diff options
| author | Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org> | 2017-03-09 07:40:36 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org> | 2017-03-09 07:49:29 -0500 |
| commit | 355d3993c53ed62c5b53d020648e4fbcfbf5f155 (patch) | |
| tree | 9a439084995c6553dd035fe218d9864011192b36 /src/backend/commands/explain.c | |
| parent | a72f0365db4168e7d720608fe3ac0ca3fe9355df (diff) | |
| download | postgresql-355d3993c53ed62c5b53d020648e4fbcfbf5f155.tar.gz postgresql-355d3993c53ed62c5b53d020648e4fbcfbf5f155.zip | |
Add a Gather Merge executor node.
Like Gather, we spawn multiple workers and run the same plan in each
one; however, Gather Merge is used when each worker produces the same
output ordering and we want to preserve that output ordering while
merging together the streams of tuples from various workers. (In a
way, Gather Merge is like a hybrid of Gather and MergeAppend.)
This works out to a win if it saves us from having to perform an
expensive Sort. In cases where only a small amount of data would need
to be sorted, it may actually be faster to use a regular Gather node
and then sort the results afterward, because Gather Merge sometimes
needs to wait synchronously for tuples whereas a pure Gather generally
doesn't. But if this avoids an expensive sort then it's a win.
Rushabh Lathia, reviewed and tested by Amit Kapila, Thomas Munro,
and Neha Sharma, and reviewed and revised by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAGPqQf09oPX-cQRpBKS0Gq49Z+m6KBxgxd_p9gX8CKk_d75HoQ@mail.gmail.com
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/commands/explain.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/backend/commands/explain.c | 23 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/explain.c b/src/backend/commands/explain.c index 6fd82e9d52f..c9b55ead3dc 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/explain.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/explain.c @@ -918,6 +918,9 @@ ExplainNode(PlanState *planstate, List *ancestors, case T_Gather: pname = sname = "Gather"; break; + case T_GatherMerge: + pname = sname = "Gather Merge"; + break; case T_IndexScan: pname = sname = "Index Scan"; break; @@ -1411,6 +1414,26 @@ ExplainNode(PlanState *planstate, List *ancestors, ExplainPropertyBool("Single Copy", gather->single_copy, es); } break; + case T_GatherMerge: + { + GatherMerge *gm = (GatherMerge *) plan; + + show_scan_qual(plan->qual, "Filter", planstate, ancestors, es); + if (plan->qual) + show_instrumentation_count("Rows Removed by Filter", 1, + planstate, es); + ExplainPropertyInteger("Workers Planned", + gm->num_workers, es); + if (es->analyze) + { + int nworkers; + + nworkers = ((GatherMergeState *) planstate)->nworkers_launched; + ExplainPropertyInteger("Workers Launched", + nworkers, es); + } + } + break; case T_FunctionScan: if (es->verbose) { |