aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/executor/nodeMergejoin.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/executor/nodeMergejoin.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/executor/nodeMergejoin.c12
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeMergejoin.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeMergejoin.c
index 2a1b4ed8b66..bc036a30b0d 100644
--- a/src/backend/executor/nodeMergejoin.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeMergejoin.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
*
* Therefore, rather than directly executing the merge join clauses,
* we evaluate the left and right key expressions separately and then
- * compare the columns one at a time (see MJCompare). The planner
+ * compare the columns one at a time (see MJCompare). The planner
* passes us enough information about the sort ordering of the inputs
* to allow us to determine how to make the comparison. We may use the
* appropriate btree comparison function, since Postgres' only notion
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ MJExamineQuals(List *mergeclauses,
* input, since we assume mergejoin operators are strict. If the NULL
* is in the first join column, and that column sorts nulls last, then
* we can further conclude that no following tuple can match anything
- * either, since they must all have nulls in the first column. However,
+ * either, since they must all have nulls in the first column. However,
* that case is only interesting if we're not in FillOuter mode, else
* we have to visit all the tuples anyway.
*
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ MJEvalOuterValues(MergeJoinState *mergestate)
/*
* MJEvalInnerValues
*
- * Same as above, but for the inner tuple. Here, we have to be prepared
+ * Same as above, but for the inner tuple. Here, we have to be prepared
* to load data from either the true current inner, or the marked inner,
* so caller must tell us which slot to load from.
*/
@@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ ExecMergeJoin(MergeJoinState *node)
case MJEVAL_MATCHABLE:
/*
- * OK, we have the initial tuples. Begin by skipping
+ * OK, we have the initial tuples. Begin by skipping
* non-matching tuples.
*/
node->mj_JoinState = EXEC_MJ_SKIP_TEST;
@@ -1131,7 +1131,7 @@ ExecMergeJoin(MergeJoinState *node)
* which means that all subsequent outer tuples will be
* larger than our marked inner tuples. So we need not
* revisit any of the marked tuples but can proceed to
- * look for a match to the current inner. If there's
+ * look for a match to the current inner. If there's
* no more inners, no more matches are possible.
* ----------------
*/
@@ -1522,7 +1522,7 @@ ExecInitMergeJoin(MergeJoin *node, EState *estate, int eflags)
* For certain types of inner child nodes, it is advantageous to issue
* MARK every time we advance past an inner tuple we will never return to.
* For other types, MARK on a tuple we cannot return to is a waste of
- * cycles. Detect which case applies and set mj_ExtraMarks if we want to
+ * cycles. Detect which case applies and set mj_ExtraMarks if we want to
* issue "unnecessary" MARK calls.
*
* Currently, only Material wants the extra MARKs, and it will be helpful