hacked on by Teodor Sigaev, Ildus Kurbangaliev, Adam Brusselback, Chris Bandy, and myself. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+renyUEE29=X01JXdz8_TQvo6n9=2XoEBBRnQ8rkLyr+kjPxQ@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/55F6EE82.8080209@sigaev.ru