aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/access/heap/hio.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/access/heap/hio.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/access/heap/hio.c20
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/hio.c b/src/backend/access/heap/hio.c
index b306398aec1..631af759d78 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/heap/hio.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/heap/hio.c
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ GetVisibilityMapPins(Relation relation, Buffer buffer1, Buffer buffer2,
/*
* If there are two buffers involved and we pinned just one of them,
* it's possible that the second one became all-visible while we were
- * busy pinning the first one. If it looks like that's a possible
+ * busy pinning the first one. If it looks like that's a possible
* scenario, we'll need to make a second pass through this loop.
*/
if (buffer2 == InvalidBuffer || buffer1 == buffer2
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ GetVisibilityMapPins(Relation relation, Buffer buffer1, Buffer buffer2,
* NOTE: it is unlikely, but not quite impossible, for otherBuffer to be the
* same buffer we select for insertion of the new tuple (this could only
* happen if space is freed in that page after heap_update finds there's not
- * enough there). In that case, the page will be pinned and locked only once.
+ * enough there). In that case, the page will be pinned and locked only once.
*
* For the vmbuffer and vmbuffer_other arguments, we avoid deadlock by
* locking them only after locking the corresponding heap page, and taking
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ GetVisibilityMapPins(Relation relation, Buffer buffer1, Buffer buffer2,
* for additional constraints needed for safe usage of this behavior.)
*
* The caller can also provide a BulkInsertState object to optimize many
- * insertions into the same relation. This keeps a pin on the current
+ * insertions into the same relation. This keeps a pin on the current
* insertion target page (to save pin/unpin cycles) and also passes a
* BULKWRITE buffer selection strategy object to the buffer manager.
* Passing NULL for bistate selects the default behavior.
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ RelationGetBufferForTuple(Relation relation, Size len,
/*
* We first try to put the tuple on the same page we last inserted a tuple
- * on, as cached in the BulkInsertState or relcache entry. If that
+ * on, as cached in the BulkInsertState or relcache entry. If that
* doesn't work, we ask the Free Space Map to locate a suitable page.
* Since the FSM's info might be out of date, we have to be prepared to
* loop around and retry multiple times. (To insure this isn't an infinite
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ RelationGetBufferForTuple(Relation relation, Size len,
/*
* If the FSM knows nothing of the rel, try the last page before we
- * give up and extend. This avoids one-tuple-per-page syndrome during
+ * give up and extend. This avoids one-tuple-per-page syndrome during
* bootstrapping or in a recently-started system.
*/
if (targetBlock == InvalidBlockNumber)
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ RelationGetBufferForTuple(Relation relation, Size len,
* If the page-level all-visible flag is set, caller will need to
* clear both that and the corresponding visibility map bit. However,
* by the time we return, we'll have x-locked the buffer, and we don't
- * want to do any I/O while in that state. So we check the bit here
+ * want to do any I/O while in that state. So we check the bit here
* before taking the lock, and pin the page if it appears necessary.
* Checking without the lock creates a risk of getting the wrong
* answer, so we'll have to recheck after acquiring the lock.
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ RelationGetBufferForTuple(Relation relation, Size len,
/*
* We now have the target page (and the other buffer, if any) pinned
- * and locked. However, since our initial PageIsAllVisible checks
+ * and locked. However, since our initial PageIsAllVisible checks
* were performed before acquiring the lock, the results might now be
* out of date, either for the selected victim buffer, or for the
* other buffer passed by the caller. In that case, we'll need to
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ RelationGetBufferForTuple(Relation relation, Size len,
/*
* Not enough space, so we must give up our page locks and pin (if
- * any) and prepare to look elsewhere. We don't care which order we
+ * any) and prepare to look elsewhere. We don't care which order we
* unlock the two buffers in, so this can be slightly simpler than the
* code above.
*/
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ RelationGetBufferForTuple(Relation relation, Size len,
/*
* XXX This does an lseek - rather expensive - but at the moment it is the
- * only way to accurately determine how many blocks are in a relation. Is
+ * only way to accurately determine how many blocks are in a relation. Is
* it worth keeping an accurate file length in shared memory someplace,
* rather than relying on the kernel to do it for us?
*/
@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ RelationGetBufferForTuple(Relation relation, Size len,
/*
* Release the file-extension lock; it's now OK for someone else to extend
- * the relation some more. Note that we cannot release this lock before
+ * the relation some more. Note that we cannot release this lock before
* we have buffer lock on the new page, or we risk a race condition
* against vacuumlazy.c --- see comments therein.
*/