From a0ed19e0a9efe93b3b83d6e3fe8f77656be253a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Eisentraut Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 10:30:08 +0100 Subject: Use PRI?64 instead of "ll?" in format strings (continued). Continuation of work started in commit 15a79c73, after initial trial. Author: Thomas Munro Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b936d2fb-590d-49c3-a615-92c3a88c6c19%40eisentraut.org --- src/backend/utils/adt/xid8funcs.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/backend/utils/adt/xid8funcs.c') diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/xid8funcs.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/xid8funcs.c index 88d798fbf4b..1da3964ca6f 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/adt/xid8funcs.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/xid8funcs.c @@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ TransactionIdInRecentPast(FullTransactionId fxid, TransactionId *extracted_xid) if (!FullTransactionIdPrecedes(fxid, now_fullxid)) ereport(ERROR, (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), - errmsg("transaction ID %llu is in the future", - (unsigned long long) U64FromFullTransactionId(fxid)))); + errmsg("transaction ID %" PRIu64 " is in the future", + U64FromFullTransactionId(fxid)))); /* * TransamVariables->oldestClogXid is protected by XactTruncationLock, but -- cgit v1.2.3