Fix dynahash.c to suppress hash bucket splits while a hash_seq_search() scan

is in progress on the same hashtable.  This seems the least invasive way to
fix the recently-recognized problem that a split could cause the scan to
visit entries twice or (with much lower probability) miss them entirely.
The only field-reported problem caused by this is the "failed to re-find
shared lock object" PANIC in COMMIT PREPARED reported by Michel Dorochevsky,
which was caused by multiply visited entries.  However, it seems certain
that mdsync() is vulnerable to missing required fsync's due to missed
entries, and I am fearful that RelationCacheInitializePhase2() might be at
risk as well.  Because of that and the generalized hazard presented by this
bug, back-patch all the supported branches.

Along the way, fix pg_prepared_statement() and pg_cursor() to not assume
that the hashtables they are examining will stay static between calls.
This is risky regardless of the newly noted dynahash problem, because
hash_seq_search() has never promised to cope with deletion of table entries
other than the just-returned one.  There may be no bug here because the only
supported way to call these functions is via ExecMakeTableFunctionResult()
which will cycle them to completion before doing anything very interesting,
but it seems best to get rid of the assumption.  This affects 8.2 and HEAD
only, since those functions weren't there earlier.

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeSubplan.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeSubplan.c
index bb0508d6bc2..a66f51c26a6 100644
--- a/src/backend/executor/nodeSubplan.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeSubplan.c
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
  * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
  *
  * IDENTIFICATION
- *	  $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeSubplan.c,v 1.87 2007/02/27 01:11:25 tgl Exp $
+ *	  $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeSubplan.c,v 1.88 2007/04/26 23:24:44 tgl Exp $
  *
  *-------------------------------------------------------------------------
  */
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ findPartialMatch(TupleHashTable hashtable, TupleTableSlot *slot)
 	TupleHashIterator hashiter;
 	TupleHashEntry entry;
 
-	ResetTupleHashIterator(hashtable, &hashiter);
+	InitTupleHashIterator(hashtable, &hashiter);
 	while ((entry = ScanTupleHashTable(&hashiter)) != NULL)
 	{
 		ExecStoreMinimalTuple(entry->firstTuple, hashtable->tableslot, false);
@@ -577,8 +577,12 @@ findPartialMatch(TupleHashTable hashtable, TupleTableSlot *slot)
 							   numCols, keyColIdx,
 							   hashtable->cur_eq_funcs,
 							   hashtable->tempcxt))
+		{
+			TermTupleHashIterator(&hashiter);
 			return true;
+		}
 	}
+	/* No TermTupleHashIterator call needed here */
 	return false;
 }