Revert "Do execGrouping.c via expression eval machinery."

This reverts commit 773aec7aa98abd38d6d9435913bb8e14e392c274.

There's an unresolved issue in the reverted commit: It only creates
one comparator function, but in for the nodeSubplan.c case we need
more (c.f. FindTupleHashEntry vs LookupTupleHashEntry calls in
nodeSubplan.c).

This isn't too difficult to fix, but it's not entirely trivial
either. The fact that the issue only causes breakage on 32bit systems
shows that the current test coverage isn't that great.  To avoid
turning half the buildfarm red till those two issues are addressed,
revert.

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 79 deletions

diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeSubplan.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeSubplan.c
index fcf739b5e23..edf7d034bd3 100644
--- a/src/backend/executor/nodeSubplan.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeSubplan.c
@@ -494,9 +494,7 @@ buildSubPlanHash(SubPlanState *node, ExprContext *econtext)
 	if (nbuckets < 1)
 		nbuckets = 1;
 
-	node->hashtable = BuildTupleHashTable(node->parent,
-										  node->descRight,
-										  ncols,
+	node->hashtable = BuildTupleHashTable(ncols,
 										  node->keyColIdx,
 										  node->tab_eq_funcs,
 										  node->tab_hash_funcs,
@@ -516,9 +514,7 @@ buildSubPlanHash(SubPlanState *node, ExprContext *econtext)
 			if (nbuckets < 1)
 				nbuckets = 1;
 		}
-		node->hashnulls = BuildTupleHashTable(node->parent,
-											  node->descRight,
-											  ncols,
+		node->hashnulls = BuildTupleHashTable(ncols,
 											  node->keyColIdx,
 											  node->tab_eq_funcs,
 											  node->tab_hash_funcs,
@@ -602,78 +598,6 @@ buildSubPlanHash(SubPlanState *node, ExprContext *econtext)
 	MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext);
 }
 
-
-/*
- * execTuplesUnequal
- *		Return true if two tuples are definitely unequal in the indicated
- *		fields.
- *
- * Nulls are neither equal nor unequal to anything else.  A true result
- * is obtained only if there are non-null fields that compare not-equal.
- *
- * slot1, slot2: the tuples to compare (must have same columns!)
- * numCols: the number of attributes to be examined
- * matchColIdx: array of attribute column numbers
- * eqFunctions: array of fmgr lookup info for the equality functions to use
- * evalContext: short-term memory context for executing the functions
- */
-static bool
-execTuplesUnequal(TupleTableSlot *slot1,
-				  TupleTableSlot *slot2,
-				  int numCols,
-				  AttrNumber *matchColIdx,
-				  FmgrInfo *eqfunctions,
-				  MemoryContext evalContext)
-{
-	MemoryContext oldContext;
-	bool		result;
-	int			i;
-
-	/* Reset and switch into the temp context. */
-	MemoryContextReset(evalContext);
-	oldContext = MemoryContextSwitchTo(evalContext);
-
-	/*
-	 * We cannot report a match without checking all the fields, but we can
-	 * report a non-match as soon as we find unequal fields.  So, start
-	 * comparing at the last field (least significant sort key). That's the
-	 * most likely to be different if we are dealing with sorted input.
-	 */
-	result = false;
-
-	for (i = numCols; --i >= 0;)
-	{
-		AttrNumber	att = matchColIdx[i];
-		Datum		attr1,
-					attr2;
-		bool		isNull1,
-					isNull2;
-
-		attr1 = slot_getattr(slot1, att, &isNull1);
-
-		if (isNull1)
-			continue;			/* can't prove anything here */
-
-		attr2 = slot_getattr(slot2, att, &isNull2);
-
-		if (isNull2)
-			continue;			/* can't prove anything here */
-
-		/* Apply the type-specific equality function */
-
-		if (!DatumGetBool(FunctionCall2(&eqfunctions[i],
-										attr1, attr2)))
-		{
-			result = true;		/* they are unequal */
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-
-	MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldContext);
-
-	return result;
-}
-
 /*
  * findPartialMatch: does the hashtable contain an entry that is not
  * provably distinct from the tuple?
@@ -963,7 +887,6 @@ ExecInitSubPlan(SubPlan *subplan, PlanState *parent)
 												   NULL);
 
 		tupDesc = ExecTypeFromTL(righttlist, false);
-		sstate->descRight = tupDesc;
 		slot = ExecInitExtraTupleSlot(estate);
 		ExecSetSlotDescriptor(slot, tupDesc);
 		sstate->projRight = ExecBuildProjectionInfo(righttlist,