aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/jit/llvm
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
...
* Pre-beta mechanical code beautification.Tom Lane2022-05-12
| | | | | Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files. I manually fixed a couple of comments that pgindent uglified.
* Remove extraneous blank lines before block-closing bracesAlvaro Herrera2022-04-13
| | | | | | | | | These are useless and distracting. We wouldn't have written the code with them to begin with, so there's no reason to keep them. Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220411020336.GB26620@telsasoft.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/attachment/133167/0016-Extraneous-blank-lines.patch
* SQL/JSON query functionsAndrew Dunstan2022-03-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This introduces the SQL/JSON functions for querying JSON data using jsonpath expressions. The functions are: JSON_EXISTS() JSON_QUERY() JSON_VALUE() All of these functions only operate on jsonb. The workaround for now is to cast the argument to jsonb. JSON_EXISTS() tests if the jsonpath expression applied to the jsonb value yields any values. JSON_VALUE() must return a single value, and an error occurs if it tries to return multiple values. JSON_QUERY() must return a json object or array, and there are various WRAPPER options for handling scalar or multi-value results. Both these functions have options for handling EMPTY and ERROR conditions. Nikita Glukhov Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu, Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
* IS JSON predicateAndrew Dunstan2022-03-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch intrdocuces the SQL standard IS JSON predicate. It operates on text and bytea values representing JSON as well as on the json and jsonb types. Each test has an IS and IS NOT variant. The tests are: IS JSON [VALUE] IS JSON ARRAY IS JSON OBJECT IS JSON SCALAR IS JSON WITH | WITHOUT UNIQUE KEYS These are mostly self-explanatory, but note that IS JSON WITHOUT UNIQUE KEYS is true whenever IS JSON is true, and IS JSON WITH UNIQUE KEYS is true whenever IS JSON is true except it IS JSON OBJECT is true and there are duplicate keys (which is never the case when applied to jsonb values). Nikita Glukhov Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu, Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
* SQL/JSON constructorsAndrew Dunstan2022-03-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch introduces the SQL/JSON standard constructors for JSON: JSON() JSON_ARRAY() JSON_ARRAYAGG() JSON_OBJECT() JSON_OBJECTAGG() For the most part these functions provide facilities that mimic existing json/jsonb functions. However, they also offer some useful additional functionality. In addition to text input, the JSON() function accepts bytea input, which it will decode and constuct a json value from. The other functions provide useful options for handling duplicate keys and null values. This series of patches will be followed by a consolidated documentation patch. Nikita Glukhov Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu, Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
* Silence LLVM 14 API deprecation warnings.Thomas Munro2022-03-16
| | | | | | | | | | | We are going to need to handle the upcoming opaque pointer API changes[1], possibly in time for LLVM 15, but in the meantime let's silence the warnings produced by LLVM 14. [1] https://llvm.org/docs/OpaquePointers.html Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2Bp%3DfaBQR2PSAqWoWa%2B_tJdKPT0wjZPQe7XcDEttUCgdQ%40mail.gmail.com
* Track LLVM 15 changes.Thomas Munro2022-02-14
| | | | | This isn't an API change, it's just a missing #include that we got away with before. Per buildfarm animal seawasp.
* Track LLVM 14 API changes, up to 2022-01-30.Thomas Munro2022-02-04
| | | | | | | | | | | Tested with LLVM 11, LLVM 13 and LLVM's main branch at commit 8d8fce87bbd5. There are still some deprecation warnings that will need to be sorted out, but this may be enough to turn "seawasp" green again. Like commit e6a76002, done on master only for now. Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2B3Ac3He9_SpJcxeiiVknbcES1tbZEkH9sRBdJFGj8K5Q%40mail.gmail.com
* Update copyright for 2022Bruce Momjian2022-01-07
| | | | Backpatch-through: 10
* Fix some typos with {a,an}Michael Paquier2021-12-09
| | | | | | | | One of the changes impacts the documentation, so backpatch. Author: Peter Smith Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+Pu6+c+r3mY24VT7u+H+E_s6vMr5OdRiZ8NT3EOa-E5Lmw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 14
* Avoid some other O(N^2) hazards in list manipulation.Tom Lane2021-11-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | In the same spirit as 6301c3ada, fix some more places where we were using list_delete_first() in a loop and thereby risking O(N^2) behavior. It's not clear that the lists manipulated in these spots can get long enough to be really problematic ... but it's not clear that they can't, either, and the fixes are simple enough. As before, back-patch to v13. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CD2F0E7F-9822-45EC-A411-AE56F14DEA9F@amazon.com
* Track LLVM 14 API changes.Thomas Munro2021-09-27
| | | | | | | | | Only done on the master branch for now to fix build farm animal seawasp (which tests bleeeding edge PostgreSQL with bleeding edge LLVM). We can back-patch a consolidated fix closer to LLVM 14's release, once its API has stopped moving around. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGL%3Dyg6qqgg6W6SAuvRQejditeoDNy-X3b9H_6Fnw8j5Wg%40mail.gmail.com
* jit: Do not try to shut down LLVM state in case of LLVM triggered errors.Andres Freund2021-09-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If an allocation failed within LLVM it is not safe to call back into LLVM as LLVM is not generally safe against exceptions / stack-unwinding. Thus errors while in LLVM code are promoted to FATAL. However llvm_shutdown() did call back into LLVM even in such cases, while llvm_release_context() was careful not to do so. We cannot generally skip shutting down LLVM, as that can break profiling. But it's OK to do so if there was an error from within LLVM. Reported-By: Jelte Fennema <Jelte.Fennema@microsoft.com> Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AM5PR83MB0178C52CCA0A8DEA0207DC14F7FF9@AM5PR83MB0178.EURPRD83.prod.outlook.com Backpatch: 11-, where jit was introduced
* Clarify some comments making use of leetspeak term "up2date"Michael Paquier2021-07-28
| | | | | | | | Most of these are new, as of a8fd13c, and "up-to-date" is much easier to parse for the average reader. Author: Peter Smith Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PtHbHvgOjs_R9LyDF21j-Wn8SxoTtWMQNP2ifXN6t2cSg@mail.gmail.com
* jit: Don't inline functions that access thread-locals.Thomas Munro2021-07-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | Code inlined by LLVM can crash or fail with "Relocation type not implemented yet!" if it tries to access thread local variables. Don't inline such code. Back-patch to 11, where LLVM arrived. Bug #16696. Author: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16696-29d944a33801fbfe@postgresql.org
* Prepare for forthcoming LLVM 13 API change.Thomas Munro2021-06-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | LLVM 13 (due out in September) has changed the semantics of LLVMOrcAbsoluteSymbols(), so we need to bump some reference counts to avoid a double-free that causes crashes and bad query results. A proactive change seems necessary to avoid having a window of time where our respective latest releases would interact badly. It's possible that the situation could change before then, though. Thanks to Fabien Coelho for monitoring bleeding edge LLVM and Andres Freund for tracking down the change. Back-patch to 11, where the JIT code arrived. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGLEy8mgtN7BNp0ooFAjUedDTJj5dME7NxLU-m91b85siA%40mail.gmail.com
* Initial pgindent and pgperltidy run for v14.Tom Lane2021-05-12
| | | | | | | | Also "make reformat-dat-files". The only change worthy of note is that pgindent messed up the formatting of launcher.c's struct LogicalRepWorkerId, which led me to notice that that struct wasn't used at all anymore, so I just took it out.
* jit: Fix warning reported by gcc-11 caused by dubious function signature.Andres Freund2021-05-05
| | | | | | Reported-By: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/833107370.1313189.1619647621213@webmailclassic.xs4all.nl Backpatch: 13, where b059d2f45685 introduced the issue.
* Speedup ScalarArrayOpExpr evaluationDavid Rowley2021-04-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ScalarArrayOpExprs with "useOr=true" and a set of Consts on the righthand side have traditionally been evaluated by using a linear search over the array. When these arrays contain large numbers of elements then this linear search could become a significant part of execution time. Here we add a new method of evaluating ScalarArrayOpExpr expressions to allow them to be evaluated by first building a hash table containing each element, then on subsequent evaluations, we just probe that hash table to determine if there is a match. The planner is in charge of determining when this optimization is possible and it enables it by setting hashfuncid in the ScalarArrayOpExpr. The executor will only perform the hash table evaluation when the hashfuncid is set. This means that not all cases are optimized. For example CHECK constraints containing an IN clause won't go through the planner, so won't get the hashfuncid set. We could maybe do something about that at some later date. The reason we're not doing it now is from fear that we may slow down cases where the expression is evaluated only once. Those cases can be common, for example, a single row INSERT to a table with a CHECK constraint containing an IN clause. In the planner, we enable this when there are suitable hash functions for the ScalarArrayOpExpr's operator and only when there is at least MIN_ARRAY_SIZE_FOR_HASHED_SAOP elements in the array. The threshold is currently set to 9. Author: James Coleman, David Rowley Reviewed-by: David Rowley, Tomas Vondra, Heikki Linnakangas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAaqYe8x62+=wn0zvNKCj55tPpg-JBHzhZFFc6ANovdqFw7-dA@mail.gmail.com
* Use errmsg_internal for debug messagesPeter Eisentraut2021-02-17
| | | | | | An inconsistent set of debug-level messages was not using errmsg_internal(), thus uselessly exposing the messages to translation work. Fix those.
* Update copyright for 2021Bruce Momjian2021-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: 9.5
* Support subscripting of arbitrary types, not only arrays.Tom Lane2020-12-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch generalizes the subscripting infrastructure so that any data type can be subscripted, if it provides a handler function to define what that means. Traditional variable-length (varlena) arrays all use array_subscript_handler(), while the existing fixed-length types that support subscripting use raw_array_subscript_handler(). It's expected that other types that want to use subscripting notation will define their own handlers. (This patch provides no such new features, though; it only lays the foundation for them.) To do this, move the parser's semantic processing of subscripts (including coercion to whatever data type is required) into a method callback supplied by the handler. On the execution side, replace the ExecEvalSubscriptingRef* layer of functions with direct calls to callback-supplied execution routines. (Thus, essentially no new run-time overhead should be caused by this patch. Indeed, there is room to remove some overhead by supplying specialized execution routines. This patch does a little bit in that line, but more could be done.) Additional work is required here and there to remove formerly hard-wired assumptions about the result type, collation, etc of a SubscriptingRef expression node; and to remove assumptions that the subscript values must be integers. One useful side-effect of this is that we now have a less squishy mechanism for identifying whether a data type is a "true" array: instead of wiring in weird rules about typlen, we can look to see if pg_type.typsubscript == F_ARRAY_SUBSCRIPT_HANDLER. For this to be bulletproof, we have to forbid user-defined types from using that handler directly; but there seems no good reason for them to do so. This patch also removes assumptions that the number of subscripts is limited to MAXDIM (6), or indeed has any hard-wired limit. That limit still applies to types handled by array_subscript_handler or raw_array_subscript_handler, but to discourage other dependencies on this constant, I've moved it from c.h to utils/array.h. Dmitry Dolgov, reviewed at various times by Tom Lane, Arthur Zakirov, Peter Eisentraut, Pavel Stehule Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+q6zcVDuGBv=M0FqBYX8DPebS3F_0KQ6OVFobGJPM507_SZ_w@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+q6zcVovR+XY4mfk-7oNk-rF91gH0PebnNfuUjuuDsyHjOcVA@mail.gmail.com
* jit: Reference function pointer types via llvmjit_types.c.Andres Freund2020-12-08
| | | | | | | | | | It is error prone (see 5da871bfa1b) and verbose to manually create function types. Add a helper that can reference a function pointer type via llvmjit_types.c and and convert existing instances of manual creation. Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Reviewed-By: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201207212142.wz5tnbk2jsaqzogb@alap3.anarazel.de
* jit: Correct parameter type for generated expression evaluation functions.Andres Freund2020-12-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | clang only uses the 'i1' type for scalar booleans, not for pointers to booleans (as the pointer might be pointing into a larger memory allocation). Therefore a pointer-to-bool needs to the "storage" boolean. There's no known case of wrong code generation due to this, but it seems quite possible that it could cause problems (see e.g. 72559438f92). Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201207212142.wz5tnbk2jsaqzogb@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 11-, where jit support was added
* Move per-agg and per-trans duplicate finding to the planner.Heikki Linnakangas2020-11-24
| | | | | | | | | | This has the advantage that the cost estimates for aggregates can count the number of calls to transition and final functions correctly. Bump catalog version, because views can contain Aggrefs. Reviewed-by: Andres Freund Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b2e3536b-1dbc-8303-c97e-89cb0b4a9a48%40iki.fi
* jit: Add support for LLVM 12.Andres Freund2020-11-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | LLVM 12, to be released in a few months, made some breaking changes to the Orc JIT interface. OrcV2 eventually will make it easier to support features like concurrent JIT compilation, but this commit only allows to compile against LLVM 12. This commit is a bit bigger than desirable. That partially is because the V2 interface is more granular than V1 interface, but also because I chose to make some minor changes to < LLVM 12 code to keep the code somewhat readable. The LLVM 12 support will need to be backpatched. I plan to do so after the patch stewed on the buildfarm for a few days. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201016011244.pmyvr3ee2gbzplq4@alap3.anarazel.de
* llvmjit: Work around bug in LLVM 3.9 causing crashes after 72559438f92.Andres Freund2020-10-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Unfortunately in LLVM 3.9 LLVMGetAttributeCountAtIndex(func, index) crashes when called with an index that has 0 attributes. Since there's no way to work around this in the C API, add a small C++ wrapper doing so. The only reason this didn't fail before 72559438f92 is that there always are function attributes... Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201016001254.w2nfj7gd74jmb5in@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 11-, like 72559438f92
* llvmjit: Also copy parameter / return value attributes from template functions.Andres Freund2020-10-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously we only copied the function attributes. That caused problems at least on s390x: Because we didn't copy the 'zeroext' attribute for ExecAggTransReparent()'s *IsNull parameters, expressions invoking it didn't ensure that the upper bytes of the registers were zeroed. In the - relatively rare - cases where not, ExecAggTransReparent() wrongly ended up in the newValueIsNull branch due to the register not being zero. Subsequently causing a crash. It's quite possible that this would cause problems on other platforms, and in other places than just ExecAggTransReparent() on s390x. Thanks to Christoph (and the Debian project) for providing me with access to a s390x machine, allowing me to debug this. Reported-By: Christoph Berg Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201015083246.kie5726xerdt3ael@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 11-, where JIT was added
* Move resolution of AlternativeSubPlan choices to the planner.Tom Lane2020-09-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When commit bd3daddaf introduced AlternativeSubPlans, I had some ambitions towards allowing the choice of subplan to change during execution. That has not happened, or even been thought about, in the ensuing twelve years; so it seems like a failed experiment. So let's rip that out and resolve the choice of subplan at the end of planning (in setrefs.c) rather than during executor startup. This has a number of positive benefits: * Removal of a few hundred lines of executor code, since AlternativeSubPlans need no longer be supported there. * Removal of executor-startup overhead (particularly, initialization of subplans that won't be used). * Removal of incidental costs of having a larger plan tree, such as tree-scanning and copying costs in the plancache; not to mention setrefs.c's own costs of processing the discarded subplans. * EXPLAIN no longer has to print a weird (and undocumented) representation of an AlternativeSubPlan choice; it sees only the subplan actually used. This should mean less confusion for users. * Since setrefs.c knows which subexpression of a plan node it's working on at any instant, it's possible to adjust the estimated number of executions of the subplan based on that. For example, we should usually estimate more executions of a qual expression than a targetlist expression. The implementation used here is pretty simplistic, because we don't want to expend a lot of cycles on the issue; but it's better than ignoring the point entirely, as the executor had to. That last point might possibly result in shifting the choice between hashed and non-hashed EXISTS subplans in a few cases, but in general this patch isn't meant to change planner choices. Since we're doing the resolution so late, it's really impossible to change any plan choices outside the AlternativeSubPlan itself. Patch by me; thanks to David Rowley for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1992952.1592785225@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Register llvm_shutdown using on_proc_exit, not before_shmem_exit.Robert Haas2020-08-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This seems more correct, because other before_shmem_exit calls may expect the infrastructure that is needed to run queries and access the database to be working, and also because this cleanup has nothing to do with shared memory. There are no known user-visible consequences to this, though, apart from what was previous fixed by commit 303640199d0436c5e7acdf50b837a027b5726594 and back-patched as commit bcbc27251d35336a6442761f59638138a772b839 and commit f7013683d9bb663a6a917421b1374306a32f165b, so for now, no back-patch. Bharath Rupireddy Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACWk7j4F2v2fxxYfrroOF=AdFNPr1WsV+AGtHAFQOqm_pw@mail.gmail.com
* pgindent run prior to branching v13.Tom Lane2020-06-07
| | | | | pgperltidy and reformat-dat-files too, though those didn't find anything to change.
* Spelling adjustmentsPeter Eisentraut2020-06-07
|
* llvmjit: Fix building against LLVM 11 by removing unnecessary include.Andres Freund2020-05-28
| | | | | | | | | LLVM has removed this header, in the branch that will become llvm 11. But as it turns out we didn't actually need it, so just remove it. Author: Jesse Zhang <sbjesse@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGf+fX7bvtP0YXMu7pOsu_NwhxW6dArTkxb=jt7M2-UJkyJ_3g@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 11, where JIT support using llvm was introduced.
* Initial pgindent and pgperltidy run for v13.Tom Lane2020-05-14
| | | | | | | | | | | Includes some manual cleanup of places that pgindent messed up, most of which weren't per project style anyway. Notably, it seems some people didn't absorb the style rules of commit c9d297751, because there were a bunch of new occurrences of function calls with a newline just after the left paren, all with faulty expectations about how the rest of the call would get indented.
* Extend ExecBuildAggTrans() to support a NULL pointer check.Jeff Davis2020-03-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Optionally push a step to check for a NULL pointer to the pergroup state. This will be important for disk-based hash aggregation in combination with grouping sets. When memory limits are reached, a given tuple may find its per-group state for some grouping sets but not others. For the former, it advances the per-group state as normal; for the latter, it skips evaluation and the calling code will have to spill the tuple and reprocess it in a later batch. Add the NULL check as a separate expression step because in some common cases it's not needed. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200221202212.ssb2qpmdgrnx52sj%40alap3.anarazel.de
* Introduce macros for typalign and typstorage constants.Tom Lane2020-03-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Our usual practice for "poor man's enum" catalog columns is to define macros for the possible values and use those, not literal constants, in C code. But for some reason lost in the mists of time, this was never done for typalign/attalign or typstorage/attstorage. It's never too late to make it better though, so let's do that. The reason I got interested in this right now is the need to duplicate some uses of the TYPSTORAGE constants in an upcoming ALTER TYPE patch. But in general, this sort of change aids greppability and readability, so it's a good idea even without any specific motivation. I may have missed a few places that could be converted, and it's even more likely that pending patches will re-introduce some hard-coded references. But that's not fatal --- there's no expectation that we'd actually change any of these values. We can clean up stragglers over time. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16457.1583189537@sss.pgh.pa.us
* expression eval: Reduce number of steps for agg transition invocations.Andres Freund2020-02-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Do so by combining the various steps that are part of aggregate transition function invocation into one larger step. As some of the current steps are only necessary for some aggregates, have one variant of the aggregate transition step for each possible combination. To avoid further manual copies of code in the different transition step implementations, move most of the code into helper functions marked as "always inline". The benefit of this change is an increase in performance when aggregating lots of rows. This comes in part due to the reduced number of indirect jumps due to the reduced number of steps, and in part by reducing redundant setup code across steps. This mainly benefits interpreted execution, but the code generated by JIT is also improved a bit. As a nice side-effect it also ends up making the code a bit simpler. A small additional optimization is removing the need to set aggstate->curaggcontext before calling ExecAggInitGroup, choosing to instead passign curaggcontext as an argument. It was, in contrast to other aggregate related functions, only needed to fetch a memory context to copy the transition value into. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191023163849.sosqbfs5yenocez3@alap3.anarazel.de https://postgr.es/m/5c371df7cee903e8cd4c685f90c6c72086d3a2dc.camel@j-davis.com
* jit: Reference expression step functions via llvmjit_types.Andres Freund2020-02-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The main benefit of doing so is that this allows llvm to ensure that types match - previously that'd only be detected by a crash within the called function. There were a number of cases where we passed a superfluous parameter... To avoid needing to add all the functions to llvmjit.{c,h}, instead get them from the llvm module for llvmjit_types.c. Also use that for the functions from llvmjit_types already in llvmjit.h. Author: Soumyadeep Chakraborty and Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADwEdooww3wZv-sXSfatzFRwMuwa186LyTwkBfwEW6NjtooBPA@mail.gmail.com
* jit: Remove redundancies in expression evaluation code generation.Andres Freund2020-02-06
| | | | | | | | | | This merges the code emission for a number of opcodes by handling the behavioural difference more locally. This reduces code, and also improves the generated code a bit in some cases, by removing redundant constants. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191023163849.sosqbfs5yenocez3@alap3.anarazel.de
* jit: Reference functions by name in IOCOERCE steps.Andres Freund2020-02-06
| | | | | | | | Previously we used constant function pointer addresses, which prevents inlining and other related optimizations. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191023163849.sosqbfs5yenocez3@alap3.anarazel.de
* expression eval: Don't redundantly keep track of AggState.Andres Freund2020-02-06
| | | | | | | | | | It's already tracked via ExprState->parent, so we don't need to also include it in ExprEvalStep. When that code originally was written ExprState->parent didn't exist, but it since has been introduced in 6719b238e8f. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191023163849.sosqbfs5yenocez3@alap3.anarazel.de
* expression eval, jit: Minor code cleanups.Andres Freund2020-02-06
| | | | | | | | | | This mostly consists of using C99 style for loops, moving variables into narrower scopes, and a smattering of other minor improvements. Done separately to make it easier to review patches with actual functional changes. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191023163849.sosqbfs5yenocez3@alap3.anarazel.de
* Update copyrights for 2020Bruce Momjian2020-01-01
| | | | Backpatch-through: update all files in master, backpatch legal files through 9.4
* Refactor attribute mappings used in logical tuple conversionMichael Paquier2019-12-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tuple conversion support in tupconvert.c is able to convert rowtypes between two relations, inner and outer, which are logically equivalent but have a different ordering or even dropped columns (used mainly for inheritance tree and partitions). This makes use of attribute mappings, which are simple arrays made of AttrNumber elements with a length matching the number of attributes of the outer relation. The length of the attribute mapping has been treated as completely independent of the mapping itself until now, making it easy to pass down an incorrect mapping length. This commit refactors the code related to attribute mappings and moves it into an independent facility called attmap.c, extracted from tupconvert.c. This merges the attribute mapping with its length, avoiding to try to guess what is the length of a mapping to use as this is computed once, when the map is built. This will avoid mistakes like what has been fixed in dc816e58, which has used an incorrect mapping length by matching it with the number of attributes of an inner relation (a child partition) instead of an outer relation (a partitioned table). Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Amit Langote Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191121042556.GD153437@paquier.xyz
* Remove useless "return;" linesAlvaro Herrera2019-11-28
| | | | Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191128144653.GA27883@alvherre.pgsql
* Make the order of the header file includes consistent in backend modules.Amit Kapila2019-11-12
| | | | | | | | | | | Similar to commits 7e735035f2 and dddf4cdc33, this commit makes the order of header file inclusion consistent for backend modules. In the passing, removed a couple of duplicate inclusions. Author: Vignesh C Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh and Amit Kapila Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm2Sznv8RR6Ex-iJO6xAdsxgWhCoETkaYX=+9DW3q0QCfA@mail.gmail.com
* Split all OBJS style lines in makefiles into one-line-per-entry style.Andres Freund2019-11-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When maintaining or merging patches, one of the most common sources for conflicts are the list of objects in makefiles. Especially when the split across lines has been changed on both sides, which is somewhat common due to attempting to stay below 80 columns, those conflicts are unnecessarily laborious to resolve. By splitting, and alphabetically sorting, OBJS style lines into one object per line, conflicts should be less frequent, and easier to resolve when they still occur. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191029200901.vww4idgcxv74cwes@alap3.anarazel.de
* Don't generate EEOP_*_FETCHSOME operations for slots know to be virtual.Andres Freund2019-09-30
| | | | | | | | | | | | That avoids unnecessary work during both interpreted execution, and JIT compiled expression evaluation. Both benefit from fewer expression steps needing be processed, and for interpreted execution there now is a fastpath dedicated to just fetching a value from a virtual slot. That's e.g. beneficial for hashjoins over nodes that perform projections, as the hashed columns are currently fetched individually. Author: Soumyadeep Chakraborty, Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAE-ML+9OKSN71+mHtfMD-L24oDp8dGTfaVjDU6U+j+FNAW5kRQ@mail.gmail.com
* Don't rely on llvm::make_unique.Thomas Munro2019-08-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | Bleeding-edge LLVM has stopped supplying replacements for various C++14 library features, for people on older C++ versions. Since we're not ready to require C++14 yet, just use plain old new instead of make_unique. As revealed by buildfarm animal seawasp. Back-patch to 11. Reviewed-by: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJWG7unNqmkxg7nC5o3o-0p2XP6co4r%3D9epqYMm8UY4Mw%40mail.gmail.com
* Avoid macro clash with LLVM 9.Thomas Munro2019-07-29
| | | | | | | | | | Early previews of LLVM 9 reveal that our Min() macro causes compiler errors in LLVM headers reached by the #include directives in llvmjit_inline.cpp. Let's just undefine it. Per buildfarm animal seawasp. Back-patch to 11. Reviewed-by: Fabien Coelho, Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190606173216.GA6306%40alvherre.pgsql
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-05-31 10:49:58 +0000