aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
...
* Update expected XML output with disabled XMLAlvaro Herrera2018-06-20
| | | | Should have been done in previous commit.
* Accept TEXT and CDATA nodes in XMLTABLE's column_expression.Alvaro Herrera2018-06-20
| | | | | | | | | | | Column expressions that match TEXT or CDATA nodes must return the contents of the nodes themselves, not the content of non-existing children (i.e. the empty string). Author: Markus Winand Reported-by: Markus Winand Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0684A598-002C-42A2-AE12-F024A324EAE4@winand.at
* Add missing includeMagnus Hagander2018-06-20
| | | | Per buildfarm
* Consistently use the term 'partitioned rel' in partprune commentsAlvaro Herrera2018-06-20
| | | | | | | | | We were using 'partition rel' in a few places, which is quite confusing. Author: Amit Langote Reviewed-by: David Rowley Reviewed-by: Michaël Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/fd256561-31a2-4b7e-cd84-d8241e7ebc3f@lab.ntt.co.jp
* Support long option for --pgdata in pg_verify_checksumsMagnus Hagander2018-06-20
| | | | Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
* Don't consider parallel append for parallel unsafe paths.Amit Kapila2018-06-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | Commit ab72716778 allowed Parallel Append paths to be generated for a relation that is not parallel safe. Prevent that from happening. Initial analysis by Tom Lane. Reported-by: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi Author: Amit Kapila and Rajkumar Raghuwanshi Reviewed-by: Amit Khandekar and Robert Haas Discussion:https://postgr.es/m/CAKcux6=tPJ6nJ08r__nU_pmLQiC0xY15Fn0HvG1Cprsjdd9s_Q@mail.gmail.com
* Clarify use of temporary tables within partition treesMichael Paquier2018-06-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since their introduction, partition trees have been a bit lossy regarding temporary relations. Inheritance trees respect the following patterns: 1) a child relation can be temporary if the parent is permanent. 2) a child relation can be temporary if the parent is temporary. 3) a child relation cannot be permanent if the parent is temporary. 4) The use of temporary relations also imply that when both parent and child need to be from the same sessions. Partitions share many similar patterns with inheritance, however the handling of the partition bounds make the situation a bit tricky for case 1) as the partition code bases a lot of its lookup code upon PartitionDesc which does not really look after relpersistence. This causes for example a temporary partition created by session A to be visible by another session B, preventing this session B to create an extra partition which overlaps with the temporary one created by A with a non-intuitive error message. There could be use-cases where mixing permanent partitioned tables with temporary partitions make sense, but that would be a new feature. Partitions respect 2), 3) and 4) already. It is a bit depressing to see those error checks happening in MergeAttributes() whose purpose is different, but that's left as future refactoring work. Back-patch down to 10, which is where partitioning has been introduced, except that default partitions do not apply there. Documentation also includes limitations related to the use of temporary tables with partition trees. Reported-by: David Rowley Author: Amit Langote, Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat, Amit Langote, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f94Ojk0og9GMkRHGt8wHTW=ijq5KzJKuoBoqWLwSVwGmw@mail.gmail.com
* Clarify the README files for the various separate TAP-based test suites.Tom Lane2018-06-19
| | | | | | Explain the difference between "make check" and "make installcheck". Mention the need for --enable-tap-tests (only some of these did so before). Standardize their wording about how to run the tests.
* README: add URLs for openldap installationBruce Momjian2018-06-19
| | | | | | | | Reported-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180521013425.GA4476@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: head
* Track new configure flags introduced for version 11 in pg_config.h.win32Michael Paquier2018-06-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The following set of flags mainly matter when building Postgres code with MSVC and those have been forgotten with latest developments: - HAVE_LDAP_INITIALIZE, added by 35c0754f, and marked as disabled. ldap_initialize() is a non-standard extension that provides a way to use "ldaps" with OpenLDAP, but it is not supported on Windows, and instead the non-standard ldap_sslinit() is used if WIN32 is defined. Per input from Thomas Munro. - HAVE_X509_GET_SIGNATURE_NID, added by 054e8c6c, which is used by SCRAM's channel binding tls-server-end-point. Having this flag disabled would cause this channel binding type to be unsupported for Windows builds. - HAVE_SSL_CLEAR_OPTIONS, added recently as of a364dfa4 to disable SSL compression. - HAVE_ASN1_STRING_GET0_DATA, added by 5c6df67, which is used to track a new compatibility with OpenSSL 1.1.0. This was missing from pg_config.win32.h and is not enabled by default. HAVE_BIO_GET_DATA, HAVE_OPENSSL_INIT_SSL and HAVE_BIO_METH_NEW gain the same treatment. The second and third flags are enabled with this commit, which raises the bar of OpenSSL support to 1.0.2 on Windows as a minimum. As this is the LTS (long-time support) version of OpenSSL community and knowing that all recent installers referred by OpenSSL upstream don't have anymore 1.0.1 or older, we could live with that requirement. In order to allow the code to compile with OpenSSL 1.1.0, all the flags mentioned above need to be enabled in pg_config.h.win32. Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180529211559.GF6632@paquier.xyz
* Allow plperl_sv_to_datum to look through scalar refs.Tom Lane2018-06-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There seems little reason for the policy of throwing error if we find a ref to something other than a hash or array. Recursively look through the ref, instead. This makes the behavior in non-transform cases comparable to what was already instantiated for jsonb_plperl. Note that because we invoke any available transform function before considering the ref case, it's up to each transform function whether it wants to play along with this behavior or do something different. Because the previous behavior was just to throw a useless error, this seems unlikely to create any compatibility issues. Still, given the lack of field complaints so far, seems best not to back-patch. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/28336.1528393969@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Remove obsolete prohibition on function name matching a column name.Tom Lane2018-06-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | ProcedureCreate formerly threw an error if the function to be created has one argument of composite type and the function name matches some column of the composite type. This was a (very non-bulletproof) defense against creating situations where f(x) and x.f are ambiguous. But we don't really need such a defense in the wake of commit b97a3465d, which allows us to deal with such situations fairly cleanly. This behavior also created a dump-and-reload hazard, since a function might be rejected if a conflicting column name had been added to the input composite type later. Hence, let's just drop the check. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOW5sYa3Wp7KozCuzjOdw6PiOYPi6D=VvRybtH2S=2C0SVmRmA@mail.gmail.com
* Consider syntactic form when disambiguating function vs column reference.Tom Lane2018-06-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Postgres has traditionally considered the syntactic forms f(x) and x.f to be equivalent, allowing tricks such as writing a function and then using it as though it were a computed-on-demand column. However, our behavior when both interpretations are feasible left something to be desired: we always chose the column interpretation. This could lead to very surprising results, as in a recent bug report from Neil Conway. It also created a dump-and-reload hazard, since what was a function call in a dumped view could get interpreted as a column reference at reload, if a matching column name had been added to the underlying table since the view was created. What seems better, in ambiguous situations, is to prefer the choice matching the syntactic form of the reference. This seems much less astonishing in general, and it fixes the dump/reload hazard. Although this could be called a bug fix, there have been few complaints and there's some small risk of breaking applications that depend on the old behavior, so no back-patch. It does seem reasonable to slip it into v11, though. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOW5sYa3Wp7KozCuzjOdw6PiOYPi6D=VvRybtH2S=2C0SVmRmA@mail.gmail.com
* Add PGTYPESchar_free() to avoid cross-module problems on Windows.Thomas Munro2018-06-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | On Windows, it is sometimes important for corresponding malloc() and free() calls to be made from the same DLL, since some build options can result in multiple allocators being active at the same time. For that reason we already provided PQfreemem(). This commit adds a similar function for freeing string results allocated by the pgtypes library. Author: Takayuki Tsunakawa Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F8AD5D6%40G01JPEXMBYT05
* Prevent hard failures of standbys caused by recycled WAL segmentsMichael Paquier2018-06-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When a standby's WAL receiver stops reading WAL from a WAL stream, it writes data to the current WAL segment without having priorily zero'ed the page currently written to, which can cause the WAL reader to read junk data from a past recycled segment and then it would try to get a record from it. While sanity checks in place provide most of the protection needed, in some rare circumstances, with chances increasing when a record header crosses a page boundary, then the startup process could fail violently on an allocation failure, as follows: FATAL: invalid memory alloc request size XXX This is confusing for the user and also unhelpful as this requires in the worst case a manual restart of the instance, impacting potentially the availability of the cluster, and this also makes WAL data look like it is in a corrupted state. The chances of seeing failures are higher if the connection between the standby and its root node is unstable, causing WAL pages to be written in the middle. A couple of approaches have been discussed, like zero-ing new WAL pages within the WAL receiver itself but this has the disadvantage of impacting performance of any existing instances as this breaks the sequential writes done by the WAL receiver. This commit deals with the problem with a more simple approach, which has no performance impact without reducing the detection of the problem: if a record is found with a length higher than 1GB for backends, then do not try any allocation and report a soft failure which will force the standby to retry reading WAL. It could be possible that the allocation call passes and that an unnecessary amount of memory is allocated, however follow-up checks on records would just fail, making this allocation short-lived anyway. This patch owes a great deal to Tsunakawa Takayuki for reporting the failure first, and then discussing a couple of potential approaches to the problem. Backpatch down to 9.5, which is where palloc_extended has been introduced. Reported-by: Tsunakawa Takayuki Reviewed-by: Tsunakawa Takayuki Author: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F8B57AD@G01JPEXMBYT05
* Suppress -Wshift-negative-value warnings.Tom Lane2018-06-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | Clean up four places that result in compiler warnings when using recent gcc with this warning class enabled (as seen on buildfarm members calliphoridae, skink, and others). In all these places, this is purely cosmetic, because the shift distance could not be large enough to risk a change of sign, so there's no chance of implementation-dependent behavior. Still, it's easy enough to avoid the warning by casting the shifted value to unsigned, so let's do that. Patch HEAD only, this isn't worth a back-patch.
* Avoid unnecessary use of strncpy in a couple of places in ecpg.Tom Lane2018-06-16
| | | | | | | | | | | Use of strncpy with a length limit based on the source, rather than the destination, is non-idiomatic and draws warnings from gcc 8. Replace with memcpy, which does exactly the same thing in these cases, but with less chance for confusion. Backpatch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21789.1529170195@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Use snprintf not sprintf in pg_waldump's timestamptz_to_str.Tom Lane2018-06-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | This could only cause an issue if strftime returned a ridiculously long timezone name, which seems unlikely; and it wouldn't qualify as a security problem even then, since pg_waldump (nee pg_xlogdump) is a debug tool not part of the server. But gcc 8 has started issuing warnings about it, so let's use snprintf and be safe. Backpatch to 9.3 where this code was added. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21789.1529170195@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Fix some minor error-checking oversights in ParseFuncOrColumn().Tom Lane2018-06-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Recent additions to ParseFuncOrColumn to make it reject non-procedure functions in CALL were neither adequate nor documented. Reorganize the code to ensure uniform results for all the cases that should be rejected. Also, use ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE for this case as well as the converse case of a procedure in a non-CALL context. The original coding used ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_FUNCTION which seems wrong, and is certainly inconsistent with the adjacent wrong-kind-of-routine errors. This reorganization also causes the checks for aggregate decoration with a non-aggregate function to be made in the FUNCDETAIL_COERCION case; that they were not is a long-standing oversight. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14497.1529089235@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Remove AELs from subxids correctly on standbySimon Riggs2018-06-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Issues relate only to subtransactions that hold AccessExclusiveLocks when replayed on standby. Prior to PG10, aborting subtransactions that held an AccessExclusiveLock failed to release the lock until top level commit or abort. 49bff5300d527 fixed that. However, 49bff5300d527 also introduced a similar bug where subtransaction commit would fail to release an AccessExclusiveLock, leaving the lock to be removed sometimes early and sometimes late. This commit fixes that bug also. Backpatch to PG10 needed. Tested by observation. Note need for multi-node isolationtester to improve test coverage for this and other HS cases. Reported-by: Simon Riggs Author: Simon Riggs
* Fix memory leak in BufFileCreateShared().Tatsuo Ishii2018-06-16
| | | | | | | | | Also this commit unifies some duplicated code in makeBufFile() and BufFileOpenShared() into new function makeBufFileCommon(). Author: Antonin Houska Reviewed-By: Thomas Munro, Tatsuo Ishii Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16139.1529049566%40localhost
* Fix off-by-one bug in XactLogCommitRecordAlvaro Herrera2018-06-15
| | | | | | | | | | | Commit 1eb6d6527aae introduced zeroed alignment bytes in the GID field of commit/abort WAL records. Fixup commit cf5a1890592b later changed that representation into a regular cstring with a single terminating zero byte, but it also introduced an off-by-one mistake. Fix that. Author: Nikhil Sontakke Reported-by: Nikhil Sontakke Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMGcDxey6dG1DP34_tJMoWPcp5sPJUAL4K5CayUUXLQSx2GQpA@mail.gmail.com
* Fix memory leak.Tatsuo Ishii2018-06-15
| | | | | | | | Memory is allocated twice for "file" and "files" variables in BufFileOpenShared(). Author: Antonin Houska Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11329.1529045692%40localhost
* Fail BRIN control functions during recovery explicitlyAlvaro Herrera2018-06-14
| | | | | | | | | | | They already fail anyway, but prior to this patch they raise an ugly error message about a lock that cannot be acquired. This just improves the message. Author: Masahiko Sawada Reported-by: Masahiko Sawada Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBZau4g4_NUf3BKNd=CdYK+xaPdtJCzvOC1TxGdTiJx_Q@mail.gmail.com Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh, Alexander Korotkov, Simon Riggs, Michaël Paquier, Álvaro Herrera
* Remove spurious code comments in standby related codeSimon Riggs2018-06-14
| | | | | | | | | GetRunningTransactionData() suggested that subxids were not worth optimizing away if overflowed, yet they have already been removed for that case. Changes to LogAccessExclusiveLock() API forgot to remove the prior comment when it was copied to LockAcquire().
* Remove cut-off bug from RunningTransactionDataSimon Riggs2018-06-14
| | | | | | | | | | 32ac7a118fc17f5 tried to fix a Hot Standby issue reported by Greg Stark, but in doing so caused a different bug to appear, noted by Andres Freund. Revoke the core changes from 32ac7a118fc17f5, leaving in its place a minor change in code ordering and comments to explain for the future.
* Code review for match_clause_to_partition_key().Tom Lane2018-06-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fix inconsistent decisions about NOMATCH vs UNSUPPORTED result codes. If we're going to cater for partkeys that have the same expression and different collations, surely we should also support partkeys with the same expression and different opclasses. Clean up shaky handling of commuted opclauses, eg checking the wrong operator to see what its negator is. This wouldn't cause any actual bugs given a sane opclass definition, but it doesn't seem helpful to expend more code to be less correct. Improve handling of null elements in ScalarArrayOp arrays: in the "op ALL" case, we can conclude they result in an unsatisfiable clause. Minor cosmetic changes and comment improvements.
* Fix some ill-chosen names for globally-visible partition support functions.Tom Lane2018-06-13
| | | | | "compute_hash_value" is particularly gratuitously generic, but IMO all of these ought to have names clearly related to partitioning.
* Fix up run-time partition pruning's use of relcache's partition data.Tom Lane2018-06-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The previous coding saved pointers into the partitioned table's relcache entry, but then closed the relcache entry, causing those pointers to nominally become dangling. Actual trouble would be seen in the field only if a relcache flush occurred mid-query, but that's hardly out of the question. While we could fix this by copying all the data in question at query start, it seems better to just hold the relcache entry open for the whole query. While at it, improve the handling of support-function lookups: do that once per query not once per pruning test. There's still something to be desired here, in that we fail to exploit the possibility of caching data across queries in the fn_extra fields of the relcache's FmgrInfo structs, which could happen if we just used those structs in-place rather than copying them. However, combining that with the possibility of per-query lookups of cross-type comparison functions seems to require changes in the APIs of a lot of the pruning support functions, so it's too invasive to consider as part of this patch. A win would ensue only for complex partition key data types (e.g. arrays), so it may not be worth the trouble. David Rowley and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17850.1528755844@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Exclude files in .git from list of perl filesAndrew Dunstan2018-06-12
| | | | | | | | The .git directory might contain perl files, as hooks, for example. Since we have no control over these they should be excluded from things like our perlcritic checks. Per offline report from Mike Blackwell.
* Fix bugs in vacuum of shared rels, by keeping their relcache entries current.Andres Freund2018-06-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When vacuum processes a relation it uses the corresponding relcache entry's relfrozenxid / relminmxid as a cutoff for when to remove tuples etc. Unfortunately for nailed relations (i.e. critical system catalogs) bugs could frequently lead to the corresponding relcache entry being stale. This set of bugs could cause actual data corruption as vacuum would potentially not remove the correct row versions, potentially reviving them at a later point. After 699bf7d05c some corruptions in this vein were prevented, but the additional error checks could also trigger spuriously. Examples of such errors are: ERROR: found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ... and ERROR: found multixact ... from before relminmxid ... To be caused by this bug the errors have to occur on system catalog tables. The two bugs are: 1) Invalidations for nailed relations were ignored, based on the theory that the relcache entry for such tables doesn't change. Which is largely true, except for fields like relfrozenxid etc. This means that changes to relations vacuumed in other sessions weren't picked up by already existing sessions. Luckily autovacuum doesn't have particularly longrunning sessions. 2) For shared *and* nailed relations, the shared relcache init file was never invalidated while running. That means that for such tables (e.g. pg_authid, pg_database) it's not just already existing sessions that are affected, but even new connections are as well. That explains why the reports usually were about pg_authid et. al. To fix 1), revalidate the rd_rel portion of a relcache entry when invalid. This implies a bit of extra complexity to deal with bootstrapping, but it's not too bad. The fix for 2) is simpler, simply always remove both the shared and local init files. Author: Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Alvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180525203736.crkbg36muzxrjj5e@alap3.anarazel.de https://postgr.es/m/CAMa1XUhKSJd98JW4o9StWPrfS=11bPgG+_GDMxe25TvUY4Sugg@mail.gmail.com https://postgr.es/m/CAKMFJucqbuoDRfxPDX39WhA3vJyxweRg_zDVXzncr6+5wOguWA@mail.gmail.com https://postgr.es/m/CAGewt-ujGpMLQ09gXcUFMZaZsGJC98VXHEFbF-tpPB0fB13K+A@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 9.3-
* Convert debug message from ereport to elogPeter Eisentraut2018-06-12
|
* Fix access to just-closed relcache entry.Tom Lane2018-06-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | It might be impossible for this to cause a problem in non-debug builds, since there'd be no opportunity for the relcache entry to get recycled before the fetch. It blows up nicely with -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE plus valgrind, though. Evidently introduced by careless refactoring in commit f0e44751d. Back-patch accordingly. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/27543.1528758304@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Fix oversight from 9e149c8 with spin-lock handlingMichael Paquier2018-06-12
| | | | | | | | | Calling an external function while a pin-lock is held is a bad idea as those are designed to be short-lived. The stress of a first commit into a large git history may contribute to that. Reported-by: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180611164952.vmxdpdpirdtkdsz6@alap3.anarazel.de
* Improve ExecFindInitialMatchingSubPlans's subplan renumbering logic.Tom Lane2018-06-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | We don't need two passes if we scan child partitions before parents, as that way the children's present_parts are up to date before they're needed. I (tgl) think there's actually a bug being fixed here, for the case of an intermediate partitioned table with no direct leaf children, but haven't attempted to construct a test case to prove it. David Rowley Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f-6GODRNgEtdPxCnAPme2h2hTztB6LmtfdmcYAAOE0kQg@mail.gmail.com
* Improve commentary about run-time partition pruning data structures.Tom Lane2018-06-11
| | | | | | | | No code changes except for a couple of new Asserts. David Rowley and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f-6GODRNgEtdPxCnAPme2h2hTztB6LmtfdmcYAAOE0kQg@mail.gmail.com
* Adjust error messagePeter Eisentraut2018-06-11
| | | | | Makes it look more similar to other ones, and avoids the need for pluralization.
* Don't needlessly check the partition contraint twiceAlvaro Herrera2018-06-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Starting with commit f0e44751d717, ExecConstraints was in charge of running the partition constraint; commit 19c47e7c8202 modified that so that caller could request to skip that checking depending on some conditions, but that commit and 15ce775faa42 together introduced a small bug there which caused ExecInsert to request skipping the constraint check but have this not be honored -- in effect doing the check twice. This could have been fixed in a very small patch, but on further analysis of the involved function and its callsites, it turns out to be simpler to give the responsibility of checking the partition constraint fully to the caller, and return ExecConstraints to its original (pre-partitioning) shape where it only checked tuple descriptor-related constraints. Each caller must do partition constraint checking on its own schedule, which is more convenient after commit 2f178441044 anyway. Reported-by: David Rowley Author: David Rowley, Álvaro Herrera Reviewed-by: Amit Langote, Amit Khandekar, Simon Riggs Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f8w8+awsxgea8wt7_UX8qzOQ=Tm1LD+U1fHqBAkXxkW2w@mail.gmail.com
* Move perlcritic files to new perlcheck directoryAndrew Dunstan2018-06-11
|
* Add a script to detect perl compile time errors and warningsAndrew Dunstan2018-06-11
| | | | | | Also add a function that centralizes the logic for locating all our perl files and use it in pgperlcritic and pgperltidy as well as the new pgperlcheck.
* Fix run-time partition pruning code to handle NULL values properly.Tom Lane2018-06-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The previous coding just ignored pruning constraints that compare a partition key to a null-valued expression. This is silly, since really what we can do there is conclude that all partitions are rejected: the pruning operator is known strict so the comparison must always fail. This also fixes the logic to not ignore constisnull for a Const comparison value. That's probably an unreachable case, since the planner would normally have simplified away a strict operator with a constant-null input. But this code has no business assuming that. David Rowley, per a gripe from me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/26279.1528670981@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Make new error code name match SQL standard more closelyPeter Eisentraut2018-06-11
| | | | Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/dff3d555-bea4-ac24-29b2-29521b9d08e8%402ndquadrant.com
* Fix a couple of bugs with replication slot advancing featureMichael Paquier2018-06-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A review of the code has showed up a couple of issues fixed by this commit: - Physical slots have been using the confirmed LSN position as a start comparison point which is always 0/0, instead use the restart LSN position (logical slots need to use the confirmed LSN position, which was correct). - The actual slot update was incorrect for both physical and logical slots. Physical slots need to use their restart_lsn as base comparison point (confirmed_flush was used because of previous point), and logical slots need to begin reading WAL from restart_lsn (confirmed_flush was used as well), while confirmed_flush is compiled depending on the decoding context and record read, and is the LSN position returned back to the caller. - Never return 0/0 if a slot cannot be advanced. This way, if a slot is advanced while the activity is idle, then the same position is returned to the caller over and over without raising an error. Instead return the LSN the slot has been advanced to. With repetitive calls, the same position is returned hence caller can directly monitor the difference in progress in bytes by doing simply LSN difference calculations, which should be monotonic. Note that as the slot is owned by the backend advancing it, then the read of those fields is fine lock-less, while updates need to happen while the slot mutex is held, so fix that on the way as well. Other locks for in-memory data of replication slots have been already fixed previously. Some of those issues have been pointed out by Petr and Simon during the patch, while I noticed some of them after looking at the code. This also visibly takes of a recently-discovered bug causing assertion failures which can be triggered by a two-step slot forwarding which first advanced the slot to a WAL page boundary and secondly advanced it to the latest position, say 'FF/FFFFFFF' to make sure that the newest LSN is used as forward point. It would have been nice to drop a test for that, but the set of operators working on pg_lsn limits it, so this is left for a future exercise. Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Petr Jelinek, Simon Riggs Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANP8+jLyS=X-CAk59BJnsxKQfjwrmKicHQykyn52Qj-Q=9GLCw@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2840048a-1184-417a-9da8-3299d207a1d7%40postgrespro.ru
* Assorted cosmetic cleanup of run-time-partition-pruning code.Tom Lane2018-06-10
| | | | | | | | | | Use "subplan" rather than "subnode" to refer to the child plans of a partitioning Append; this seems a bit more specific and hence clearer. Improve assorted comments. No non-cosmetic changes. David Rowley and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFj8pRBjrufA3ocDm8o4LPGNye9Y+pm1b9kCwode4X04CULG3g@mail.gmail.com
* Relocate partition pruning structs to a saner place.Tom Lane2018-06-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | These struct definitions were originally dropped into primnodes.h, which is a poor choice since that's mainly intended for primitive expression node types; these are not in that category. What they are is auxiliary info in Plan trees, so move them to plannodes.h. For consistency, also relocate some related code that was apparently placed with the aid of a dartboard. There's no interesting code changes in this commit, just reshuffling. David Rowley and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFj8pRBjrufA3ocDm8o4LPGNye9Y+pm1b9kCwode4X04CULG3g@mail.gmail.com
* Improve run-time partition pruning to handle any stable expression.Tom Lane2018-06-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The initial coding of the run-time-pruning feature only coped with cases where the partition key(s) are compared to Params. That is a bit silly; we can allow it to work with any non-Var-containing stable expression, as long as we take special care with expressions containing PARAM_EXEC Params. The code is hardly any longer this way, and it's considerably clearer (IMO at least). Per gripe from Pavel Stehule. David Rowley, whacked around a bit by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFj8pRBjrufA3ocDm8o4LPGNye9Y+pm1b9kCwode4X04CULG3g@mail.gmail.com
* Fix and document lock handling for in-memory replication slot dataMichael Paquier2018-06-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | While debugging issues on HEAD for the new slot forwarding feature of Postgres 11, some monitoring of the code surrounding in-memory slot data has proved that the lock handling may cause inconsistent data to be read by read-only callers of slot functions, particularly pg_get_replication_slots() which fetches data for the system view pg_replication_slots, or modules looking directly at slot information. The code paths involved in those problems concern logical decoding initialization (down to 9.4) and WAL reservation for slots (new as of 10). A set of comments documenting all the lock handlings, particularly the dependency with LW locks for slots and the in_use flag as well as the internal mutex lock is added, based on a suggested by Simon Riggs. Some of the fixed code exists down to 9.4 where WAL decoding has been introduced, but as those race conditions are really unlikely going to happen as those concern code paths for slot and decoding creation, just fix the problem on HEAD. Author: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180528085747.GA27845@paquier.xyz
* Limit Parallel Hash's bucket array to MaxAllocSize.Thomas Munro2018-06-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | Make sure that we don't exceed MaxAllocSize when increasing the number of buckets. Perhaps later we'll remove that limit and use DSA_ALLOC_HUGE, but for now just prevent further increases like the non-parallel code. This change avoids the error from bug report #15225. Author: Thomas Munro Reviewed-By: Tom Lane Reported-by: Frits Jalvingh Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/152802081668.26724.16985037679312485972%40wrigleys.postgresql.org
* Fix typo in JIT README.Peter Geoghegan2018-06-09
| | | | | Author: Daniel Gustafsson Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3747D478-41F9-439F-8074-AC81A5C76346@yesql.se
* Teach SHOW ALL to honor pg_read_all_settings membershipAlvaro Herrera2018-06-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Also, fix the pg_settings view to display source filename and line number when invoked by a pg_read_all_settings member. This addition by me (Álvaro). Also, fix wording of the comment in GetConfigOption regarding the restriction it implements, renaming the parameter for extra clarity. Noted by Michaël. These were all oversight in commit 25fff40798fc; backpatch to pg10, where that commit first appeared. Author: Laurenz Albe Reviewed-by: Michaël Paquier, Álvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1519917758.6586.8.camel@cybertec.at
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-07-16 05:26:34 +0000