diff options
| author | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2018-10-06 15:49:37 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2018-10-06 15:49:37 -0400 |
| commit | 29ef2b310da9892fda075ff9ee12da7f92d5da6e (patch) | |
| tree | 9505320f23af01455ff4cde46bd33702b3ddf635 /src/backend/executor/nodeSamplescan.c | |
| parent | f2343653f5b2aecfc759f36dbb3fd2a61f36853e (diff) | |
| download | postgresql-29ef2b310da9892fda075ff9ee12da7f92d5da6e.tar.gz postgresql-29ef2b310da9892fda075ff9ee12da7f92d5da6e.zip | |
Restore sane locking behavior during parallel query.
Commit 9a3cebeaa changed things so that parallel workers didn't obtain
any lock of their own on tables they access. That was clearly a bad
idea, but I'd mistakenly supposed that it was the intended end result
of the series of patches for simplifying the executor's lock management.
Undo that change in relation_open(), and adjust ExecOpenScanRelation()
so that it gets the correct lock if inside a parallel worker.
In passing, clean up some more obsolete comments about when locks
are acquired.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/468c85d9-540e-66a2-1dde-fec2b741e688@lab.ntt.co.jp
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/executor/nodeSamplescan.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/backend/executor/nodeSamplescan.c | 5 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeSamplescan.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeSamplescan.c index 70ae1bc7e46..f01fc3b62a0 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeSamplescan.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeSamplescan.c @@ -134,10 +134,7 @@ ExecInitSampleScan(SampleScan *node, EState *estate, int eflags) ExecAssignExprContext(estate, &scanstate->ss.ps); /* - * Initialize scan relation. - * - * Get the relation object id from the relid'th entry in the range table, - * open that relation and acquire appropriate lock on it. + * open the scan relation */ scanstate->ss.ss_currentRelation = ExecOpenScanRelation(estate, |