| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
| |
Backpatch-through: 13
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new compact_attrs array stores a few select fields from
FormData_pg_attribute in a more compact way, using only 16 bytes per
column instead of the 104 bytes that FormData_pg_attribute uses. Using
CompactAttribute allows performance-critical operations such as tuple
deformation to be performed without looking at the FormData_pg_attribute
element in TupleDesc which means fewer cacheline accesses.
For some workloads, tuple deformation can be the most CPU intensive part
of processing the query. Some testing with 16 columns on a table
where the first column is variable length showed around a 10% increase in
transactions per second for an OLAP type query performing aggregation on
the 16th column. However, in certain cases, the increases were much
higher, up to ~25% on one AMD Zen4 machine.
This also makes pg_attribute.attcacheoff redundant. A follow-on commit
will remove it, thus shrinking the FormData_pg_attribute struct by 4
bytes.
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Victor Yegorov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrBztXP3yx=NKNmo3xwFAFhEdyPnvrDg3=M0RhDs+4vYw@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit d28dff3f6cd6a7562fb2c211ac0fb74a33ffd032.
Quite a large number of buildfarm members didn't like this commit and
it's not yet clear why. Reverting this before too many animals turn
red.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvr9i6T5=iAwQCxFDgMsthr_obVxgwBaEJkC8KUH6yM3Hw@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new compact_attrs array stores a few select fields from
FormData_pg_attribute in a more compact way, using only 16 bytes per
column instead of the 104 bytes that FormData_pg_attribute uses. Using
CompactAttribute allows performance-critical operations such as tuple
deformation to be performed without looking at the FormData_pg_attribute
element in TupleDesc which means fewer cacheline accesses. With this
change, NAMEDATALEN could be increased with a much smaller negative impact
on performance.
For some workloads, tuple deformation can be the most CPU intensive part
of processing the query. Some testing with 16 columns on a table
where the first column is variable length showed around a 10% increase in
transactions per second for an OLAP type query performing aggregation on
the 16th column. However, in certain cases, the increases were much
higher, up to ~25% on one AMD Zen4 machine.
This also makes pg_attribute.attcacheoff redundant. A follow-on commit
will remove it, thus shrinking the FormData_pg_attribute struct by 4
bytes.
Author: David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrBztXP3yx=NKNmo3xwFAFhEdyPnvrDg3=M0RhDs+4vYw@mail.gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Victor Yegorov
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Many of them just seem to have been copied around for no real reason.
Their presence causes (small) risks of hiding actual type mismatches
or silently discarding qualifiers
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/461ea37c-8b58-43b4-9736-52884e862820@eisentraut.org
|
| |
|
|
| |
for commit 79b575d3bc0
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
REPLICA IDENTITY USING INDEX did not accept a GiST index. This should
be allowed when used as a temporal primary key.
Author: Paul Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/04579cbf-b134-45e1-8f2d-8c54c849c1ee@illuminatedcomputing.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allowing foreign keys where the referenced and the referencing columns
have collations with different notions of equality is problematic.
This can only happen when using nondeterministic collations, for
example, if the referencing column is case-insensitive and the
referenced column is not, or vice versa. It does not happen if both
collations are deterministic.
To show one example:
CREATE COLLATION case_insensitive (provider = icu, deterministic = false, locale = 'und-u-ks-level2');
CREATE TABLE pktable (x text COLLATE "C" PRIMARY KEY);
CREATE TABLE fktable (x text COLLATE case_insensitive REFERENCES pktable ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE CASCADE);
INSERT INTO pktable VALUES ('A'), ('a');
INSERT INTO fktable VALUES ('A');
BEGIN; DELETE FROM pktable WHERE x = 'a'; TABLE fktable; ROLLBACK;
BEGIN; DELETE FROM pktable WHERE x = 'A'; TABLE fktable; ROLLBACK;
Both of these DELETE statements delete the one row from fktable. So
this means that one row from fktable references two rows in pktable,
which should not happen. (That's why a primary key or unique
constraint is required on pktable.)
When nondeterministic collations were implemented, the SQL standard
available to yours truly said that referential integrity checks should
be performed with the collation of the referenced column, and so
that's how we implemented it. But this turned out to be a mistake in
the SQL standard, for the same reasons as above, that was later
(SQL:2016) fixed to require both collations to be the same. So that's
what we are aiming for here.
We don't have to be quite so strict. We can allow different
collations if they are both deterministic. This is also good for
backward compatibility.
So the new rule is that the collations either have to be the same or
both deterministic. Or in other words, if one of them is
nondeterministic, then both have to be the same.
Users upgrading from before that have affected setups will need to
make changes to their schemas (i.e., change one or both collations in
affected foreign-key relationships) before the upgrade will succeed.
Some of the nice test cases for the previous situation in
collate.icu.utf8.sql are now obsolete. They are changed to just check
the error checking of the new rule. Note that collate.sql already
contained a test for foreign keys with different deterministic
collations.
A bunch of code in ri_triggers.c that added a COLLATE clause to
enforce the referenced column's collation can be removed, because both
columns now have to have the same notion of equality, so it doesn't
matter which one to use.
Reported-by: Paul Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/78d824e0-b21e-480d-a252-e4b84bc2c24b@illuminatedcomputing.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We now create contype='n' pg_constraint rows for not-null constraints on
user tables. Only one such constraint is allowed for a column.
We propagate these constraints to other tables during operations such as
adding inheritance relationships, creating and attaching partitions and
creating tables LIKE other tables. These related constraints mostly
follow the well-known rules of conislocal and coninhcount that we have
for CHECK constraints, with some adaptations: for example, as opposed to
CHECK constraints, we don't match not-null ones by name when descending
a hierarchy to alter or remove it, instead matching by the name of the
column that they apply to. This means we don't require the constraint
names to be identical across a hierarchy.
The inheritance status of these constraints can be controlled: now we
can be sure that if a parent table has one, then all children will have
it as well. They can optionally be marked NO INHERIT, and then children
are free not to have one. (There's currently no support for altering a
NO INHERIT constraint into inheriting down the hierarchy, but that's a
desirable future feature.)
This also opens the door for having these constraints be marked NOT
VALID, as well as allowing UNIQUE+NOT NULL to be used for functional
dependency determination, as envisioned by commit e49ae8d3bc58. It's
likely possible to allow DEFERRABLE constraints as followup work, as
well.
psql shows these constraints in \d+, though we may want to reconsider if
this turns out to be too noisy. Earlier versions of this patch hid
constraints that were on the same columns of the primary key, but I'm
not sure that that's very useful. If clutter is a problem, we might be
better off inventing a new \d++ command and not showing the constraints
in \d+.
For now, we omit these constraints on system catalog columns, because
they're unlikely to achieve anything.
The main difference to the previous attempt at this (b0e96f311985) is
that we now require that such a constraint always exists when a primary
key is in the column; we didn't require this previously which had a
number of unpalatable consequences. With this requirement, the code is
easier to reason about. For example:
- We no longer have "throwaway constraints" during pg_dump. We needed
those for the case where a table had a PK without a not-null
underneath, to prevent a slow scan of the data during restore of the
PK creation, which was particularly problematic for pg_upgrade.
- We no longer have to cope with attnotnull being set spuriously in
case a primary key is dropped indirectly (e.g., via DROP COLUMN).
Some bits of code in this patch were authored by Jian He.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Author: Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>
Reviewed-by: 何建 (jian he) <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: 王刚 (Tender Wang) <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202408310358.sdhumtyuy2ht@alvherre.pgsql
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Clarify the message about type mismatch in foreign key definition to
indicate which column the referencing and which is the referenced one.
Reported-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CACJufxEL82ao-aXOa=d_-Xip0bix-qdSyNc9fcWxOdkEZFko8w@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* In DetachPartitionFinalize() we were applying a tuple conversion map
to tuples that didn't need one, which can lead to erratic behavior if
a partitioned table has a partition with a different column order, as
reported by Alexander Lakhin. This was introduced by 53af9491a043.
Don't do that. Also, modify a recently added test case to exercise
this.
* The same function as well as CloneFkReferenced() were acquiring
AccessShareLock on a partition, only to have CreateTrigger() later
acquire ShareRowExclusiveLock on it. This can lead to deadlock by
lock escalation, unnecessarily. Avoid that by acquiring the stronger
lock to begin with. This probably dates back to branch 12, but I have
never seen a report of this being a problem in the field.
* Innocuous but wasteful: also introduced by 53af9491a043, we were
reading a pg_constraint tuple from syscache that we don't need, as
reported by Tender Wang. Don't.
Backpatch to 15.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/461e9c26-2076-8224-e119-84998b6a784e@gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
... to fix bugs when the referenced table is partitioned.
The catalog representation we chose for foreign keys connecting
partitioned tables (in commit f56f8f8da6af) is inconvenient, in the
sense that a standalone table has a different way to represent the
constraint when referencing a partitioned table, than when the same
table becomes a partition (and vice versa). Because of this, we need to
create additional catalog rows on detach (pg_constraint and pg_trigger),
and remove them on attach. We were doing some of those things, but not
all of them, leading to missing catalog rows in certain cases.
The worst problem seems to be that we are missing action triggers after
detaching a partition, which means that you could update/delete rows
from the referenced partitioned table that still had referencing rows on
that table, the server failing to throw the required errors.
!!!
Note that this means existing databases with FKs that reference
partitioned tables might have rows that break relational integrity, on
tables that were once partitions on the referencing side of the FK.
Another possible problem is that trying to reattach a table
that had been detached would fail indicating that internal triggers
cannot be found, which from the user's point of view is nonsensical.
In branches 15 and above, we fix this by creating a new helper function
addFkConstraint() which is in charge of creating a standalone
pg_constraint row, and repurposing addFkRecurseReferencing() and
addFkRecurseReferenced() so that they're only the recursive routine for
each side of the FK, and they call addFkConstraint() to create
pg_constraint at each partitioning level and add the necessary triggers.
These new routines can be used during partition creation, partition
attach and detach, and foreign key creation. This reduces redundant
code and simplifies the flow.
In branches 14 and 13, we have a much simpler fix that consists on
simply removing the constraint on detach. The reason is that those
branches are missing commit f4566345cf40, which reworked the way this
works in a way that we didn't consider back-patchable at the time.
We opted to leave branch 12 alone, because it's different from branch 13
enough that the fix doesn't apply; and because it is going in EOL mode
very soon, patching it now might be worse since there's no way to undo
the damage if it goes wrong.
Existing databases might need to be repaired.
In the future we might want to rethink the catalog representation to
avoid this problem, but for now the code seems to do what's required to
make the constraints operate correctly.
Co-authored-by: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Co-authored-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reported-by: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>
Reported-by: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Reported-by: Thomas Baehler (SBB CFF FFS) <thomas.baehler2@sbb.ch>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230420144344.40744130@karst
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230705233028.2f554f73@karst
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/GVAP278MB02787E7134FD691861635A8BC9032@GVAP278MB0278.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18541-628a61bc267cd2d3@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 90189eefc1e1 narrowed pg_attribute.attinhcount and
pg_constraint.coninhcount from 32 to 16 bits, but kept other related
structs with 32-bit wide fields: ColumnDef and CookedConstraint contain
an int 'inhcount' field which is itself checked for overflow on
increments, but there's no check that the values aren't above INT16_MAX
before assigning to the catalog columns. This means that a creative
user can get a inconsistent table definition and override some
protections.
Fix it by changing those other structs to also use int16.
Also, modernize style by using pg_add_s16_overflow for overflow testing
instead of checking for negative values.
We also have Constraint.inhcount, which is here removed completely.
This was added by commit b0e96f311985 and not removed by its revert at
6f8bb7c1e961. It is not needed by the upcoming not-null constraints
patch.
This is mostly academic, so we agreed not to backpatch to avoid ABI
problems.
Bump catversion because of the changes to parse nodes.
Co-authored-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Co-authored-by: 何建 (jian he) <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202410081611.up4iyofb5ie7@alvherre.pgsql
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In commit babb3993dbe9, I accidentally introduced a Unicode
apostrophe (U+2019). This commit replaces it with the ASCII
apostrophe (U+0027) for consistency.
Reported-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfduNWMBjkJFtqXJremk6b6YQYO2s3_VEpnj-T_CaUNUYYQ@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit addresses two issues related to the manipulation of the
partition constraint expression list in ATExecAttachPartition().
First, the current use of list_concat() to combine the partition's
constraint (retrieved via get_qual_from_partbound()) with the parent
table’s partition constraint can lead to memory safety issues. After
calling list_concat(), the original constraint (partBoundConstraint)
might no longer be safe to access, as list_concat() may free or modify
it.
Second, there's a logical error in constructing the constraint for
validating against the default partition. The current approach
incorrectly includes a negated version of the parent table's partition
constraint, which is redundant, as it always evaluates to false for
rows in the default partition.
To resolve these issues, list_concat() is replaced with
list_concat_copy(), ensuring that partBoundConstraint remains unchanged
and can be safely reused when constructing the validation constraint
for the default partition.
This fix is not applied to back-branches, as there is no live bug and
the issue has not caused any reported problems in practice.
Nitin Jadhav posted a patch to address the memory safety issue, but I
decided to follow Alvaro Herrera's suggestion from the initial
discussion, as it allows us to fix both the memory safety and logical
issues.
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reported-by: Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231115165737.zeulb575cgrbqo74@awork3.anarazel.de
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMm1aWbmYHM3bqtjyMQ-a+4Ub=dgsb_2E3_up2cn=UGdHNrGTg@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The following commands were allowed on partitioned tables, with
different effects:
1) ALTER TABLE SET [UN]LOGGED did not issue an error, and did not update
pg_class.relpersistence.
2) CREATE UNLOGGED TABLE was working with pg_class.relpersistence marked
as initially defined, but partitions did not inherit the UNLOGGED
property, which was confusing.
This commit causes the commands mentioned above to fail for partitioned
tables, instead.
pg_dump is tweaked so as partitioned tables marked as UNLOGGED ignore
the option when dumped from older server versions. pgbench needs a
tweak for --unlogged and --partitions=N to ignore the UNLOGGED option on
the partitioned tables created, its partitions still being unlogged.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZiiyGFTBNkqcMQi_@paquier.xyz
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This restriction seems to have come about due to some fuzzy thinking: in
commit 9139aa19423b we were adding a restriction against ADD constraint
ONLY on partitioned tables (which is sensible) and apparently we thought
the DROP case had to be symmetrical. However, it isn't, and the
comments about it are mistaken about the effect it would have. Remove
this limitation.
There have been no reports of users bothered by this limitation, so I'm
not backpatching it just yet. We can revisit this decision later, as needed.
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202409261752.nbvlawkxsttf@alvherre.pgsql
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7682253a-6f79-6a92-00aa-267c4c412870@lab.ntt.co.jp
(about commit 9139aa19423b, previously not registered)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Defect in last week's commit aac2c9b4fde889d13f859c233c2523345e72d32b,
per Coverity. Reaching this would need catalog corruption. Back-patch
to v12, like that commit.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The previous commit fixed some ways of losing an inplace update. It
remained possible to lose one when a backend working toward a
heap_update() copied a tuple into memory just before inplace update of
that tuple. In catalogs eligible for inplace update, use LOCKTAG_TUPLE
to govern admission to the steps of copying an old tuple, modifying it,
and issuing heap_update(). This includes MERGE commands. To avoid
changing most of the pg_class DDL, don't require LOCKTAG_TUPLE when
holding a relation lock sufficient to exclude inplace updaters.
Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions). In v13 and v12, "UPDATE
pg_class" or "UPDATE pg_database" can still lose an inplace update. The
v14+ UPDATE fix needs commit 86dc90056dfdbd9d1b891718d2e5614e3e432f35,
and it wasn't worth reimplementing that fix without such infrastructure.
Reviewed by Nitin Motiani and (in earlier versions) Heikki Linnakangas.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231027214946.79.nmisch@google.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Attempting these commands for a non-partitioned table would result in a
failure when creating the relation in transformPartitionCmd(). This
gives the possibility to throw an error earlier with a much better error
message, thanks to d69a3f4d70b7.
The extra test cases are from me. Note that FINALIZE uses a different
subcommand and it had no coverage for its failure path with
non-partitioned tables.
Author: Álvaro Herrera, Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202409190803.tnis52adt2n5@alvherre.pgsql
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Partitioned tables and normal tables have been relying on ATT_TABLE in
ATSimplePermissions() to produce error messages that depend on the
relation's relkind, because both relkinds currently support the same set
of ALTER TABLE subcommands.
A patch to restrict SET LOGGED/UNLOGGED for partitioned tables is under
discussion, and introducing ATT_PARTITIONED_TABLE makes subcommand
restrictions for partitioned tables easier to deal with, so let's add
one. There is no functional change.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Zt6cDnwSvnuLLnak@paquier.xyz
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add PERIOD clause to foreign key constraint definitions. This is
supported for range and multirange types. Temporal foreign keys check
for range containment instead of equality.
This feature matches the behavior of the SQL standard temporal foreign
keys, but it works on PostgreSQL's native ranges instead of SQL's
"periods", which don't exist in PostgreSQL (yet).
Reference actions ON {UPDATE,DELETE} {CASCADE,SET NULL,SET DEFAULT}
are not supported yet.
(previously committed as 34768ee3616, reverted by 8aee330af55; this is
essentially unchanged from those)
Author: Paul A. Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Reviewed-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA+renyUApHgSZF9-nd-a0+OPGharLQLO=mDHcY4_qQ0+noCUVg@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add WITHOUT OVERLAPS clause to PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints.
These are backed by GiST indexes instead of B-tree indexes, since they
are essentially exclusion constraints with = for the scalar parts of
the key and && for the temporal part.
(previously committed as 46a0cd4cefb, reverted by 46a0cd4cefb; the new
part is this:)
Because 'empty' && 'empty' is false, the temporal PK/UQ constraint
allowed duplicates, which is confusing to users and breaks internal
expectations. For instance, when GROUP BY checks functional
dependencies on the PK, it allows selecting other columns from the
table, but in the presence of duplicate keys you could get the value
from any of their rows. So we need to forbid empties.
This all means that at the moment we can only support ranges and
multiranges for temporal PK/UQs, unlike the original patch (above).
Documentation and tests for this are added. But this could
conceivably be extended by introducing some more general support for
the notion of "empty" for other types.
Author: Paul A. Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Reviewed-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA+renyUApHgSZF9-nd-a0+OPGharLQLO=mDHcY4_qQ0+noCUVg@mail.gmail.com
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This does not make sense. It would write the output of the USING
clause into the converted column, which would violate the generation
expression. This adds a check to error out if this is specified.
There was a test for this, but that test errored out for a different
reason, so it was not effective.
Reported-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/c7083982-69f4-4b14-8315-f9ddb20b9834%40eisentraut.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Both sub-commands use the same routine to switch the relpersistence of a
relation, duplicated the same checks, and used a style inconsistent with
access methods and tablespaces.
SET LOGEED/UNLOGGED is refactored to avoid any duplication, setting the
reason why a relation rewrite happens within ATPrepChangePersistence().
This shaves some code.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZiiyGFTBNkqcMQi_@paquier.xyz
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit reverts 1adf16b8fb, 87c21bb941, and subsequent fixes and
improvements including df64c81ca9, c99ef1811a, 9dfcac8e15, 885742b9f8,
842c9b2705, fcf80c5d5f, 96c7381c4c, f4fc7cb54b, 60ae37a8bc, 259c96fa8f,
449cdcd486, 3ca43dbbb6, 2a679ae94e, 3a82c689fd, fbd4321fd5, d53a4286d7,
c086896625, 4e5d6c4091, 04158e7fa3.
The reason for reverting is security issues related to repeatable name lookups
(CVE-2014-0062). Even though 04158e7fa3 solved part of the problem, there
are still remaining issues, which aren't feasible to even carefully analyze
before the RC deadline.
Reported-by: Noah Misch, Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240808171351.a9.nmisch%40google.com
Backpatch-through: 17
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, createPartitionTable() opens newly created table using its name.
This approach is prone to privilege escalation attack, because we might end
up opening another table than we just created.
This commit address the issue above by opening newly created table by its
OID. It appears to be tricky to get a relation OID out of ProcessUtility().
We have to extend TableLikeClause with new newRelationOid field, which is
filled within ProcessUtility() to be further accessed by caller.
Security: CVE-2014-0062
Reported-by: Noah Misch
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240808171351.a9.nmisch%40google.com
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov, Dmitry Koval
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apply the same code simplification to ATExecAddColumn as was done in
7ff9afbbd: apply GETSTRUCT() once instead of doing it repeatedly in
the same function.
Author: Tender Wang
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHewXNkO9+U437jvKT14s0MCu6Qpf6G-p2mZK5J9mAi4cHDgpQ@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apply GETSTRUCT() once instead of doing it repeatedly in the same
function. This simplifies the notation and makes the function's
structure more similar to the surrounding ones.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/a368248e-69e4-40be-9c07-6c3b5880b0a6@eisentraut.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Trying to attach a table as a partition which is already on the
referenced side of a foreign key on the partitioned table that it is
being attached to, leads to strange behavior: we try to clone the
foreign key from the parent to the partition, but this new FK points to
the partition itself, and the mix of pg_constraint rows and triggers
doesn't behave well.
Rather than trying to untangle the mess (which might be possible given
sufficient time), I opted to forbid the ATTACH. This doesn't seem a
problematic restriction, given that we already fail to create the
foreign key if you do it the other way around, that is, having the
partition first and the FK second.
Backpatch to all supported branches.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18541-628a61bc267cd2d3@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There was no need for these to be static buffers, local variables work
just as well. I think they were marked as 'static' to imply that they
are read-only, but 'const' is more appropriate for that, so change
them to const.
To make it possible to mark the variables as 'const', also add 'const'
decorations to the transformRelOptions() signature.
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/54c29fb0-edf2-48ea-9814-44e918bbd6e8@iki.fi
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We restrict typed tables (those declared as "OF composite_type")
to be based on stand-alone composite types, not composite types
that are the implicitly-created rowtypes of other tables.
But if you tried to do that, you got the very confusing error
message "type foo is not a composite type". Provide a more specific
message for that case. Also clarify related documentation in the
CREATE TABLE man page.
Erik Wienhold and David G. Johnston, per complaint from Hannu Krosing.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMT0RQRysCb_Amy5CTENSc5GfsvXL1a4qX3mv_hx31_v74P==g@mail.gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As commit ca4103025d stated, new partitions without a specified tablespace
should inherit the parent relation's tablespace. However, previously,
ALTER TABLE MERGE PARTITIONS and ALTER TABLE SPLIT PARTITION commands
always created new partitions in the default tablespace, ignoring
the parent's tablespace. This commit ensures new partitions inherit
the parent's tablespace.
Backpatch to v17 where these commands were introduced.
Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/abaf390b-3320-40a5-8815-ef476db5cfe7@oss.nttdata.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When a partitioned table has an index that doesn't support a constraint,
but a partition has an equivalent index that does, then a DETACH
operation would misbehave: a crash in assertion-enabled systems (because
we fail to find the constraint in the parent that we expect to), or a
broken coninhcount value (-1) in production systems (because we blindly
believe that we've successfully detached the parent).
While we should reject an ATTACH of a partition with such an index, we
have failed to do so in existing releases, so adding an error in stable
releases might break the (unlikely) existing applications that rely on
this behavior. At this point I don't even want to reject them in
master, because it'd break pg_upgrade if such databases exist, and there
would be no easy way to fix existing databases without expensive index
rebuilds.
(Later on we could add ALTER TABLE ... ADD CONSTRAINT USING INDEX to
partitioned tables, which would allow the user to fix such patterns. At
that point we could add more restrictions to prevent the problem from
its root.)
Also, add a test case that leaves one table in this condition, so that
we can verify that pg_upgrade continues to work if we later decide to
change the policy on the master branch.
Backpatch to all supported branches.
Co-authored-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18500-62948b6fe5522f56@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All the errors triggered in the code paths patched here would cause the
backend to issue an internal_error errcode, which is a state that should
be used only for "can't happen" situations. However, these code paths
are reachable by the regression tests, and could be seen by users in
valid cases. Some regression tests expect internal errcodes as they
manipulate the backend state to cause corruption (like checksums), or
use elog() because it is more convenient (like injection points), these
have no need to change.
This reduces the number of internal failures triggered in a check-world
by more than half, while providing correct errcodes for these valid
cases.
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Zic_GNgos5sMxKoa@paquier.xyz
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BuildDescForRelation() goes out of its way to fill in
->constr->has_not_null, but that value is not used for anything later,
so this code can all be removed. Note that BuildDescForRelation()
doesn't make any effort to fill in the rest of ->constr, so there is
no claim that that structure is completely filled in.
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Rybak <tomasz.rybak@post.pl>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/a368248e-69e4-40be-9c07-6c3b5880b0a6@eisentraut.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 5b562644fec696977df4a82790064e8287927891 added a comment that
SetRelationHasSubclass() callers must hold this lock. When commit
17f206fbc824d2b4b14480199ca9ff7dea417eda extended use of this column to
partitioned indexes, it didn't take the lock. As the latter commit
message mentioned, we currently never reset a partitioned index to
relhassubclass=f. That largely avoids harm from the lock omission. The
cause for fixing this now is to unblock introducing a rule about locks
required to heap_update() a pg_class row. This might cause more
deadlocks. It gives minor user-visible benefits:
- If an ALTER INDEX SET TABLESPACE runs concurrently with ALTER TABLE
ATTACH PARTITION or CREATE PARTITION OF, one transaction blocks
instead of failing with "tuple concurrently updated". (Many cases of
DDL concurrency still fail that way.)
- Match ALTER INDEX ATTACH PARTITION in choosing to lock the index.
While not user-visible today, we'll need this if we ever make something
set the flag to false for a partitioned index, like ANALYZE does today
for tables. Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions), the plan for
the commit relying on the new rule. In back branches, add
LockOrStrongerHeldByMe() instead of adding a LockHeldByMe() parameter.
Reviewed (in an earlier version) by Robert Haas.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240611024525.9f.nmisch@google.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions in a few places. These
inconsistencies were all introduced during Postgres 17 development.
pg_bsd_indent still has a couple of similar inconsistencies, which I
(pgeoghegan) have left untouched for now.
This commit was written with help from clang-tidy, by mechanically
applying the same rules as similar clean-up commits (the earliest such
commit was commit 035ce1fe).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Normally this case isn't even reachable by non-superusers, since
permissions checks prevent naming such a table. However, it is
possible to make it happen by altering a parent table whose child
is another session's temp table.
We definitely can't support any such ALTER that requires modifying
the contents of such a table, since we lack access to the other
session's temporary-buffer pool. But there seems no good reason
to allow it even if it'd only require changing catalog contents.
One reason not to allow it is that we'd rather not expose the
implementation-dependent behavior of whether a specific ALTER
requires touching the table contents. Another is that there may
be (in future, even if not today) optimizations that assume that
a session's own temp tables won't be modified by other sessions.
Hence, add a RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP() check to all the places
where ALTER TABLE currently does CheckTableNotInUse(). (I looked
through all other callers of CheckTableNotInUse(), and they seem
OK already.)
Per bug #18492 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18492-c7a2634bf4968763@postgresql.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When MERGE/SPLIT created new partitions, it was cloning the extended
statistics of the parent table.
However, extended stats on partitioned tables don't behave like
indexes on partitioned tables (which exist only to create physical
indexes on child tables). Rather, extended stats on a parent 1) cause
extended stats to be collected and computed across the whole partition
hierarchy, and 2) do not cause extended stats to be computed for the
individual partitions.
"CREATE TABLE ... PARTITION OF" command doesn't copy extended
statistics. This commit makes createPartitionTable() behave
consistently.
Reported-by: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZiJW1g2nbQs9ekwK%40pryzbyj2023
Author: Alexander Korotkov, Justin Pryzby
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Both MERGE and SPLIT partition operations support the case when the name of the
new partition matches the name of the existing partition to be merged/split.
But the name collision detection doesn't always work as intended. The SPLIT
partition operation finds the namespace to search for an existing partition
without taking into account the parent's persistence. The MERGE partition
operation checks for the name collision with simple equal() on RangeVar's
simply ignoring the search_path.
This commit fixes this behavior as follows.
1. The SPLIT partition operation now finds the namespace to search for
an existing partition according to the parent's persistence.
2. The MERGE partition operation now checks for the name collision similarly
to the SPLIT partition operation using
RangeVarGetAndCheckCreationNamespace() and get_relname_relid().
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/86b4f1e3-0b5d-315c-9225-19860d64d685%40gmail.com
Author: Dmitry Koval, Alexander Korotkov
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This feature set did not handle empty ranges correctly, and it's now
too late for PostgreSQL 17 to fix it.
The following commits are reverted:
6db4598fcb8 Add stratnum GiST support function
46a0cd4cefb Add temporal PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints
86232a49a43 Fix comment on gist_stratnum_btree
030e10ff1a3 Rename pg_constraint.conwithoutoverlaps to conperiod
a88c800deb6 Use daterange and YMD in without_overlaps tests instead of tsrange.
5577a71fb0c Use half-open interval notation in without_overlaps tests
34768ee3616 Add temporal FOREIGN KEY contraints
482e108cd38 Add test for REPLICA IDENTITY with a temporal key
c3db1f30cba doc: clarify PERIOD and WITHOUT OVERLAPS in CREATE TABLE
144c2ce0cc7 Fix ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING/UPDATE for temporal indexes
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d0b64a7a-dfe4-4b84-a906-c7dedfa40a3e@eisentraut.org
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are some problems with the new way to handle these constraints
that were detected at the last minute, and require fixes that appear too
invasive to be doing this late in the cycle. Revert this (again) for
now, we'll try again with these problems fixed.
The following commits are reverted:
b0e96f311985 Catalog not-null constraints
9b581c534186 Disallow changing NO INHERIT status of a not-null constraint
d0ec2ddbe088 Fix not-null constraint test
ac22a9545ca9 Move privilege check to the right place
b0f7dd915bca Check stack depth in new recursive functions
3af721794272 Update information_schema definition for not-null constraints
c3709100be73 Fix propagating attnotnull in multiple inheritance
d9f686a72ee9 Fix restore of not-null constraints with inheritance
d72d32f52d26 Don't try to assign smart names to constraints
0cd711271d42 Better handle indirect constraint drops
13daa33fa5a6 Disallow NO INHERIT not-null constraints on partitioned tables
d45597f72fe5 Disallow direct change of NO INHERIT of not-null constraints
21ac38f498b3 Fix inconsistencies in error messages
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202405110940.joxlqcx4dogd@alvherre.pgsql
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It turns out that we broke this in commit e5bc9454e, because
the code was assuming that no dependent types would appear
among the extension's direct dependencies, and now they do.
This isn't terribly hard to fix: just skip dependent types,
expecting that we will recurse to them when we process the parent
object (which should also be among the direct dependencies).
But a little bit of refactoring is needed so that we can avoid
duplicating logic about what is a dependent type.
Although there is some testing of ALTER EXTENSION SET SCHEMA,
it failed to cover interesting cases, so add more tests.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/930191.1715205151@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reported by Kyotaro Horiguchi
Also some comments mentioning wrong version numbers, spotted by Justin
Pryzby.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240507.171724.750916195320223609.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Zh0aAH7tbZb-9HbC@pryzbyj2023
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When changing the data type of a column of a partitioned table, craft
the ALTER SEQUENCE command only once. Partitions do not have identity
sequences of their own and thus do not need a ALTER SEQUENCE command
for each partition.
Fix getIdentitySequence() to fetch the identity sequence associated
with the top-level partitioned table when a Relation of a partition is
passed to it. While doing so, translate the attribute number of the
partition into the attribute number of the partitioned table.
Author: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3b8a9dc1-bbc7-0ef5-6863-c432afac7d59@gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While converting a pg_attribute tuple into a ColumnDef,
ColumnDef::compression remains NULL if there is no compression method
set fot the attribute. Calling strcmp() with NULL
ColumnDef::compression, when comparing compression methods of parents,
causes segmentation fault in MergeInheritedAttribute(). Skip
comparing compression methods if either of them is NULL.
Author: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b22a6834-aacb-7b18-0424-a3f5fe889667%40gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Same as 42b041243, except that the trouble case is a publication
WHERE clause that depends on a column.
Again reported by Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to v15 where
we added publication WHERE clauses.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/548a47bc-87ae-b3df-c6a2-60b9966f808b@gmail.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We support changing NO INHERIT constraint to INHERIT for constraints in
child relations when adding a constraint to some ancestor relation, and
also during pg_upgrade's schema restore; but other than those special
cases, command ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT should not be allowed to
change an existing constraint from NO INHERIT to INHERIT, as that would
require to process child relations so that they also acquire an
appropriate constraint, which we may not be in a position to do. (It'd
also be surprising behavior.)
It is conceivable that we want to allow ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL to make
such a change; but in that case some more code is needed to implement it
correctly, so for now I've made that throw the same error message.
Also, during the prep phase of ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT, acquire locks
on all descendant tables; otherwise we might operate on child tables on
which no locks are held, particularly in the mode where a primary key
causes not-null constraints to be created on children.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7d923a66-55f0-3395-cd40-81c142b5448b@gmail.com
|
