diff options
author | Richard Guo <rguo@postgresql.org> | 2025-02-17 11:13:15 +0900 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard Guo <rguo@postgresql.org> | 2025-02-17 11:13:15 +0900 |
commit | fbc0fe9a2efeb6172f93ad74a9656fdac5de2507 (patch) | |
tree | a6d89c218267c240a2af7682ccb30c1b5b56d154 /src | |
parent | a7f95859ef7763ffb7f87894553ab25f5268f33c (diff) | |
download | postgresql-fbc0fe9a2efeb6172f93ad74a9656fdac5de2507.tar.gz postgresql-fbc0fe9a2efeb6172f93ad74a9656fdac5de2507.zip |
Adjust tuples estimate for appendrels
In set_append_rel_size(), we currently set rel->tuples to rel->rows
for an appendrel. Generally, rel->tuples is the raw number of tuples
in the relation and rel->rows is the estimated number of tuples after
the relation's restriction clauses have been applied. Although an
appendrel itself doesn't directly enforce any quals today, its child
relations may. Therefore, setting rel->tuples equal to rel->rows for
an appendrel isn't always appropriate.
Doing so can lead to issues in cost estimates in some cases. For
instance, when estimating the number of distinct values from an
appendrel, we would not be able to adjust the estimate based on the
restriction selectivity.
This patch addresses this by setting an appendrel's tuples to the
total number of tuples accumulated from each live child, which better
aligns with reality.
This is arguably a bug, but nobody has complained about that until
now, so no back-patch.
Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4_TG_+kVn6fjG-5GYzzukrNK57=g9eUo4gsrUG26OFawg@mail.gmail.com
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c | 19 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/regress/expected/inherit.out | 30 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/regress/sql/inherit.sql | 21 |
3 files changed, 64 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c index 1115ebeee29..b5bc9b602e2 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c @@ -958,6 +958,7 @@ set_append_rel_size(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, { int parentRTindex = rti; bool has_live_children; + double parent_tuples; double parent_rows; double parent_size; double *parent_attrsizes; @@ -983,6 +984,15 @@ set_append_rel_size(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, /* * Initialize to compute size estimates for whole append relation. * + * We handle tuples estimates by setting "tuples" to the total number of + * tuples accumulated from each live child, rather than using "rows". + * Although an appendrel itself doesn't directly enforce any quals, its + * child relations may. Therefore, setting "tuples" equal to "rows" for + * an appendrel isn't always appropriate, and can lead to inaccurate cost + * estimates. For example, when estimating the number of distinct values + * from an appendrel, we would be unable to adjust the estimate based on + * the restriction selectivity (see estimate_num_groups). + * * We handle width estimates by weighting the widths of different child * rels proportionally to their number of rows. This is sensible because * the use of width estimates is mainly to compute the total relation @@ -995,6 +1005,7 @@ set_append_rel_size(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, * have zero rows and/or width, if they were excluded by constraints. */ has_live_children = false; + parent_tuples = 0; parent_rows = 0; parent_size = 0; nattrs = rel->max_attr - rel->min_attr + 1; @@ -1161,6 +1172,7 @@ set_append_rel_size(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, */ Assert(childrel->rows > 0); + parent_tuples += childrel->tuples; parent_rows += childrel->rows; parent_size += childrel->reltarget->width * childrel->rows; @@ -1207,18 +1219,13 @@ set_append_rel_size(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, int i; Assert(parent_rows > 0); + rel->tuples = parent_tuples; rel->rows = parent_rows; rel->reltarget->width = rint(parent_size / parent_rows); for (i = 0; i < nattrs; i++) rel->attr_widths[i] = rint(parent_attrsizes[i] / parent_rows); /* - * Set "raw tuples" count equal to "rows" for the appendrel; needed - * because some places assume rel->tuples is valid for any baserel. - */ - rel->tuples = parent_rows; - - /* * Note that we leave rel->pages as zero; this is important to avoid * double-counting the appendrel tree in total_table_pages. */ diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/inherit.out b/src/test/regress/expected/inherit.out index dbf3835cb14..420b6ae5996 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/inherit.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/inherit.out @@ -3666,3 +3666,33 @@ UPDATE errtst_parent SET partid = 30, data = data + 10 WHERE partid = 20; ERROR: no partition of relation "errtst_parent" found for row DETAIL: Partition key of the failing row contains (partid) = (30). DROP TABLE errtst_parent; +-- Check that we have the correct tuples estimate for an appendrel +create table tuplesest_parted (a int, b int, c float) partition by range(a); +create table tuplesest_parted1 partition of tuplesest_parted for values from (0) to (100); +create table tuplesest_parted2 partition of tuplesest_parted for values from (100) to (200); +create table tuplesest_tab (a int, b int); +insert into tuplesest_parted select i%200, i%300, i%400 from generate_series(1, 1000)i; +insert into tuplesest_tab select i, i from generate_series(1, 100)i; +analyze tuplesest_parted; +analyze tuplesest_tab; +explain (costs off) +select * from tuplesest_tab join + (select b from tuplesest_parted where c < 100 group by b) sub + on tuplesest_tab.a = sub.b; + QUERY PLAN +-------------------------------------------------------------------- + Hash Join + Hash Cond: (tuplesest_parted.b = tuplesest_tab.a) + -> HashAggregate + Group Key: tuplesest_parted.b + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on tuplesest_parted1 tuplesest_parted_1 + Filter: (c < '100'::double precision) + -> Seq Scan on tuplesest_parted2 tuplesest_parted_2 + Filter: (c < '100'::double precision) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on tuplesest_tab +(11 rows) + +drop table tuplesest_parted; +drop table tuplesest_tab; diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/inherit.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/inherit.sql index 49aae426f3c..30fba16231c 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/inherit.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/inherit.sql @@ -1483,3 +1483,24 @@ UPDATE errtst_parent SET partid = 0, data = data + 10 WHERE partid = 20; UPDATE errtst_parent SET partid = 30, data = data + 10 WHERE partid = 20; DROP TABLE errtst_parent; + +-- Check that we have the correct tuples estimate for an appendrel +create table tuplesest_parted (a int, b int, c float) partition by range(a); +create table tuplesest_parted1 partition of tuplesest_parted for values from (0) to (100); +create table tuplesest_parted2 partition of tuplesest_parted for values from (100) to (200); + +create table tuplesest_tab (a int, b int); + +insert into tuplesest_parted select i%200, i%300, i%400 from generate_series(1, 1000)i; +insert into tuplesest_tab select i, i from generate_series(1, 100)i; + +analyze tuplesest_parted; +analyze tuplesest_tab; + +explain (costs off) +select * from tuplesest_tab join + (select b from tuplesest_parted where c < 100 group by b) sub + on tuplesest_tab.a = sub.b; + +drop table tuplesest_parted; +drop table tuplesest_tab; |