diff options
author | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2016-01-17 19:36:59 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2016-01-17 19:36:59 -0500 |
commit | 65c5fcd353a859da9e61bfb2b92a99f12937de3b (patch) | |
tree | 3d75be487f88d11a27fb0b96809e492838666d72 /src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c | |
parent | 8d290c8ec6c182a4df1d089c21fe84c7912f01fe (diff) | |
download | postgresql-65c5fcd353a859da9e61bfb2b92a99f12937de3b.tar.gz postgresql-65c5fcd353a859da9e61bfb2b92a99f12937de3b.zip |
Restructure index access method API to hide most of it at the C level.
This patch reduces pg_am to just two columns, a name and a handler
function. All the data formerly obtained from pg_am is now provided
in a C struct returned by the handler function. This is similar to
the designs we've adopted for FDWs and tablesample methods. There
are multiple advantages. For one, the index AM's support functions
are now simple C functions, making them faster to call and much less
error-prone, since the C compiler can now check function signatures.
For another, this will make it far more practical to define index access
methods in installable extensions.
A disadvantage is that SQL-level code can no longer see attributes
of index AMs; in particular, some of the crosschecks in the opr_sanity
regression test are no longer possible from SQL. We've addressed that
by adding a facility for the index AM to perform such checks instead.
(Much more could be done in that line, but for now we're content if the
amvalidate functions more or less replace what opr_sanity used to do.)
We might also want to expose some sort of reporting functionality, but
this patch doesn't do that.
Alexander Korotkov, reviewed by Petr JelĂnek, and rather heavily
editorialized on by me.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c b/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c index 7b3a2f498b8..13b04e68f01 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c @@ -15,12 +15,14 @@ #include "postgres.h" +#include "access/amapi.h" #include "access/htup_details.h" #include "access/reloptions.h" #include "access/xact.h" #include "catalog/catalog.h" #include "catalog/index.h" #include "catalog/indexing.h" +#include "catalog/pg_am.h" #include "catalog/pg_opclass.h" #include "catalog/pg_opfamily.h" #include "catalog/pg_tablespace.h" @@ -125,6 +127,7 @@ CheckIndexCompatible(Oid oldId, HeapTuple tuple; Form_pg_index indexForm; Form_pg_am accessMethodForm; + IndexAmRoutine *amRoutine; bool amcanorder; int16 *coloptions; IndexInfo *indexInfo; @@ -160,9 +163,11 @@ CheckIndexCompatible(Oid oldId, accessMethodName))); accessMethodId = HeapTupleGetOid(tuple); accessMethodForm = (Form_pg_am) GETSTRUCT(tuple); - amcanorder = accessMethodForm->amcanorder; + amRoutine = GetIndexAmRoutine(accessMethodForm->amhandler); ReleaseSysCache(tuple); + amcanorder = amRoutine->amcanorder; + /* * Compute the operator classes, collations, and exclusion operators for * the new index, so we can test whether it's compatible with the existing @@ -315,8 +320,9 @@ DefineIndex(Oid relationId, Relation indexRelation; HeapTuple tuple; Form_pg_am accessMethodForm; + IndexAmRoutine *amRoutine; bool amcanorder; - RegProcedure amoptions; + amoptions_function amoptions; Datum reloptions; int16 *coloptions; IndexInfo *indexInfo; @@ -489,31 +495,33 @@ DefineIndex(Oid relationId, } accessMethodId = HeapTupleGetOid(tuple); accessMethodForm = (Form_pg_am) GETSTRUCT(tuple); + amRoutine = GetIndexAmRoutine(accessMethodForm->amhandler); if (strcmp(accessMethodName, "hash") == 0 && RelationNeedsWAL(rel)) ereport(WARNING, (errmsg("hash indexes are not WAL-logged and their use is discouraged"))); - if (stmt->unique && !accessMethodForm->amcanunique) + if (stmt->unique && !amRoutine->amcanunique) ereport(ERROR, (errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED), errmsg("access method \"%s\" does not support unique indexes", accessMethodName))); - if (numberOfAttributes > 1 && !accessMethodForm->amcanmulticol) + if (numberOfAttributes > 1 && !amRoutine->amcanmulticol) ereport(ERROR, (errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED), errmsg("access method \"%s\" does not support multicolumn indexes", accessMethodName))); - if (stmt->excludeOpNames && !OidIsValid(accessMethodForm->amgettuple)) + if (stmt->excludeOpNames && amRoutine->amgettuple == NULL) ereport(ERROR, (errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED), errmsg("access method \"%s\" does not support exclusion constraints", accessMethodName))); - amcanorder = accessMethodForm->amcanorder; - amoptions = accessMethodForm->amoptions; + amcanorder = amRoutine->amcanorder; + amoptions = amRoutine->amoptions; + pfree(amRoutine); ReleaseSysCache(tuple); /* |