aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2005-04-25 03:58:30 +0000
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2005-04-25 03:58:30 +0000
commit1fcd4b7a07a5cfb00e064c4bdd984e52cde71a5c (patch)
treeb1bf9acf968752e5cad5a8ed34f2928c9d822a30 /src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c
parent79a1b00226354e2c7f1bf5c1db90661b1f5a4148 (diff)
downloadpostgresql-1fcd4b7a07a5cfb00e064c4bdd984e52cde71a5c.tar.gz
postgresql-1fcd4b7a07a5cfb00e064c4bdd984e52cde71a5c.zip
While determining the filter clauses for an index scan (either plain
or bitmap), use pred_test to be a little smarter about cases where a filter clause is logically unnecessary. This may be overkill for the plain indexscan case, but it's definitely useful for OR'd bitmap scans.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c52
1 files changed, 41 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c
index 8c06278f8fe..3feff40423f 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
- * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c,v 1.186 2005/04/25 02:14:47 tgl Exp $
+ * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c,v 1.187 2005/04/25 03:58:30 tgl Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@@ -720,6 +720,7 @@ create_indexscan_plan(Query *root,
List *nonlossy_indexquals;
List *indexstrategy;
List *indexsubtype;
+ ListCell *l;
IndexScan *scan_plan;
/* it should be a base rel... */
@@ -768,13 +769,31 @@ create_indexscan_plan(Query *root,
* checked (either by the index itself, or by nodeIndexscan.c), but if
* there are any "special" operators involved then they must be included
* in qpqual. Also, any lossy index operators must be rechecked in
- * the qpqual. The upshot is that qpquals must contain scan_clauses
+ * the qpqual. The upshot is that qpqual must contain scan_clauses
* minus whatever appears in nonlossy_indexquals.
+ *
+ * In normal cases simple pointer equality checks will be enough to
+ * spot duplicate RestrictInfos, so we try that first. In some situations
+ * (particularly with OR'd index conditions) we may have scan_clauses
+ * that are not equal to, but are logically implied by, the index quals;
+ * so we also try a pred_test() check to see if we can discard quals
+ * that way.
+ *
+ * While at it, we strip off the RestrictInfos to produce a list of
+ * plain expressions.
*/
- qpqual = list_difference_ptr(scan_clauses, nonlossy_indexquals);
+ qpqual = NIL;
+ foreach(l, scan_clauses)
+ {
+ RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(l);
- /* Reduce RestrictInfo list to bare expressions */
- qpqual = get_actual_clauses(qpqual);
+ Assert(IsA(rinfo, RestrictInfo));
+ if (list_member_ptr(nonlossy_indexquals, rinfo))
+ continue;
+ if (pred_test(list_make1(rinfo->clause), nonlossy_indexquals))
+ continue;
+ qpqual = lappend(qpqual, rinfo->clause);
+ }
/* Sort clauses into best execution order */
qpqual = order_qual_clauses(root, qpqual);
@@ -813,6 +832,7 @@ create_bitmap_scan_plan(Query *root,
List *bitmapqualorig;
List *indexquals;
List *qpqual;
+ ListCell *l;
BitmapHeapScan *scan_plan;
/* it should be a base rel... */
@@ -848,13 +868,23 @@ create_bitmap_scan_plan(Query *root,
* must be added to qpqual. The upshot is that qpquals must contain
* scan_clauses minus whatever appears in indexquals.
*
- * NOTE: when there are OR clauses in indexquals, the simple equality
- * check used by list_difference will only detect matches in case of
- * chance equality of the OR subclause ordering. This is probably all
- * right for now because that order will match what's in scan_clauses
- * ... but perhaps we need more smarts here.
+ * In normal cases simple equal() checks will be enough to spot duplicate
+ * clauses, so we try that first. In some situations (particularly with
+ * OR'd index conditions) we may have scan_clauses that are not equal to,
+ * but are logically implied by, the index quals; so we also try a
+ * pred_test() check to see if we can discard quals that way.
*/
- qpqual = list_difference(scan_clauses, indexquals);
+ qpqual = NIL;
+ foreach(l, scan_clauses)
+ {
+ Node *clause = (Node *) lfirst(l);
+
+ if (list_member(indexquals, clause))
+ continue;
+ if (pred_test(list_make1(clause), indexquals))
+ continue;
+ qpqual = lappend(qpqual, clause);
+ }
/* Sort clauses into best execution order */
qpqual = order_qual_clauses(root, qpqual);