Avoid calling memcpy() with a NULL source pointer and count == 0.

As in commit 0a52d378b03b7d5a, avoid doing something that has undefined
results according to the C standard, even though in practice there does
not seem to be any problem with it.

This fixes two places in numeric.c that demonstrably could call memcpy()
with such arguments.  I looked through that file and didn't see any other
places with similar hazards; this is not to claim that there are not such
places in other files.

Per report from Piotr Stefaniak.  Back-patch to 9.5 which is where the
previous commit was added.  We're more or less setting a precedent that
we will not worry about this type of issue in pre-9.5 branches unless
someone demonstrates a problem in the field.

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c
index 7ce41b78888..1bfa29e1b28 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c
@@ -4769,7 +4769,9 @@ set_var_from_var(NumericVar *value, NumericVar *dest)
 
 	newbuf = digitbuf_alloc(value->ndigits + 1);
 	newbuf[0] = 0;				/* spare digit for rounding */
-	memcpy(newbuf + 1, value->digits, value->ndigits * sizeof(NumericDigit));
+	if (value->ndigits > 0)		/* else value->digits might be null */
+		memcpy(newbuf + 1, value->digits,
+			   value->ndigits * sizeof(NumericDigit));
 
 	digitbuf_free(dest->buf);
 
@@ -5090,8 +5092,9 @@ make_result(NumericVar *var)
 		result->choice.n_long.n_weight = weight;
 	}
 
-	memcpy(NUMERIC_DIGITS(result), digits, n * sizeof(NumericDigit));
 	Assert(NUMERIC_NDIGITS(result) == n);
+	if (n > 0)
+		memcpy(NUMERIC_DIGITS(result), digits, n * sizeof(NumericDigit));
 
 	/* Check for overflow of int16 fields */
 	if (NUMERIC_WEIGHT(result) != weight ||