Revert no-op changes to BufferGetPage()

The reverted changes were intended to force a choice of whether any
newly-added BufferGetPage() calls needed to be accompanied by a
test of the snapshot age, to support the "snapshot too old"
feature.  Such an accompanying test is needed in about 7% of the
cases, where the page is being used as part of a scan rather than
positioning for other purposes (such as DML or vacuuming).  The
additional effort required for back-patching, and the doubt whether
the intended benefit would really be there, have indicated it is
best just to rely on developers to do the right thing based on
comments and existing usage, as we do with many other conventions.

This change should have little or no effect on generated executable
code.

Motivated by the back-patching pain of Tom Lane and Robert Haas

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c
index b7a2ca7fc61..449aacb6e74 100644
--- a/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ BitmapHeapNext(BitmapHeapScanState *node)
 		 * Okay to fetch the tuple
 		 */
 		targoffset = scan->rs_vistuples[scan->rs_cindex];
-		dp = BufferGetPage(scan->rs_cbuf, NULL, NULL, BGP_NO_SNAPSHOT_TEST);
+		dp = (Page) BufferGetPage(scan->rs_cbuf);
 		lp = PageGetItemId(dp, targoffset);
 		Assert(ItemIdIsNormal(lp));
 
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ bitgetpage(HeapScanDesc scan, TBMIterateResult *tbmres)
 		 * Bitmap is lossy, so we must examine each item pointer on the page.
 		 * But we can ignore HOT chains, since we'll check each tuple anyway.
 		 */
-		Page		dp = BufferGetPage(buffer, NULL, NULL, BGP_NO_SNAPSHOT_TEST);
+		Page		dp = (Page) BufferGetPage(buffer);
 		OffsetNumber maxoff = PageGetMaxOffsetNumber(dp);
 		OffsetNumber offnum;