diff options
| author | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2018-02-27 16:46:52 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2018-02-27 16:46:52 -0500 |
| commit | 51057feaa6bd24b51e6a4715c2090491ef037534 (patch) | |
| tree | 7d80821fda849a1750a5dba0f84d5410e090b796 /src/backend/executor/nodeAppend.c | |
| parent | e98a4de7d23a54a6c861795ad8e920a59613e08b (diff) | |
| download | postgresql-51057feaa6bd24b51e6a4715c2090491ef037534.tar.gz postgresql-51057feaa6bd24b51e6a4715c2090491ef037534.zip | |
Fix up ecpg's configuration so it handles "long long int" in MSVC builds.
Although configure-based builds correctly define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT when
appropriate (in both pg_config.h and ecpg_config.h), builds using the MSVC
scripts failed to do so. This currently has no impact on the backend,
since it uses that symbol nowhere; but it does prevent ecpg from
supporting "long long int". Fix that.
Also, adjust Solution.pm so that in the constructed ecpg_config.h file,
the "#if (_MSC_VER > 1200)" covers only the LONG_LONG_INT-related
#defines, not the whole file. AFAICS this was a thinko on somebody's
part: ENABLE_THREAD_SAFETY should always be defined in Windows builds,
and in branches using USE_INTEGER_DATETIMES, the setting of that shouldn't
depend on the compiler version either. If I'm wrong, I imagine the
buildfarm will say so.
Per bug #15080 from Jonathan Allen; issue diagnosed by Michael Meskes
and Andrew Gierth. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/151935568942.1461.14623890240535309745@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/executor/nodeAppend.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions