diff options
author | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2017-01-16 15:23:11 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2017-01-16 15:23:11 -0500 |
commit | d43a619c60405ecda275ca9e3ac9ead242e20ecb (patch) | |
tree | abef4f102faddf78034b0304367403b600914e4c /src/backend/parser/parse_func.c | |
parent | 4e46c97fde42fa8ca57d29b9b47f2ebd11ab8105 (diff) | |
download | postgresql-d43a619c60405ecda275ca9e3ac9ead242e20ecb.tar.gz postgresql-d43a619c60405ecda275ca9e3ac9ead242e20ecb.zip |
Fix check_srf_call_placement() to handle VALUES cases correctly.
INSERT ... VALUES with a single VALUES row is implemented quite differently
from the general VALUES case. A user-visible implication of that is that
we accept SRFs in the single-row case, but not in the multi-row case.
That's a historical artifact no doubt, but in view of the lack of field
complaints, I'm not excited about fixing it right now.
However, check_srf_call_placement() needs to know about this, first because
it should throw an error in the unsupported case, and second because it
should set p_hasTargetSRFs in the single-row case (because we treat that
like a SELECT tlist). That's an oversight in commit a4c35ea1c.
To fix, split EXPR_KIND_VALUES into two values. So far as I can see,
this is the only place where we need to distinguish the two cases at
present; but there might be more later.
Patch by me, per report from Andres Freund.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170116081548.zg63zltblwimpfgp@alap3.anarazel.de
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/parser/parse_func.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/parser/parse_func.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/parser/parse_func.c b/src/backend/parser/parse_func.c index 12979602e59..a52261f2e92 100644 --- a/src/backend/parser/parse_func.c +++ b/src/backend/parser/parse_func.c @@ -2141,7 +2141,12 @@ check_srf_call_placement(ParseState *pstate, int location) errkind = true; break; case EXPR_KIND_VALUES: - /* okay */ + /* SRFs are presently not supported by nodeValuesscan.c */ + errkind = true; + break; + case EXPR_KIND_VALUES_SINGLE: + /* okay, since we process this like a SELECT tlist */ + pstate->p_hasTargetSRFs = true; break; case EXPR_KIND_CHECK_CONSTRAINT: case EXPR_KIND_DOMAIN_CHECK: |