diff options
author | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2015-08-13 13:25:01 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2015-08-13 13:25:22 -0400 |
commit | 6a0779a397a5ec44a37d3f7d1b2e4c4359e06c2f (patch) | |
tree | c55836948c88285d403c86dc856127ce7b38a8af /src/backend/executor/nodeFunctionscan.c | |
parent | 94d626ff5a82422825976c096e250b07657cd6f7 (diff) | |
download | postgresql-6a0779a397a5ec44a37d3f7d1b2e4c4359e06c2f.tar.gz postgresql-6a0779a397a5ec44a37d3f7d1b2e4c4359e06c2f.zip |
Improve regression test case to avoid depending on system catalog stats.
In commit 95f4e59c32866716 I added a regression test case that examined
the plan of a query on system catalogs. That isn't a terribly great idea
because the catalogs tend to change from version to version, or even
within a version if someone makes an unrelated regression-test change that
populates the catalogs a bit differently. Usually I try to make planner
test cases rely on test tables that have not changed since Berkeley days,
but I got sloppy in this case because the submitted crasher example queried
the catalogs and I didn't spend enough time on rewriting it. But it was a
problem waiting to happen, as I was rudely reminded when I tried to port
that patch into Salesforce's Postgres variant :-(. So spend a little more
effort and rewrite the query to not use any system catalogs. I verified
that this version still provokes the Assert if 95f4e59c32866716's code fix
is reverted.
I also removed the EXPLAIN output from the test, as it turns out that the
assertion occurs while considering a plan that isn't the one ultimately
selected anyway; so there's no value in risking any cross-platform
variation in that printout.
Back-patch to 9.2, like the previous patch.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/executor/nodeFunctionscan.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions