aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/executor/execUtils.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2006-07-31 20:09:10 +0000
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2006-07-31 20:09:10 +0000
commit09d3670df3e4593be1d2299a62d982829016b847 (patch)
tree7a62e91c1cf595d0334dd2c196d1c79835cc267b /src/backend/executor/execUtils.c
parent4cd72b53b9975bab5f4ca0792cf4f54c84829404 (diff)
downloadpostgresql-09d3670df3e4593be1d2299a62d982829016b847.tar.gz
postgresql-09d3670df3e4593be1d2299a62d982829016b847.zip
Change the relation_open protocol so that we obtain lock on a relation
(table or index) before trying to open its relcache entry. This fixes race conditions in which someone else commits a change to the relation's catalog entries while we are in process of doing relcache load. Problems of that ilk have been reported sporadically for years, but it was not really practical to fix until recently --- for instance, the recent addition of WAL-log support for in-place updates helped. Along the way, remove pg_am.amconcurrent: all AMs are now expected to support concurrent update.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/executor/execUtils.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/executor/execUtils.c42
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 38 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/execUtils.c b/src/backend/executor/execUtils.c
index 11f2ae20f5e..c879de3bbc1 100644
--- a/src/backend/executor/execUtils.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/execUtils.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
- * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/execUtils.c,v 1.137 2006/07/14 14:52:19 momjian Exp $
+ * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/execUtils.c,v 1.138 2006/07/31 20:09:04 tgl Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@@ -795,12 +795,6 @@ ExecCloseScanRelation(Relation scanrel)
*
* At entry, caller has already opened and locked
* resultRelInfo->ri_RelationDesc.
- *
- * This used to be horribly ugly code, and slow too because it
- * did a sequential scan of pg_index. Now we rely on the relcache
- * to cache a list of the OIDs of the indices associated with any
- * specific relation, and we use the pg_index syscache to get the
- * entries we need from pg_index.
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
void
@@ -840,6 +834,7 @@ ExecOpenIndices(ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo)
/*
* For each index, open the index relation and save pg_index info.
+ * We acquire RowExclusiveLock, signifying we will update the index.
*/
i = 0;
foreach(l, indexoidlist)
@@ -848,31 +843,7 @@ ExecOpenIndices(ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo)
Relation indexDesc;
IndexInfo *ii;
- /*
- * Open and lock the index relation
- *
- * If the index AM supports concurrent updates, obtain
- * RowExclusiveLock to signify that we are updating the index. This
- * locks out only operations that need exclusive access, such as
- * relocating the index to a new tablespace.
- *
- * If the index AM is not safe for concurrent updates, obtain an
- * exclusive lock on the index to lock out other updaters as well as
- * readers (index_beginscan places AccessShareLock on the index).
- *
- * If there are multiple not-concurrent-safe indexes, all backends
- * must lock the indexes in the same order or we will get deadlocks
- * here. This is guaranteed by RelationGetIndexList(), which promises
- * to return the index list in OID order.
- *
- * The locks will be released in ExecCloseIndices.
- */
- indexDesc = index_open(indexOid);
-
- if (indexDesc->rd_am->amconcurrent)
- LockRelation(indexDesc, RowExclusiveLock);
- else
- LockRelation(indexDesc, AccessExclusiveLock);
+ indexDesc = index_open(indexOid, RowExclusiveLock);
/* extract index key information from the index's pg_index info */
ii = BuildIndexInfo(indexDesc);
@@ -907,12 +878,7 @@ ExecCloseIndices(ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo)
continue; /* shouldn't happen? */
/* Drop lock acquired by ExecOpenIndices */
- if (indexDescs[i]->rd_am->amconcurrent)
- UnlockRelation(indexDescs[i], RowExclusiveLock);
- else
- UnlockRelation(indexDescs[i], AccessExclusiveLock);
-
- index_close(indexDescs[i]);
+ index_close(indexDescs[i], RowExclusiveLock);
}
/*