aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/parser/parse_utilcmd.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
...
* Add hash partitioning.Robert Haas2017-11-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Hash partitioning is useful when you want to partition a growing data set evenly. This can be useful to keep table sizes reasonable, which makes maintenance operations such as VACUUM faster, or to enable partition-wise join. At present, we still depend on constraint exclusion for partitioning pruning, and the shape of the partition constraints for hash partitioning is such that that doesn't work. Work is underway to fix that, which should both improve performance and make partitioning pruning work with hash partitioning. Amul Sul, reviewed and tested by Dilip Kumar, Ashutosh Bapat, Yugo Nagata, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi, Jesper Pedersen, and by me. A few final tweaks also by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAAJ_b96fhpJAP=ALbETmeLk1Uni_GFZD938zgenhF49qgDTjaQ@mail.gmail.com
* Change TRUE/FALSE to true/falsePeter Eisentraut2017-11-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The lower case spellings are C and C++ standard and are used in most parts of the PostgreSQL sources. The upper case spellings are only used in some files/modules. So standardize on the standard spellings. The APIs for ICU, Perl, and Windows define their own TRUE and FALSE, so those are left as is when using those APIs. In code comments, we use the lower-case spelling for the C concepts and keep the upper-case spelling for the SQL concepts. Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
* After a MINVALUE/MAXVALUE bound, allow only more of the same.Robert Haas2017-09-15
| | | | | | | | | | In the old syntax, which used UNBOUNDED, we had a similar restriction, but commit d363d42bb9a4399a0207bd3b371c966e22e06bd3, which changed the syntax, eliminated it. Put it back. Patch by me, reviewed by Dean Rasheed. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobs+pLPC27tS3gOpEAxAffHrq5w509cvkwTf9pF6cWYbg@mail.gmail.com
* Allow a partitioned table to have a default partition.Robert Haas2017-09-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Any tuples that don't route to any other partition will route to the default partition. Jeevan Ladhe, Beena Emerson, Ashutosh Bapat, Rahila Syed, and Robert Haas, with review and testing at various stages by (at least) Rushabh Lathia, Keith Fiske, Amit Langote, Amul Sul, Rajkumar Raghuanshi, Sven Kunze, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Thom Brown, Rafia Sabih, and Dilip Kumar. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAH2L28tbN4SYyhS7YV1YBWcitkqbhSWfQCy0G=apRcC_PEO-bg@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAOG9ApEYj34fWMcvBMBQ-YtqR9fTdXhdN82QEKG0SVZ6zeL1xg@mail.gmail.com
* Change tupledesc->attrs[n] to TupleDescAttr(tupledesc, n).Andres Freund2017-08-20
| | | | | | | | | | | This is a mechanical change in preparation for a later commit that will change the layout of TupleDesc. Introducing a macro to abstract the details of where attributes are stored will allow us to change that in separate step and revise it in future. Author: Thomas Munro, editorialized by Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0ZtQ-SpsgCyzzYpsXS6e=kZWqk3g5Ygn3MDV7A8dabUA@mail.gmail.com
* Final pgindent + perltidy run for v10.Tom Lane2017-08-14
|
* Allow a foreign table CHECK constraint to be initially NOT VALID.Robert Haas2017-08-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | For a table, the constraint can be considered validated immediately, because the table must be empty. But for a foreign table this is not necessarily the case. Fixes a bug in commit f27a6b15e6566fba7748d0d9a3fc5bcfd52c4a1b. Amit Langote, with some changes by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/d2b7419f-4a71-cf86-cc99-bfd0f359a1ea@lab.ntt.co.jp
* Teach map_partition_varattnos to handle whole-row expressions.Robert Haas2017-08-03
| | | | | | | | | | Otherwise, partitioned tables with RETURNING expressions or subject to a WITH CHECK OPTION do not work properly. Amit Langote, reviewed by Amit Khandekar and Etsuro Fujita. A few comment changes by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/9a39df80-871e-6212-0684-f93c83be4097@lab.ntt.co.jp
* Use MINVALUE/MAXVALUE instead of UNBOUNDED for range partition bounds.Dean Rasheed2017-07-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously, UNBOUNDED meant no lower bound when used in the FROM list, and no upper bound when used in the TO list, which was OK for single-column range partitioning, but problematic with multiple columns. For example, an upper bound of (10.0, UNBOUNDED) would not be collocated with a lower bound of (10.0, UNBOUNDED), thus making it difficult or impossible to define contiguous multi-column range partitions in some cases. Fix this by using MINVALUE and MAXVALUE instead of UNBOUNDED to represent a partition column that is unbounded below or above respectively. This syntax removes any ambiguity, and ensures that if one partition's lower bound equals another partition's upper bound, then the partitions are contiguous. Also drop the constraint prohibiting finite values after an unbounded column, and just document the fact that any values after MINVALUE or MAXVALUE are ignored. Previously it was necessary to repeat UNBOUNDED multiple times, which was needlessly verbose. Note: Forces a post-PG 10 beta2 initdb. Report by Amul Sul, original patch by Amit Langote with some additional hacking by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAJ_b947mowpLdxL3jo3YLKngRjrq9+Ej4ymduQTfYR+8=YAYQ@mail.gmail.com
* Phase 3 of pgindent updates.Tom Lane2017-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Don't move parenthesized lines to the left, even if that means they flow past the right margin. By default, BSD indent lines up statement continuation lines that are within parentheses so that they start just to the right of the preceding left parenthesis. However, traditionally, if that resulted in the continuation line extending to the right of the desired right margin, then indent would push it left just far enough to not overrun the margin, if it could do so without making the continuation line start to the left of the current statement indent. That makes for a weird mix of indentations unless one has been completely rigid about never violating the 80-column limit. This behavior has been pretty universally panned by Postgres developers. Hence, disable it with indent's new -lpl switch, so that parenthesized lines are always lined up with the preceding left paren. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Phase 2 of pgindent updates.Tom Lane2017-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Handle unqualified SEQUENCE NAME options properly in parse_utilcmd.c.Tom Lane2017-06-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | generateSerialExtraStmts() was sloppy about handling the case where SEQUENCE NAME is given with a not-schema-qualified name. It was generating a CreateSeqStmt with an unqualified sequence name, and an AlterSeqStmt whose "owned_by" DefElem contained a T_String Value with a null string pointer in the schema-name position. The generated nextval() argument was also underqualified. This accidentally failed to fail at runtime, but only so long as the current default creation namespace at runtime is the right namespace. That's bogus; the parse-time transformation is supposed to be inserting the right schema name in all cases, so as to avoid any possible skew in that selection. I'm not sure this could fail in pg_dump's usage, but it's still wrong; we have had real bugs in this area before adopting the policy that parse_utilcmd.c should generate only fully-qualified auxiliary commands. A slightly lesser problem, which is what led me to notice this in the first place, is that pprint() dumped core on the AlterSeqStmt because of the bogus T_String. Noted while poking into the open problem with ALTER SEQUENCE breaking pg_upgrade.
* Code review focused on new node types added by partitioning support.Tom Lane2017-05-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fix failure to check that we got a plain Const from const-simplification of a coercion request. This is the cause of bug #14666 from Tian Bing: there is an int4 to money cast, but it's only stable not immutable (because of dependence on lc_monetary), resulting in a FuncExpr that the code was miserably unequipped to deal with, or indeed even to notice that it was failing to deal with. Add test cases around this coercion behavior. In view of the above, sprinkle the code liberally with castNode() macros, in hope of catching the next such bug a bit sooner. Also, change some functions that were randomly declared to take Node* to take more specific pointer types. And change some struct fields that were declared Node* but could be given more specific types, allowing removal of assorted explicit casts. Place PARTITION_MAX_KEYS check a bit closer to the code it's protecting. Likewise check only-one-key-for-list-partitioning restriction in a less random place. Avoid not-per-project-style usages like !strcmp(...). Fix assorted failures to avoid scribbling on the input of parse transformation. I'm not sure how necessary this is, but it's entirely silly for these functions to be expending cycles to avoid that and not getting it right. Add guards against partitioning on system columns. Put backend/nodes/ support code into an order that matches handling of these node types elsewhere. Annotate the fact that somebody added location fields to PartitionBoundSpec and PartitionRangeDatum but forgot to handle them in outfuncs.c/readfuncs.c. This is fairly harmless for production purposes (since readfuncs.c would just substitute -1 anyway) but it's still bogus. It's not worth forcing a post-beta1 initdb just to fix this, but if we have another reason to force initdb before 10.0, we should go back and clean this up. Contrariwise, somebody added location fields to PartitionElem and PartitionSpec but forgot to teach exprLocation() about them. Consolidate duplicative code in transformPartitionBound(). Improve a couple of error messages. Improve assorted commentary. Re-pgindent the files touched by this patch; this affects a few comment blocks that must have been added quite recently. Report: https://postgr.es/m/20170524024550.29935.14396@wrigleys.postgresql.org
* Post-PG 10 beta1 pgindent runBruce Momjian2017-05-17
| | | | perltidy run not included.
* Disallow finite partition bound following earlier UNBOUNDED column.Robert Haas2017-05-09
| | | | | | Amit Langote, per an observation by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYWnV2GMnYLG-Czsix-E1WGAbo4D+0tx7t9NdfYBDMFsA@mail.gmail.com
* Fix crash when partitioned column specified twice.Robert Haas2017-04-28
| | | | | | Amit Langote, reviewed by Beena Emerson Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/6ed23d3d-c09d-4cbc-3628-0a8a32f750f4@lab.ntt.co.jp
* Improve castNode notation by introducing list-extraction-specific variants.Tom Lane2017-04-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This extends the castNode() notation introduced by commit 5bcab1114 to provide, in one step, extraction of a list cell's pointer and coercion to a concrete node type. For example, "lfirst_node(Foo, lc)" is the same as "castNode(Foo, lfirst(lc))". Almost half of the uses of castNode that have appeared so far include a list extraction call, so this is pretty widely useful, and it saves a few more keystrokes compared to the old way. As with the previous patch, back-patch the addition of these macros to pg_list.h, so that the notation will be available when back-patching. Patch by me, after an idea of Andrew Gierth's. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14197.1491841216@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Identity columnsPeter Eisentraut2017-04-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | This is the SQL standard-conforming variant of PostgreSQL's serial columns. It fixes a few usability issues that serial columns have: - CREATE TABLE / LIKE copies default but refers to same sequence - cannot add/drop serialness with ALTER TABLE - dropping default does not drop sequence - need to grant separate privileges to sequence - other slight weirdnesses because serial is some kind of special macro Reviewed-by: Vitaly Burovoy <vitaly.burovoy@gmail.com>
* Cast result of copyObject() to correct typePeter Eisentraut2017-03-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | copyObject() is declared to return void *, which allows easily assigning the result independent of the input, but it loses all type checking. If the compiler supports typeof or something similar, cast the result to the input type. This creates a greater amount of type safety. In some cases, where the result is assigned to a generic type such as Node * or Expr *, new casts are now necessary, but in general casts are now unnecessary in the normal case and indicate that something unusual is happening. Reviewed-by: Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com>
* Remove objname/objargs split for referring to objectsPeter Eisentraut2017-03-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In simpler times, it might have worked to refer to all kinds of objects by a list of name components and an optional argument list. But this doesn't work for all objects, which has resulted in a collection of hacks to place various other nodes types into these fields, which have to be unpacked at the other end. This makes it also weird to represent lists of such things in the grammar, because they would have to be lists of singleton lists, to make the unpacking work consistently. The other problem is that keeping separate name and args fields makes it awkward to deal with lists of functions. Change that by dropping the objargs field and have objname, renamed to object, be a generic Node, which can then be flexibly assigned and managed using the normal Node mechanisms. In many cases it will still be a List of names, in some cases it will be a string Value, for types it will be the existing Typename, for functions it will now use the existing ObjectWithArgs node type. Some of the more obscure object types still use somewhat arbitrary nested lists. Reviewed-by: Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
* Make more use of castNode()Peter Eisentraut2017-02-21
|
* Avoid crash in ALTER TABLE not_partitioned DETACH PARTITION.Robert Haas2017-02-16
| | | | Amit Langote, reviewed and slightly changed by me.
* Add CREATE SEQUENCE AS <data type> clausePeter Eisentraut2017-02-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This stores a data type, required to be an integer type, with the sequence. The sequences min and max values default to the range supported by the type, and they cannot be set to values exceeding that range. The internal implementation of the sequence is not affected. Change the serial types to create sequences of the appropriate type. This makes sure that the min and max values of the sequence for a serial column match the range of values supported by the table column. So the sequence can no longer overflow the table column. This also makes monitoring for sequence exhaustion/wraparound easier, which currently requires various contortions to cross-reference the sequences with the table columns they are used with. This commit also effectively reverts the pg_sequence column reordering in f3b421da5f4addc95812b9db05a24972b8fd9739, because the new seqtypid column allows us to fill the hole in the struct and create a more natural overall column ordering. Reviewed-by: Steve Singer <steve@ssinger.info> Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
* Fix typos in comments.Heikki Linnakangas2017-02-06
| | | | | | | | | Backpatch to all supported versions, where applicable, to make backpatching of future fixes go more smoothly. Josh Soref Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CACZqfqCf+5qRztLPgmmosr-B0Ye4srWzzw_mo4c_8_B_mtjmJQ@mail.gmail.com
* Update copyright via script for 2017Bruce Momjian2017-01-03
|
* Fix CREATE TABLE ... LIKE ... WITH OIDS.Tom Lane2016-12-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Having a WITH OIDS specification should result in the creation of an OID column, but commit b943f502b broke that in the case that there were LIKE tables without OIDS. Commentary in that patch makes it look like this was intentional, but if so it was based on a faulty reading of what inheritance does: the parent tables can add an OID column, but they can't subtract one. AFAICS, the behavior ought to be that you get an OID column if any of the inherited tables, LIKE tables, or WITH clause ask for one. Also, revert that patch's unnecessary split of transformCreateStmt's loop over the tableElts list into two passes. That seems to have been based on a misunderstanding as well: we already have two-pass processing here, we don't need three passes. Per bug #14474 from Jeff Dafoe. Back-patch to 9.6 where the misbehavior was introduced. Report: https://postgr.es/m/20161222145304.25620.47445@wrigleys.postgresql.org
* Implement table partitioning.Robert Haas2016-12-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Table partitioning is like table inheritance and reuses much of the existing infrastructure, but there are some important differences. The parent is called a partitioned table and is always empty; it may not have indexes or non-inherited constraints, since those make no sense for a relation with no data of its own. The children are called partitions and contain all of the actual data. Each partition has an implicit partitioning constraint. Multiple inheritance is not allowed, and partitioning and inheritance can't be mixed. Partitions can't have extra columns and may not allow nulls unless the parent does. Tuples inserted into the parent are automatically routed to the correct partition, so tuple-routing ON INSERT triggers are not needed. Tuple routing isn't yet supported for partitions which are foreign tables, and it doesn't handle updates that cross partition boundaries. Currently, tables can be range-partitioned or list-partitioned. List partitioning is limited to a single column, but range partitioning can involve multiple columns. A partitioning "column" can be an expression. Because table partitioning is less general than table inheritance, it is hoped that it will be easier to reason about properties of partitions, and therefore that this will serve as a better foundation for a variety of possible optimizations, including query planner optimizations. The tuple routing based which this patch does based on the implicit partitioning constraints is an example of this, but it seems likely that many other useful optimizations are also possible. Amit Langote, reviewed and tested by Robert Haas, Ashutosh Bapat, Amit Kapila, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi, Corey Huinker, Jaime Casanova, Rushabh Lathia, Erik Rijkers, among others. Minor revisions by me.
* Improve parser's and planner's handling of set-returning functions.Tom Lane2016-09-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Teach the parser to reject misplaced set-returning functions during parse analysis using p_expr_kind, in much the same way as we do for aggregates and window functions (cf commit eaccfded9). While this isn't complete (it misses nesting-based restrictions), it's much better than the previous error reporting for such cases, and it allows elimination of assorted ad-hoc expression_returns_set() error checks. We could add nesting checks later if it seems important to catch all cases at parse time. There is one case the parser will now throw error for although previous versions allowed it, which is SRFs in the tlist of an UPDATE. That never behaved sensibly (since it's ill-defined which generated row should be used to perform the update) and it's hard to see why it should not be treated as an error. It's a release-note-worthy change though. Also, add a new Query field hasTargetSRFs reporting whether there are any SRFs in the targetlist (including GROUP BY/ORDER BY expressions). The parser can now set that basically for free during parse analysis, and we can use it in a number of places to avoid expression_returns_set searches. (There will be more such checks soon.) In some places, this allows decontorting the logic since it's no longer expensive to check for SRFs in the tlist --- so I made the checks parallel to the handling of hasAggs/hasWindowFuncs wherever it seemed appropriate. catversion bump because adding a Query field changes stored rules. Andres Freund and Tom Lane Discussion: <24639.1473782855@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Add location field to DefElemPeter Eisentraut2016-09-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add a location field to the DefElem struct, used to parse many utility commands. Update various error messages to supply error position information. To propogate the error position information in a more systematic way, create a ParseState in standard_ProcessUtility() and pass that to interested functions implementing the utility commands. This seems better than passing the query string and then reassembling a parse state ad hoc, which violates the encapsulation of the ParseState type. Reviewed-by: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
* Improve documentation about CREATE TABLE ... LIKE.Tom Lane2016-07-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The docs failed to explain that LIKE INCLUDING INDEXES would not preserve the names of indexes and associated constraints. Also, it wasn't mentioned that EXCLUDE constraints would be copied by this option. The latter oversight seems enough of a documentation bug to justify back-patching. In passing, do some minor copy-editing in the same area, and add an entry for LIKE under "Compatibility", since it's not exactly a faithful implementation of the standard's feature. Discussion: <20160728151154.AABE64016B@smtp.hushmail.com>
* pgindent run for 9.6Robert Haas2016-06-09
|
* Revert CREATE INDEX ... INCLUDING ...Teodor Sigaev2016-04-08
| | | | | | It's not ready yet, revert two commits 690c543550b0d2852060c18d270cdb534d339d9a - unstable test output 386e3d7609c49505e079c40c65919d99feb82505 - patch itself
* CREATE INDEX ... INCLUDING (column[, ...])Teodor Sigaev2016-04-08
| | | | | | | | | | Now indexes (but only B-tree for now) can contain "extra" column(s) which doesn't participate in index structure, they are just stored in leaf tuples. It allows to use index only scan by using single index instead of two or more indexes. Author: Anastasia Lubennikova with minor editorializing by me Reviewers: David Rowley, Peter Geoghegan, Jeff Janes
* Support CREATE ACCESS METHODAlvaro Herrera2016-03-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This enables external code to create access methods. This is useful so that extensions can add their own access methods which can be formally tracked for dependencies, so that DROP operates correctly. Also, having explicit support makes pg_dump work correctly. Currently only index AMs are supported, but we expect different types to be added in the future. Authors: Alexander Korotkov, Petr Jelínek Reviewed-By: Teodor Sigaev, Petr Jelínek, Jim Nasby Commitfest-URL: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/9/353/ Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAPpHfdsXwZmojm6Dx+TJnpYk27kT4o7Ri6X_4OSWcByu1Rm+VA@mail.gmail.com
* Move pg_constraint.h function declarations to new file pg_constraint_fn.h.Tom Lane2016-02-11
| | | | | | | | | | | A pending patch requires exporting a function returning Bitmapset from catalog/pg_constraint.c. As things stand, that would mean including nodes/bitmapset.h in pg_constraint.h, which might be hazardous for the client-side includability of that header. It's not entirely clear whether any client-side code needs to include pg_constraint.h, but it seems prudent to assume that there is some such code somewhere. Therefore, split off the function definitions into a new file pg_constraint_fn.h, similarly to what we've done for some other catalog header files.
* Restructure index access method API to hide most of it at the C level.Tom Lane2016-01-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch reduces pg_am to just two columns, a name and a handler function. All the data formerly obtained from pg_am is now provided in a C struct returned by the handler function. This is similar to the designs we've adopted for FDWs and tablesample methods. There are multiple advantages. For one, the index AM's support functions are now simple C functions, making them faster to call and much less error-prone, since the C compiler can now check function signatures. For another, this will make it far more practical to define index access methods in installable extensions. A disadvantage is that SQL-level code can no longer see attributes of index AMs; in particular, some of the crosschecks in the opr_sanity regression test are no longer possible from SQL. We've addressed that by adding a facility for the index AM to perform such checks instead. (Much more could be done in that line, but for now we're content if the amvalidate functions more or less replace what opr_sanity used to do.) We might also want to expose some sort of reporting functionality, but this patch doesn't do that. Alexander Korotkov, reviewed by Petr Jelínek, and rather heavily editorialized on by me.
* Update copyright for 2016Bruce Momjian2016-01-02
| | | | Backpatch certain files through 9.1
* Mark CHECK constraints declared NOT VALID valid if created with table.Robert Haas2015-12-16
| | | | | | | | FOREIGN KEY constraints have behaved this way for a long time, but for some reason the behavior of CHECK constraints has been inconsistent up until now. Amit Langote and Amul Sul, with assorted tweaks by me.
* Fix typos in comments.Robert Haas2015-10-22
| | | | CharSyam
* Have CREATE TABLE LIKE add OID column if any LIKEd table has oneBruce Momjian2015-10-05
| | | | | | | Also, process constraints for LIKEd tables at the end so an OID column can be referenced in a constraint. Report by Tom Lane
* pgindent run for 9.5Bruce Momjian2015-05-23
|
* Fix another test for RELKIND_RELATION that should allow foreign tables now.Tom Lane2015-04-28
| | | | | | | | | | I thought I'd gone through all of these before, but a fresh review found this one too. (Perhaps it would be better to just delete this test and let the failure occur later, but for the moment I'll preserve the logic.) The case that this was rejecting is like CREATE FOREIGN TABLE ft (f1 int ...) ...; CREATE TABLE c1 (UNIQUE(f1)) INHERITS(ft);
* Add comments warning against generalizing default_with_oids.Tom Lane2015-04-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | pg_dump has historically assumed that default_with_oids affects only plain tables and not other relkinds. Conceivably we could make it apply to some newly invented relkind if we did so from the get-go, but changing the behavior for existing object types will break existing dump scripts. Add code comments warning about this interaction. Also, make sure that default_with_oids doesn't cause parse_utilcmd.c to think that CREATE FOREIGN TABLE will create an OID column. I think this is only a latent bug right now, since we don't allow UNIQUE/PKEY constraints in CREATE FOREIGN TABLE, but it's better to be consistent and future-proof.
* Revert: Honor OID status of CREATE LIKE'd tablesBruce Momjian2015-04-25
| | | | | | Reverts d992f8a8961c09ec219373ffe2b5e6473febd065 Report by Tom Lane
* Honor OID status of CREATE LIKE'd tablesBruce Momjian2015-04-20
| | | | | | Previously, tables created by CREATE LIKE never had OIDs. Report by Tom Lane
* Transform ALTER TABLE/SET TYPE/USING expr during parse analysisAlvaro Herrera2015-04-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This lets later stages have access to the transformed expression; in particular it allows DDL-deparsing code during event triggers to pass the transformed expression to ruleutils.c, so that the complete command can be deparsed. This shuffles the timing of the transform calls a bit: previously, nothing was transformed during parse analysis, and only the RELKIND_RELATION case was being handled during execution. After this patch, all expressions are transformed during parse analysis (including those for relkinds other than RELATION), and the error for other relation kinds is thrown only during execution. So we do more work than before to reject some bogus cases. That seems acceptable.
* Setup cursor position for schema-qualified elementsAlvaro Herrera2015-03-18
| | | | | | | | This makes any errors thrown while looking up such schemas report the position of the error. Author: Ryan Kelly Reviewed by: Jeevan Chalke, Tom Lane
* Allow CURRENT/SESSION_USER to be used in certain commandsAlvaro Herrera2015-03-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commands such as ALTER USER, ALTER GROUP, ALTER ROLE, GRANT, and the various ALTER OBJECT / OWNER TO, as well as ad-hoc clauses related to roles such as the AUTHORIZATION clause of CREATE SCHEMA, the FOR clause of CREATE USER MAPPING, and the FOR ROLE clause of ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES can now take the keywords CURRENT_USER and SESSION_USER as user specifiers in place of an explicit user name. This commit also fixes some quite ugly handling of special standards- mandated syntax in CREATE USER MAPPING, which in particular would fail to work in presence of a role named "current_user". The special role specifiers PUBLIC and NONE also have more consistent handling now. Also take the opportunity to add location tracking to user specifiers. Authors: Kyotaro Horiguchi. Heavily reworked by Álvaro Herrera. Reviewed by: Rushabh Lathia, Adam Brightwell, Marti Raudsepp.
* Get rid of multiple applications of transformExpr() to the same tree.Tom Lane2015-02-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | transformExpr() has for many years had provisions to do nothing when applied to an already-transformed expression tree. However, this was always ugly and of dubious reliability, so we'd be much better off without it. The primary historical reason for it was that gram.y sometimes returned multiple links to the same subexpression, which is no longer true as of my BETWEEN fixes. We'd also grown some lazy hacks in CREATE TABLE LIKE (failing to distinguish between raw and already-transformed index specifications) and one or two other places. This patch removes the need for and support for re-transforming already transformed expressions. The index case is dealt with by adding a flag to struct IndexStmt to indicate that it's already been transformed; which has some benefit anyway in that tablecmds.c can now Assert that transformation has happened rather than just assuming. The other main reason was some rather sloppy code for array type coercion, which can be fixed (and its performance improved too) by refactoring. I did leave transformJoinUsingClause() still constructing expressions containing untransformed operator nodes being applied to Vars, so that transformExpr() still has to allow Var inputs. But that's a much narrower, and safer, special case than before, since Vars will never appear in a raw parse tree, and they don't have any substructure to worry about. In passing fix some oversights in the patch that added CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS (missing processing of IndexStmt.if_not_exists). These appear relatively harmless, but still sloppy coding practice.
* Fix typo in comment.Heikki Linnakangas2015-02-03
| | | | Amit Langote