aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/tcop/pquery.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/tcop/pquery.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/tcop/pquery.c27
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/tcop/pquery.c b/src/backend/tcop/pquery.c
index b5797042abc..960f3fadce5 100644
--- a/src/backend/tcop/pquery.c
+++ b/src/backend/tcop/pquery.c
@@ -480,7 +480,9 @@ PortalStart(Portal portal, ParamListInfo params,
* We could remember the snapshot in portal->portalSnapshot,
* but presently there seems no need to, as this code path
* cannot be used for non-atomic execution. Hence there can't
- * be any commit/abort that might destroy the snapshot.
+ * be any commit/abort that might destroy the snapshot. Since
+ * we don't do that, there's also no need to force a
+ * non-default nesting level for the snapshot.
*/
/*
@@ -1136,9 +1138,15 @@ PortalRunUtility(Portal portal, PlannedStmt *pstmt,
snapshot = RegisterSnapshot(snapshot);
portal->holdSnapshot = snapshot;
}
- /* In any case, make the snapshot active and remember it in portal */
- PushActiveSnapshot(snapshot);
- /* PushActiveSnapshot might have copied the snapshot */
+
+ /*
+ * In any case, make the snapshot active and remember it in portal.
+ * Because the portal now references the snapshot, we must tell
+ * snapmgr.c that the snapshot belongs to the portal's transaction
+ * level, else we risk portalSnapshot becoming a dangling pointer.
+ */
+ PushActiveSnapshotWithLevel(snapshot, portal->createLevel);
+ /* PushActiveSnapshotWithLevel might have copied the snapshot */
portal->portalSnapshot = GetActiveSnapshot();
}
else
@@ -1784,8 +1792,13 @@ EnsurePortalSnapshotExists(void)
elog(ERROR, "cannot execute SQL without an outer snapshot or portal");
Assert(portal->portalSnapshot == NULL);
- /* Create a new snapshot and make it active */
- PushActiveSnapshot(GetTransactionSnapshot());
- /* PushActiveSnapshot might have copied the snapshot */
+ /*
+ * Create a new snapshot, make it active, and remember it in portal.
+ * Because the portal now references the snapshot, we must tell snapmgr.c
+ * that the snapshot belongs to the portal's transaction level, else we
+ * risk portalSnapshot becoming a dangling pointer.
+ */
+ PushActiveSnapshotWithLevel(GetTransactionSnapshot(), portal->createLevel);
+ /* PushActiveSnapshotWithLevel might have copied the snapshot */
portal->portalSnapshot = GetActiveSnapshot();
}