aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepjointree.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepjointree.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepjointree.c164
1 files changed, 79 insertions, 85 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepjointree.c b/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepjointree.c
index 9624a4ad135..ece6133c144 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepjointree.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepjointree.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
- * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepjointree.c,v 1.30 2005/08/01 20:31:09 tgl Exp $
+ * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepjointree.c,v 1.31 2005/10/15 02:49:20 momjian Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@@ -143,8 +143,8 @@ pull_up_subqueries(PlannerInfo *root, Node *jtnode, bool below_outer_join)
Query *subquery = rte->subquery;
/*
- * Is this a subquery RTE, and if so, is the subquery simple
- * enough to pull up? (If not, do nothing at this node.)
+ * Is this a subquery RTE, and if so, is the subquery simple enough to
+ * pull up? (If not, do nothing at this node.)
*
* If we are inside an outer join, only pull up subqueries whose
* targetlists are nullable --- otherwise substituting their tlist
@@ -153,8 +153,8 @@ pull_up_subqueries(PlannerInfo *root, Node *jtnode, bool below_outer_join)
*
* XXX This could be improved by generating pseudo-variables for such
* expressions; we'd have to figure out how to get the pseudo-
- * variables evaluated at the right place in the modified plan
- * tree. Fix it someday.
+ * variables evaluated at the right place in the modified plan tree.
+ * Fix it someday.
*/
if (rte->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY &&
is_simple_subquery(subquery) &&
@@ -166,53 +166,53 @@ pull_up_subqueries(PlannerInfo *root, Node *jtnode, bool below_outer_join)
ListCell *rt;
/*
- * Need a modifiable copy of the subquery to hack on. Even if
- * we didn't sometimes choose not to pull up below, we must do
- * this to avoid problems if the same subquery is referenced
- * from multiple jointree items (which can't happen normally,
- * but might after rule rewriting).
+ * Need a modifiable copy of the subquery to hack on. Even if we
+ * didn't sometimes choose not to pull up below, we must do this
+ * to avoid problems if the same subquery is referenced from
+ * multiple jointree items (which can't happen normally, but might
+ * after rule rewriting).
*/
subquery = copyObject(subquery);
/*
* Create a PlannerInfo data structure for this subquery.
*
- * NOTE: the next few steps should match the first processing
- * in subquery_planner(). Can we refactor to avoid code
- * duplication, or would that just make things uglier?
+ * NOTE: the next few steps should match the first processing in
+ * subquery_planner(). Can we refactor to avoid code duplication,
+ * or would that just make things uglier?
*/
subroot = makeNode(PlannerInfo);
subroot->parse = subquery;
/*
- * Pull up any IN clauses within the subquery's WHERE, so that
- * we don't leave unoptimized INs behind.
+ * Pull up any IN clauses within the subquery's WHERE, so that we
+ * don't leave unoptimized INs behind.
*/
subroot->in_info_list = NIL;
if (subquery->hasSubLinks)
subquery->jointree->quals = pull_up_IN_clauses(subroot,
- subquery->jointree->quals);
+ subquery->jointree->quals);
/*
* Recursively pull up the subquery's subqueries, so that this
* routine's processing is complete for its jointree and
* rangetable.
*
- * Note: 'false' is correct here even if we are within an outer
- * join in the upper query; the lower query starts with a
- * clean slate for outer-join semantics.
+ * Note: 'false' is correct here even if we are within an outer join
+ * in the upper query; the lower query starts with a clean slate
+ * for outer-join semantics.
*/
subquery->jointree = (FromExpr *)
pull_up_subqueries(subroot, (Node *) subquery->jointree,
false);
/*
- * Now we must recheck whether the subquery is still simple
- * enough to pull up. If not, abandon processing it.
+ * Now we must recheck whether the subquery is still simple enough
+ * to pull up. If not, abandon processing it.
*
- * We don't really need to recheck all the conditions involved,
- * but it's easier just to keep this "if" looking the same as
- * the one above.
+ * We don't really need to recheck all the conditions involved, but
+ * it's easier just to keep this "if" looking the same as the one
+ * above.
*/
if (is_simple_subquery(subquery) &&
(!below_outer_join || has_nullable_targetlist(subquery)))
@@ -224,10 +224,10 @@ pull_up_subqueries(PlannerInfo *root, Node *jtnode, bool below_outer_join)
/*
* Give up, return unmodified RangeTblRef.
*
- * Note: The work we just did will be redone when the
- * subquery gets planned on its own. Perhaps we could
- * avoid that by storing the modified subquery back into
- * the rangetable, but I'm not gonna risk it now.
+ * Note: The work we just did will be redone when the subquery
+ * gets planned on its own. Perhaps we could avoid that by
+ * storing the modified subquery back into the rangetable, but
+ * I'm not gonna risk it now.
*/
return jtnode;
}
@@ -242,8 +242,8 @@ pull_up_subqueries(PlannerInfo *root, Node *jtnode, bool below_outer_join)
OffsetVarNodes((Node *) subroot->in_info_list, rtoffset, 0);
/*
- * Upper-level vars in subquery are now one level closer to
- * their parent than before.
+ * Upper-level vars in subquery are now one level closer to their
+ * parent than before.
*/
IncrementVarSublevelsUp((Node *) subquery, -1, 1);
IncrementVarSublevelsUp((Node *) subroot->in_info_list, -1, 1);
@@ -251,9 +251,8 @@ pull_up_subqueries(PlannerInfo *root, Node *jtnode, bool below_outer_join)
/*
* Replace all of the top query's references to the subquery's
* outputs with copies of the adjusted subtlist items, being
- * careful not to replace any of the jointree structure.
- * (This'd be a lot cleaner if we could use
- * query_tree_mutator.)
+ * careful not to replace any of the jointree structure. (This'd
+ * be a lot cleaner if we could use query_tree_mutator.)
*/
subtlist = subquery->targetList;
parse->targetList = (List *)
@@ -284,9 +283,9 @@ pull_up_subqueries(PlannerInfo *root, Node *jtnode, bool below_outer_join)
}
/*
- * Now append the adjusted rtable entries to upper query. (We
- * hold off until after fixing the upper rtable entries; no
- * point in running that code on the subquery ones too.)
+ * Now append the adjusted rtable entries to upper query. (We hold
+ * off until after fixing the upper rtable entries; no point in
+ * running that code on the subquery ones too.)
*/
parse->rtable = list_concat(parse->rtable, subquery->rtable);
@@ -295,8 +294,8 @@ pull_up_subqueries(PlannerInfo *root, Node *jtnode, bool below_outer_join)
* already adjusted the marker values, so just list_concat the
* list.)
*
- * Executor can't handle multiple FOR UPDATE/SHARE/NOWAIT flags,
- * so complain if they are valid but different
+ * Executor can't handle multiple FOR UPDATE/SHARE/NOWAIT flags, so
+ * complain if they are valid but different
*/
if (parse->rowMarks && subquery->rowMarks)
{
@@ -307,7 +306,7 @@ pull_up_subqueries(PlannerInfo *root, Node *jtnode, bool below_outer_join)
if (parse->rowNoWait != subquery->rowNoWait)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
- errmsg("cannot use both wait and NOWAIT in one query")));
+ errmsg("cannot use both wait and NOWAIT in one query")));
}
parse->rowMarks = list_concat(parse->rowMarks, subquery->rowMarks);
if (subquery->rowMarks)
@@ -317,10 +316,9 @@ pull_up_subqueries(PlannerInfo *root, Node *jtnode, bool below_outer_join)
}
/*
- * We also have to fix the relid sets of any parent
- * InClauseInfo nodes. (This could perhaps be done by
- * ResolveNew, but it would clutter that routine's API
- * unreasonably.)
+ * We also have to fix the relid sets of any parent InClauseInfo
+ * nodes. (This could perhaps be done by ResolveNew, but it would
+ * clutter that routine's API unreasonably.)
*/
if (root->in_info_list)
{
@@ -392,8 +390,8 @@ pull_up_subqueries(PlannerInfo *root, Node *jtnode, bool below_outer_join)
case JOIN_UNION:
/*
- * This is where we fail if upper levels of planner
- * haven't rewritten UNION JOIN as an Append ...
+ * This is where we fail if upper levels of planner haven't
+ * rewritten UNION JOIN as an Append ...
*/
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
@@ -436,8 +434,8 @@ is_simple_subquery(Query *subquery)
return false;
/*
- * Can't pull up a subquery involving grouping, aggregation, sorting,
- * or limiting.
+ * Can't pull up a subquery involving grouping, aggregation, sorting, or
+ * limiting.
*/
if (subquery->hasAggs ||
subquery->groupClause ||
@@ -449,21 +447,20 @@ is_simple_subquery(Query *subquery)
return false;
/*
- * Don't pull up a subquery that has any set-returning functions in
- * its targetlist. Otherwise we might well wind up inserting
- * set-returning functions into places where they mustn't go, such as
- * quals of higher queries.
+ * Don't pull up a subquery that has any set-returning functions in its
+ * targetlist. Otherwise we might well wind up inserting set-returning
+ * functions into places where they mustn't go, such as quals of higher
+ * queries.
*/
if (expression_returns_set((Node *) subquery->targetList))
return false;
/*
* Hack: don't try to pull up a subquery with an empty jointree.
- * query_planner() will correctly generate a Result plan for a
- * jointree that's totally empty, but I don't think the right things
- * happen if an empty FromExpr appears lower down in a jointree. Not
- * worth working hard on this, just to collapse SubqueryScan/Result
- * into Result...
+ * query_planner() will correctly generate a Result plan for a jointree
+ * that's totally empty, but I don't think the right things happen if an
+ * empty FromExpr appears lower down in a jointree. Not worth working hard
+ * on this, just to collapse SubqueryScan/Result into Result...
*/
if (subquery->jointree->fromlist == NIL)
return false;
@@ -545,8 +542,8 @@ resolvenew_in_jointree(Node *jtnode, int varno,
subtlist, CMD_SELECT, 0);
/*
- * We don't bother to update the colvars list, since it won't be
- * used again ...
+ * We don't bother to update the colvars list, since it won't be used
+ * again ...
*/
}
else
@@ -583,14 +580,13 @@ reduce_outer_joins(PlannerInfo *root)
reduce_outer_joins_state *state;
/*
- * To avoid doing strictness checks on more quals than necessary, we
- * want to stop descending the jointree as soon as there are no outer
- * joins below our current point. This consideration forces a
- * two-pass process. The first pass gathers information about which
- * base rels appear below each side of each join clause, and about
- * whether there are outer join(s) below each side of each join
- * clause. The second pass examines qual clauses and changes join
- * types as it descends the tree.
+ * To avoid doing strictness checks on more quals than necessary, we want
+ * to stop descending the jointree as soon as there are no outer joins
+ * below our current point. This consideration forces a two-pass process.
+ * The first pass gathers information about which base rels appear below
+ * each side of each join clause, and about whether there are outer
+ * join(s) below each side of each join clause. The second pass examines
+ * qual clauses and changes join types as it descends the tree.
*/
state = reduce_outer_joins_pass1((Node *) root->parse->jointree);
@@ -768,12 +764,11 @@ reduce_outer_joins_pass2(Node *jtnode,
/*
* If this join is (now) inner, we can add any nonnullability
- * constraints its quals provide to those we got from above.
- * But if it is outer, we can only pass down the local
- * constraints into the nullable side, because an outer join
- * never eliminates any rows from its non-nullable side. If
- * it's a FULL join then it doesn't eliminate anything from
- * either side.
+ * constraints its quals provide to those we got from above. But
+ * if it is outer, we can only pass down the local constraints
+ * into the nullable side, because an outer join never eliminates
+ * any rows from its non-nullable side. If it's a FULL join then
+ * it doesn't eliminate anything from either side.
*/
if (jointype != JOIN_FULL)
{
@@ -782,8 +777,7 @@ reduce_outer_joins_pass2(Node *jtnode,
nonnullable_rels);
}
else
- local_nonnullable = NULL; /* no use in calculating
- * it */
+ local_nonnullable = NULL; /* no use in calculating it */
if (left_state->contains_outer)
{
@@ -886,8 +880,8 @@ find_nonnullable_rels(Node *node, bool top_level)
NullTest *expr = (NullTest *) node;
/*
- * IS NOT NULL can be considered strict, but only at top level;
- * else we might have something like NOT (x IS NOT NULL).
+ * IS NOT NULL can be considered strict, but only at top level; else
+ * we might have something like NOT (x IS NOT NULL).
*/
if (top_level && expr->nulltesttype == IS_NOT_NULL)
result = find_nonnullable_rels((Node *) expr->arg, false);
@@ -960,10 +954,10 @@ simplify_jointree(PlannerInfo *root, Node *jtnode)
if (child && IsA(child, FromExpr))
{
/*
- * Yes, so do we want to merge it into parent? Always do
- * so if child has just one element (since that doesn't
- * make the parent's list any longer). Otherwise merge if
- * the resulting join list would be no longer than
+ * Yes, so do we want to merge it into parent? Always do so
+ * if child has just one element (since that doesn't make the
+ * parent's list any longer). Otherwise merge if the
+ * resulting join list would be no longer than
* from_collapse_limit.
*/
FromExpr *subf = (FromExpr *) child;
@@ -976,9 +970,9 @@ simplify_jointree(PlannerInfo *root, Node *jtnode)
newlist = list_concat(newlist, subf->fromlist);
/*
- * By now, the quals have been converted to
- * implicit-AND lists, so we just need to join the
- * lists. NOTE: we put the pulled-up quals first.
+ * By now, the quals have been converted to implicit-AND
+ * lists, so we just need to join the lists. NOTE: we put
+ * the pulled-up quals first.
*/
f->quals = (Node *) list_concat((List *) subf->quals,
(List *) f->quals);
@@ -1000,8 +994,8 @@ simplify_jointree(PlannerInfo *root, Node *jtnode)
j->rarg = simplify_jointree(root, j->rarg);
/*
- * If it is an outer join, we must not flatten it. An inner join
- * is semantically equivalent to a FromExpr; we convert it to one,
+ * If it is an outer join, we must not flatten it. An inner join is
+ * semantically equivalent to a FromExpr; we convert it to one,
* allowing it to be flattened into its parent, if the resulting
* FromExpr would have no more than join_collapse_limit members.
*/