diff options
author | Alexander Korotkov <akorotkov@postgresql.org> | 2023-03-23 00:13:37 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexander Korotkov <akorotkov@postgresql.org> | 2023-03-23 00:26:59 +0300 |
commit | 11470f544e3729c60fab890145b2e839cbc8905e (patch) | |
tree | 8ebd3c5b4aab9023e54e71e892b91a5beb9de8dc /src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c | |
parent | 764da7710bf68eebb2c0facb2f871bc3c7a705b6 (diff) | |
download | postgresql-11470f544e3729c60fab890145b2e839cbc8905e.tar.gz postgresql-11470f544e3729c60fab890145b2e839cbc8905e.zip |
Allow locking updated tuples in tuple_update() and tuple_delete()
Currently, in read committed transaction isolation mode (default), we have the
following sequence of actions when tuple_update()/tuple_delete() finds
the tuple updated by concurrent transaction.
1. Attempt to update/delete tuple with tuple_update()/tuple_delete(), which
returns TM_Updated.
2. Lock tuple with tuple_lock().
3. Re-evaluate plan qual (recheck if we still need to update/delete and
calculate the new tuple for update).
4. Second attempt to update/delete tuple with tuple_update()/tuple_delete().
This attempt should be successful, since the tuple was previously locked.
This patch eliminates step 2 by taking the lock during first
tuple_update()/tuple_delete() call. Heap table access method saves some
efforts by checking the updated tuple once instead of twice. Future
undo-based table access methods, which will start from the latest row version,
can immediately place a lock there.
The code in nodeModifyTable.c is simplified by removing the nested switch/case.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdua-YFw3XTprfutzGp28xXLigFtzNbuFY8yPhqeq6X5kg%40mail.gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev, Pavel Borisov, Vignesh C, Mason Sharp
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Chris Travers
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions