diff options
author | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 1999-07-27 03:51:11 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 1999-07-27 03:51:11 +0000 |
commit | 9e7e29e6c9dd386a56ab23f419bc358f630cf768 (patch) | |
tree | 43859920134e180b991a001e35173a8a715da440 /src/backend/optimizer/path/orindxpath.c | |
parent | 434df3fb7a545637610f02c5491be1d6ce81069f (diff) | |
download | postgresql-9e7e29e6c9dd386a56ab23f419bc358f630cf768.tar.gz postgresql-9e7e29e6c9dd386a56ab23f419bc358f630cf768.zip |
First cut at doing LIKE/regex indexing optimization in
optimizer rather than parser. This has many advantages, such as not
getting fooled by chance uses of operator names ~ and ~~ (the operators
are identified by OID now), and not creating useless comparison operations
in contexts where the comparisons will not actually be used as indexquals.
The new code also recognizes exact-match LIKE and regex patterns, and
produces an = indexqual instead of >= and <=.
This change does NOT fix the problem with non-ASCII locales: the code
still doesn't know how to generate an upper bound indexqual for non-ASCII
collation order. But it's no worse than before, just the same deficiency
in a different place...
Also, dike out loc_restrictinfo fields in Plan nodes. These were doing
nothing useful in the absence of 'expensive functions' optimization,
and they took a considerable amount of processing to fill in.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/optimizer/path/orindxpath.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/optimizer/path/orindxpath.c | 89 |
1 files changed, 38 insertions, 51 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/orindxpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/orindxpath.c index 39fa69cdef8..450b8d7b2dc 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/orindxpath.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/orindxpath.c @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ * * * IDENTIFICATION - * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/path/orindxpath.c,v 1.30 1999/07/25 23:07:24 tgl Exp $ + * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/path/orindxpath.c,v 1.31 1999/07/27 03:51:02 tgl Exp $ * *------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ @@ -28,11 +28,13 @@ static void best_or_subclause_indices(Query *root, RelOptInfo *rel, List *subclauses, List *indices, + List **indexquals, List **indexids, Cost *cost, Cost *selec); static void best_or_subclause_index(Query *root, RelOptInfo *rel, - Expr *subclause, List *indices, - int *indexid, Cost *cost, Cost *selec); + List *indexqual, List *indices, + int *retIndexid, + Cost *retCost, Cost *retSelec); /* @@ -84,8 +86,8 @@ create_or_index_paths(Query *root, * best available index for each subclause. */ IndexPath *pathnode = makeNode(IndexPath); + List *indexquals; List *indexids; - List *orclause; Cost cost; Cost selec; @@ -93,6 +95,7 @@ create_or_index_paths(Query *root, rel, clausenode->clause->args, clausenode->indexids, + &indexquals, &indexids, &cost, &selec); @@ -111,43 +114,11 @@ create_or_index_paths(Query *root, pathnode->path.pathorder->ord.sortop = NULL; pathnode->path.pathkeys = NIL; - /* - * Generate an indexqual list from the OR clause's args. - * We want two levels of sublist: the first is implicit OR - * and the second is implicit AND. (Currently, we will never - * see a sub-AND-clause because of cnfify(), but someday maybe - * the code below will do something useful...) - */ - pathnode->indexqual = NIL; - foreach(orclause, clausenode->clause->args) - { - Expr *subclause = (Expr *) lfirst(orclause); - List *sublist; - - if (and_clause((Node *) subclause)) - sublist = subclause->args; - else - sublist = lcons(subclause, NIL); - /* expansion call... */ - pathnode->indexqual = lappend(pathnode->indexqual, - sublist); - } + pathnode->indexqual = indexquals; pathnode->indexid = indexids; pathnode->path.path_cost = cost; clausenode->selectivity = (Cost) selec; - /* - * copy restrictinfo list into path for expensive function - * processing -- JMH, 7/7/92 - */ - pathnode->path.loc_restrictinfo = set_difference(copyObject((Node *) rel->restrictinfo), - lcons(clausenode, NIL)); - -#ifdef NOT_USED /* fix xfunc */ - /* add in cost for expensive functions! -- JMH, 7/7/92 */ - if (XfuncMode != XFUNC_OFF) - ((Path *) pathnode)->path_cost += xfunc_get_path_cost((Path) pathnode); -#endif path_list = lappend(path_list, pathnode); } } @@ -163,11 +134,21 @@ create_or_index_paths(Query *root, * indices. The cost is the sum of the individual index costs, since * the executor will perform a scan for each subclause of the 'or'. * + * This routine also creates the indexquals and indexids lists that will + * be needed by the executor. The indexquals list has one entry for each + * scan of the base rel, which is a sublist of indexqual conditions to + * apply in that scan. The implicit semantics are AND across each sublist + * of quals, and OR across the toplevel list (note that the executor + * takes care not to return any single tuple more than once). The indexids + * list gives the index to be used in each scan. + * * 'rel' is the node of the relation on which the indexes are defined * 'subclauses' are the subclauses of the 'or' clause * 'indices' is a list of sublists of the index nodes that matched each * subclause of the 'or' clause - * '*indexids' gets a list of the best index ID to use for each subclause + * '*indexquals' gets the constructed indexquals for the path (a list + * of sublists of clauses, one sublist per scan of the base rel) + * '*indexids' gets a list of the index IDs for each scan of the rel * '*cost' gets the total cost of the path * '*selec' gets the total selectivity of the path. */ @@ -176,27 +157,41 @@ best_or_subclause_indices(Query *root, RelOptInfo *rel, List *subclauses, List *indices, + List **indexquals, /* return value */ List **indexids, /* return value */ Cost *cost, /* return value */ Cost *selec) /* return value */ { List *slist; + *indexquals = NIL; *indexids = NIL; - *selec = (Cost) 0.0; *cost = (Cost) 0.0; + *selec = (Cost) 0.0; foreach(slist, subclauses) { + Expr *subclause = lfirst(slist); + List *indexqual; int best_indexid; Cost best_cost; Cost best_selec; - best_or_subclause_index(root, rel, lfirst(slist), lfirst(indices), + /* Convert this 'or' subclause to an indexqual list */ + indexqual = make_ands_implicit(subclause); + /* expand special operators to indexquals the executor can handle */ + indexqual = expand_indexqual_conditions(indexqual); + + best_or_subclause_index(root, rel, indexqual, lfirst(indices), &best_indexid, &best_cost, &best_selec); + *indexquals = lappend(*indexquals, indexqual); *indexids = lappendi(*indexids, best_indexid); *cost += best_cost; + /* We approximate the selectivity as the sum of the clause + * selectivities (but not more than 1). + * XXX This is too pessimistic, isn't it? + */ *selec += best_selec; if (*selec > (Cost) 1.0) *selec = (Cost) 1.0; @@ -212,7 +207,7 @@ best_or_subclause_indices(Query *root, * the least expensive. * * 'rel' is the node of the relation on which the index is defined - * 'subclause' is the subclause + * 'indexqual' is the indexqual list derived from the subclause * 'indices' is a list of index nodes that match the subclause * '*retIndexid' gets the ID of the best index * '*retCost' gets the cost of a scan with that index @@ -221,14 +216,13 @@ best_or_subclause_indices(Query *root, static void best_or_subclause_index(Query *root, RelOptInfo *rel, - Expr *subclause, + List *indexqual, List *indices, int *retIndexid, /* return value */ Cost *retCost, /* return value */ Cost *retSelec) /* return value */ { bool first_run = true; - List *indexquals; List *ilist; /* if we don't match anything, return zeros */ @@ -236,13 +230,6 @@ best_or_subclause_index(Query *root, *retCost = (Cost) 0.0; *retSelec = (Cost) 0.0; - /* convert 'or' subclause to an indexqual list */ - if (and_clause((Node *) subclause)) - indexquals = subclause->args; - else - indexquals = lcons(subclause, NIL); - /* expansion call... */ - foreach(ilist, indices) { RelOptInfo *index = (RelOptInfo *) lfirst(ilist); @@ -254,7 +241,7 @@ best_or_subclause_index(Query *root, index_selectivity(root, lfirsti(rel->relids), indexid, - indexquals, + indexqual, &npages, &selec); |