From 78fdb1e50f7fd394505a400b507f70ecffa6d7bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Paquier Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:29:56 +0900 Subject: Mark ParallelMessagePending as sig_atomic_t ParallelMessagePending was previously marked as a boolean which should be fine on modern platforms, but the C standard recommends the use of sig_atomic_t for variables manipulated in signal handlers. Author: Hayato Kuroda Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYAPR01MB58667C15A95A234720F4F876F5529@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com --- src/backend/access/transam/parallel.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/backend/access/transam/parallel.c') diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/parallel.c b/src/backend/access/transam/parallel.c index bc93101ff71..8cba8882239 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/parallel.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/parallel.c @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ typedef struct FixedParallelState int ParallelWorkerNumber = -1; /* Is there a parallel message pending which we need to receive? */ -volatile bool ParallelMessagePending = false; +volatile sig_atomic_t ParallelMessagePending = false; /* Are we initializing a parallel worker? */ bool InitializingParallelWorker = false; -- cgit v1.2.3