aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/executor/nodeIncrementalSort.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@postgresql.org>2020-11-03 20:43:12 +0100
committerTomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@postgresql.org>2020-11-03 22:31:57 +0100
commit90851d1d26f54ccb4d7b1bc49449138113d6ec83 (patch)
tree60f73bee924cf06c61c15ae9a4ada81b0412b7e3 /src/backend/executor/nodeIncrementalSort.c
parentebb7ae839d033d0f279670e249f54646a08b8c48 (diff)
downloadpostgresql-90851d1d26f54ccb4d7b1bc49449138113d6ec83.tar.gz
postgresql-90851d1d26f54ccb4d7b1bc49449138113d6ec83.zip
Use INT64_FORMAT to print int64 variables in sort debug
Commit 6ee3b5fb99 cleaned up most of the long/int64 confusion related to incremental sort, but the sort debug messages were still using %ld for int64 variables. So fix that. Author: Haiying Tang Backpatch-through: 13, where the incremental sort code was added Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4250be9d350c4992abb722a76e288aef%40G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/executor/nodeIncrementalSort.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/executor/nodeIncrementalSort.c28
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeIncrementalSort.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeIncrementalSort.c
index eb6cc19a60c..eb1c1326dea 100644
--- a/src/backend/executor/nodeIncrementalSort.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeIncrementalSort.c
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ switchToPresortedPrefixMode(PlanState *pstate)
*/
if (node->bounded)
{
- SO1_printf("Setting bound on presorted prefix tuplesort to: %ld\n",
+ SO1_printf("Setting bound on presorted prefix tuplesort to: " INT64_FORMAT "\n",
node->bound - node->bound_Done);
tuplesort_set_bound(node->prefixsort_state,
node->bound - node->bound_Done);
@@ -417,9 +417,9 @@ switchToPresortedPrefixMode(PlanState *pstate)
* remaining in the large single prefix key group we think we've
* encountered.
*/
- SO1_printf("Moving %ld tuples to presorted prefix tuplesort\n", nTuples);
+ SO1_printf("Moving " INT64_FORMAT " tuples to presorted prefix tuplesort\n", nTuples);
node->n_fullsort_remaining -= nTuples;
- SO1_printf("Setting n_fullsort_remaining to %ld\n", node->n_fullsort_remaining);
+ SO1_printf("Setting n_fullsort_remaining to " INT64_FORMAT "\n", node->n_fullsort_remaining);
if (lastTuple)
{
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ switchToPresortedPrefixMode(PlanState *pstate)
* out all of those tuples, and then come back around to find another
* batch.
*/
- SO1_printf("Sorting presorted prefix tuplesort with %ld tuples\n", nTuples);
+ SO1_printf("Sorting presorted prefix tuplesort with " INT64_FORMAT " tuples\n", nTuples);
tuplesort_performsort(node->prefixsort_state);
INSTRUMENT_SORT_GROUP(node, prefixsort);
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ switchToPresortedPrefixMode(PlanState *pstate)
* - n), so store the current number of processed tuples for use
* in configuring sorting bound.
*/
- SO2_printf("Changing bound_Done from %ld to %ld\n",
+ SO2_printf("Changing bound_Done from " INT64_FORMAT " to " INT64_FORMAT "\n",
Min(node->bound, node->bound_Done + nTuples), node->bound_Done);
node->bound_Done = Min(node->bound, node->bound_Done + nTuples);
}
@@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ ExecIncrementalSort(PlanState *pstate)
* need to re-execute the prefix mode transition function to pull
* out the next prefix key group.
*/
- SO1_printf("Re-calling switchToPresortedPrefixMode() because n_fullsort_remaining is > 0 (%ld)\n",
+ SO1_printf("Re-calling switchToPresortedPrefixMode() because n_fullsort_remaining is > 0 (" INT64_FORMAT ")\n",
node->n_fullsort_remaining);
switchToPresortedPrefixMode(pstate);
}
@@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ ExecIncrementalSort(PlanState *pstate)
*/
node->outerNodeDone = true;
- SO1_printf("Sorting fullsort with %ld tuples\n", nTuples);
+ SO1_printf("Sorting fullsort with " INT64_FORMAT " tuples\n", nTuples);
tuplesort_performsort(fullsort_state);
INSTRUMENT_SORT_GROUP(node, fullsort);
@@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ ExecIncrementalSort(PlanState *pstate)
* current number of processed tuples for later use
* configuring the sort state's bound.
*/
- SO2_printf("Changing bound_Done from %ld to %ld\n",
+ SO2_printf("Changing bound_Done from " INT64_FORMAT " to " INT64_FORMAT "\n",
node->bound_Done,
Min(node->bound, node->bound_Done + nTuples));
node->bound_Done = Min(node->bound, node->bound_Done + nTuples);
@@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ ExecIncrementalSort(PlanState *pstate)
* sort and transition modes to reading out the sorted
* tuples.
*/
- SO1_printf("Sorting fullsort tuplesort with %ld tuples\n",
+ SO1_printf("Sorting fullsort tuplesort with " INT64_FORMAT " tuples\n",
nTuples);
tuplesort_performsort(fullsort_state);
@@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ ExecIncrementalSort(PlanState *pstate)
* on FIFO retrieval semantics when transferring them to the
* presorted prefix tuplesort.
*/
- SO1_printf("Sorting fullsort tuplesort with %ld tuples\n", nTuples);
+ SO1_printf("Sorting fullsort tuplesort with " INT64_FORMAT " tuples\n", nTuples);
tuplesort_performsort(fullsort_state);
INSTRUMENT_SORT_GROUP(node, fullsort);
@@ -847,12 +847,12 @@ ExecIncrementalSort(PlanState *pstate)
{
int64 currentBound = node->bound - node->bound_Done;
- SO2_printf("Read %ld tuples, but setting to %ld because we used bounded sort\n",
+ SO2_printf("Read " INT64_FORMAT " tuples, but setting to " INT64_FORMAT " because we used bounded sort\n",
nTuples, Min(currentBound, nTuples));
nTuples = Min(currentBound, nTuples);
}
- SO1_printf("Setting n_fullsort_remaining to %ld and calling switchToPresortedPrefixMode()\n",
+ SO1_printf("Setting n_fullsort_remaining to " INT64_FORMAT " and calling switchToPresortedPrefixMode()\n",
nTuples);
/*
@@ -942,7 +942,7 @@ ExecIncrementalSort(PlanState *pstate)
* Perform the sort and begin returning the tuples to the parent plan
* node.
*/
- SO1_printf("Sorting presorted prefix tuplesort with >= %ld tuples\n", nTuples);
+ SO1_printf("Sorting presorted prefix tuplesort with " INT64_FORMAT " tuples\n", nTuples);
tuplesort_performsort(node->prefixsort_state);
INSTRUMENT_SORT_GROUP(node, prefixsort);
@@ -958,7 +958,7 @@ ExecIncrementalSort(PlanState *pstate)
* - n), so store the current number of processed tuples for use
* in configuring sorting bound.
*/
- SO2_printf("Changing bound_Done from %ld to %ld\n",
+ SO2_printf("Changing bound_Done from " INT64_FORMAT " to " INT64_FORMAT "\n",
node->bound_Done,
Min(node->bound, node->bound_Done + nTuples));
node->bound_Done = Min(node->bound, node->bound_Done + nTuples);