diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c | 33 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c index 62f166cdebe..e1e00622690 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ * * * IDENTIFICATION - * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c,v 1.13 2006/07/14 14:52:19 momjian Exp $ + * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c,v 1.14 2006/10/04 00:29:52 momjian Exp $ * *------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ @@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ BitmapHeapNext(BitmapHeapScanState *node) pgstat_count_heap_fetch(&scan->rs_pgstat_info); /* - * Set up the result slot to point to this tuple. Note that the - * slot acquires a pin on the buffer. + * Set up the result slot to point to this tuple. Note that the slot + * acquires a pin on the buffer. */ ExecStoreTuple(&scan->rs_ctup, slot, @@ -201,8 +201,8 @@ BitmapHeapNext(BitmapHeapScanState *node) false); /* - * If we are using lossy info, we have to recheck the qual - * conditions at every tuple. + * If we are using lossy info, we have to recheck the qual conditions + * at every tuple. */ if (tbmres->ntuples < 0) { @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ BitmapHeapNext(BitmapHeapScanState *node) static void bitgetpage(HeapScanDesc scan, TBMIterateResult *tbmres) { - BlockNumber page = tbmres->blockno; + BlockNumber page = tbmres->blockno; Buffer buffer; Snapshot snapshot; Page dp; @@ -259,9 +259,9 @@ bitgetpage(HeapScanDesc scan, TBMIterateResult *tbmres) snapshot = scan->rs_snapshot; /* - * We must hold share lock on the buffer content while examining - * tuple visibility. Afterwards, however, the tuples we have found - * to be visible are guaranteed good as long as we hold the buffer pin. + * We must hold share lock on the buffer content while examining tuple + * visibility. Afterwards, however, the tuples we have found to be + * visible are guaranteed good as long as we hold the buffer pin. */ LockBuffer(buffer, BUFFER_LOCK_SHARE); @@ -269,10 +269,9 @@ bitgetpage(HeapScanDesc scan, TBMIterateResult *tbmres) maxoff = PageGetMaxOffsetNumber(dp); /* - * Determine how many entries we need to look at on this page. If - * the bitmap is lossy then we need to look at each physical item - * pointer; otherwise we just look through the offsets listed in - * tbmres. + * Determine how many entries we need to look at on this page. If the + * bitmap is lossy then we need to look at each physical item pointer; + * otherwise we just look through the offsets listed in tbmres. */ if (tbmres->ntuples >= 0) { @@ -467,8 +466,8 @@ ExecInitBitmapHeapScan(BitmapHeapScan *node, EState *estate, int eflags) Assert(!(eflags & (EXEC_FLAG_BACKWARD | EXEC_FLAG_MARK))); /* - * Assert caller didn't ask for an unsafe snapshot --- see comments - * at head of file. + * Assert caller didn't ask for an unsafe snapshot --- see comments at + * head of file. */ Assert(IsMVCCSnapshot(estate->es_snapshot)); @@ -549,8 +548,8 @@ ExecInitBitmapHeapScan(BitmapHeapScan *node, EState *estate, int eflags) * initialize child nodes * * We do this last because the child nodes will open indexscans on our - * relation's indexes, and we want to be sure we have acquired a lock - * on the relation first. + * relation's indexes, and we want to be sure we have acquired a lock on + * the relation first. */ outerPlanState(scanstate) = ExecInitNode(outerPlan(node), estate, eflags); |