aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2008-08-17 19:40:11 +0000
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2008-08-17 19:40:11 +0000
commit719012e013f10f72938520c46889c52df40fa329 (patch)
treea87f2a1051080d6c56628a6956d508b00609afcc /src
parentf2689e421d7ca0a103e33f5b92bb0676c80e1d04 (diff)
downloadpostgresql-719012e013f10f72938520c46889c52df40fa329.tar.gz
postgresql-719012e013f10f72938520c46889c52df40fa329.zip
Add some defenses against constant-FALSE outer join conditions. Since
eval_const_expressions will generally throw away anything that's ANDed with constant FALSE, what we're left with given an example like select * from tenk1 a where (unique1,0) in (select unique2,1 from tenk1 b); is a cartesian product computation, which is really not acceptable. This is a regression in CVS HEAD compared to previous releases, which were able to notice the impossible join condition in this case --- though not in some related cases that are also improved by this patch, such as select * from tenk1 a left join tenk1 b on (a.unique1=b.unique2 and 0=1); Fix by skipping evaluation of the appropriate side of the outer join in cases where it's demonstrably unnecessary.
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c79
1 files changed, 64 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c
index b517f09e003..9ac0cc97431 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
- * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c,v 1.93 2008/08/14 18:47:59 tgl Exp $
+ * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c,v 1.94 2008/08/17 19:40:11 tgl Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ static List *make_rels_by_clauseless_joins(PlannerInfo *root,
static bool has_join_restriction(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel);
static bool has_legal_joinclause(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel);
static bool is_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel);
-static void mark_dummy_join(RelOptInfo *rel);
+static void mark_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel);
+static bool restriction_is_constant_false(List *restrictlist);
/*
@@ -558,15 +559,20 @@ make_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2)
* this way since it's conceivable that dummy-ness of a multi-element
* join might only be noticeable for certain construction paths.)
*
+ * Also, a provably constant-false join restriction typically means that
+ * we can skip evaluating one or both sides of the join. We do this
+ * by marking the appropriate rel as dummy.
+ *
* We need only consider the jointypes that appear in join_info_list,
* plus JOIN_INNER.
*/
switch (sjinfo->jointype)
{
case JOIN_INNER:
- if (is_dummy_rel(rel1) || is_dummy_rel(rel2))
+ if (is_dummy_rel(rel1) || is_dummy_rel(rel2) ||
+ restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist))
{
- mark_dummy_join(joinrel);
+ mark_dummy_rel(joinrel);
break;
}
add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel1, rel2,
@@ -579,9 +585,12 @@ make_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2)
case JOIN_LEFT:
if (is_dummy_rel(rel1))
{
- mark_dummy_join(joinrel);
+ mark_dummy_rel(joinrel);
break;
}
+ if (restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist) &&
+ bms_is_subset(rel2->relids, sjinfo->syn_righthand))
+ mark_dummy_rel(rel2);
add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel1, rel2,
JOIN_LEFT, sjinfo,
restrictlist);
@@ -592,7 +601,7 @@ make_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2)
case JOIN_FULL:
if (is_dummy_rel(rel1) && is_dummy_rel(rel2))
{
- mark_dummy_join(joinrel);
+ mark_dummy_rel(joinrel);
break;
}
add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel1, rel2,
@@ -603,9 +612,10 @@ make_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2)
restrictlist);
break;
case JOIN_SEMI:
- if (is_dummy_rel(rel1) || is_dummy_rel(rel2))
+ if (is_dummy_rel(rel1) || is_dummy_rel(rel2) ||
+ restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist))
{
- mark_dummy_join(joinrel);
+ mark_dummy_rel(joinrel);
break;
}
add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel1, rel2,
@@ -632,9 +642,12 @@ make_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2)
case JOIN_ANTI:
if (is_dummy_rel(rel1))
{
- mark_dummy_join(joinrel);
+ mark_dummy_rel(joinrel);
break;
}
+ if (restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist) &&
+ bms_is_subset(rel2->relids, sjinfo->syn_righthand))
+ mark_dummy_rel(rel2);
add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel1, rel2,
JOIN_ANTI, sjinfo,
restrictlist);
@@ -851,10 +864,10 @@ is_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel)
}
/*
- * Mark a joinrel as proven empty.
+ * Mark a rel as proven empty.
*/
static void
-mark_dummy_join(RelOptInfo *rel)
+mark_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel)
{
/* Set dummy size estimate */
rel->rows = 0;
@@ -865,10 +878,46 @@ mark_dummy_join(RelOptInfo *rel)
/* Set up the dummy path */
add_path(rel, (Path *) create_append_path(rel, NIL));
+ /* Set or update cheapest_total_path */
+ set_cheapest(rel);
+}
+
+
+/*
+ * restriction_is_constant_false --- is a restrictlist just FALSE?
+ *
+ * In cases where a qual is provably constant FALSE, eval_const_expressions
+ * will generally have thrown away anything that's ANDed with it. In outer
+ * join situations this will leave us computing cartesian products only to
+ * decide there's no match for an outer row, which is pretty stupid. So,
+ * we need to detect the case.
+ */
+static bool
+restriction_is_constant_false(List *restrictlist)
+{
+ ListCell *lc;
+
/*
- * Although set_cheapest will be done again later, we do it immediately
- * in order to keep is_dummy_rel as cheap as possible (ie, not have
- * to examine the pathlist).
+ * Despite the above comment, the restriction list we see here might
+ * possibly have other members besides the FALSE constant, since other
+ * quals could get "pushed down" to the outer join level. So we check
+ * each member of the list.
*/
- set_cheapest(rel);
+ foreach(lc, restrictlist)
+ {
+ RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(lc);
+
+ Assert(IsA(rinfo, RestrictInfo));
+ if (rinfo->clause && IsA(rinfo->clause, Const))
+ {
+ Const *con = (Const *) rinfo->clause;
+
+ /* constant NULL is as good as constant FALSE for our purposes */
+ if (con->constisnull)
+ return true;
+ if (!DatumGetBool(con->constvalue))
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+ return false;
}