From a0ed19e0a9efe93b3b83d6e3fe8f77656be253a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Eisentraut Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 10:30:08 +0100 Subject: Use PRI?64 instead of "ll?" in format strings (continued). Continuation of work started in commit 15a79c73, after initial trial. Author: Thomas Munro Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b936d2fb-590d-49c3-a615-92c3a88c6c19%40eisentraut.org --- src/backend/utils/error/elog.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/backend/utils/error/elog.c') diff --git a/src/backend/utils/error/elog.c b/src/backend/utils/error/elog.c index b891dab3bf6..97014c1a5a5 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/error/elog.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/error/elog.c @@ -3152,11 +3152,11 @@ log_status_format(StringInfo buf, const char *format, ErrorData *edata) break; case 'Q': if (padding != 0) - appendStringInfo(buf, "%*lld", padding, - (long long) pgstat_get_my_query_id()); + appendStringInfo(buf, "%*" PRId64, padding, + pgstat_get_my_query_id()); else - appendStringInfo(buf, "%lld", - (long long) pgstat_get_my_query_id()); + appendStringInfo(buf, "%" PRId64, + pgstat_get_my_query_id()); break; default: /* format error - ignore it */ -- cgit v1.2.3