aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
...
* Move code for managing PartitionDescs into a new file, partdesc.cRobert Haas2019-02-21
| | | | | | | | | | This is similar in spirit to the existing partbounds.c file in the same directory, except that there's a lot less code in the new file created by this commit. Pending work in this area proposes to add a bunch more code related to PartitionDescs, though, and this will give us a good place to put it. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZUwPf_uanjF==gTGBMJrn8uCq52XYvAEorNkLrUdoawg@mail.gmail.com
* Redesign the partition dependency mechanism.Tom Lane2019-02-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The original setup for dependencies of partitioned objects had serious problems: 1. It did not verify that a drop cascading to a partition-child object also cascaded to at least one of the object's partition parents. Now, normally a child object would share all its dependencies with one or another parent (e.g. a child index's opclass dependencies would be shared with the parent index), so that this oversight is usually harmless. But if some dependency failed to fit this pattern, the child could be dropped while all its parents remain, creating a logically broken situation. (It's easy to construct artificial cases that break it, such as attaching an unrelated extension dependency to the child object and then dropping the extension. I'm not sure if any less-artificial cases exist.) 2. Management of partition dependencies during ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION was complicated and buggy; for example, after detaching a partition table it was possible to create cases where a formerly-child index should be dropped and was not, because the correct set of dependencies had not been reconstructed. Less seriously, because multiple partition relationships were represented identically in pg_depend, there was an order-of-traversal dependency on which partition parent was cited in error messages. We also had some pre-existing order-of-traversal hazards for error messages related to internal and extension dependencies. This is cosmetic to users but causes testing problems. To fix #1, add a check at the end of the partition tree traversal to ensure that at least one partition parent got deleted. To fix #2, establish a new policy that partition dependencies are in addition to, not instead of, a child object's usual dependencies; in this way ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION need not cope with adding or removing the usual dependencies. To fix the cosmetic problem, distinguish between primary and secondary partition dependency entries in pg_depend, by giving them different deptypes. (They behave identically except for having different priorities for being cited in error messages.) This means that the former 'I' dependency type is replaced with new 'P' and 'S' types. This also fixes a longstanding bug that after handling an internal dependency by recursing to the owning object, findDependentObjects did not verify that the current target was now scheduled for deletion, and did not apply the current recursion level's objflags to it. Perhaps that should be back-patched; but in the back branches it would only matter if some concurrent transaction had removed the internal-linkage pg_depend entry before the recursive call found it, or the recursive call somehow failed to find it, both of which seem unlikely. Catversion bump because the contents of pg_depend change for partitioning relationships. Patch HEAD only. It's annoying that we're not fixing #2 in v11, but there seems no practical way to do so given that the problem is exactly a poor choice of what entries to put in pg_depend. We can't really fix that while staying compatible with what's in pg_depend in existing v11 installations. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzkypv1R+teZrr71U23J578NnTBt2X8+Y=Odr4pOdW1rXg@mail.gmail.com
* Refactor planner's header files.Tom Lane2019-01-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Create a new header optimizer/optimizer.h, which exposes just the planner functions that can be used "at arm's length", without need to access Paths or the other planner-internal data structures defined in nodes/relation.h. This is intended to provide the whole planner API seen by most of the rest of the system; although FDWs still need to use additional stuff, and more thought is also needed about just what selfuncs.c should rely on. The main point of doing this now is to limit the amount of new #include baggage that will be needed by "planner support functions", which I expect to introduce later, and which will be in relevant datatype modules rather than anywhere near the planner. This commit just moves relevant declarations into optimizer.h from other header files (a couple of which go away because everything got moved), and adjusts #include lists to match. There's further cleanup that could be done if we want to decide that some stuff being exposed by optimizer.h doesn't belong in the planner at all, but I'll leave that for another day. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11460.1548706639@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Remove argument isprimary from index_build()Michael Paquier2019-01-24
| | | | | | | | | The flag was introduced in 3fdeb18, but f66e8bf actually forgot to finish the cleanup as index_update_stats() has simplified its interface. Author: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190122080852.GB3873@paquier.xyz
* Remove superfluous tqual.h includes.Andres Freund2019-01-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | Most of these had been obsoleted by 568d4138c / the SnapshotNow removal. This is is preparation for moving most of tqual.[ch] into either snapmgr.h or heapam.h, which in turn is in preparation for pluggable table AMs. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180703070645.wchpu5muyto5n647@alap3.anarazel.de
* Replace uses of heap_open et al with the corresponding table_* function.Andres Freund2019-01-21
| | | | | Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190111000539.xbv7s6w7ilcvm7dp@alap3.anarazel.de
* Don't include heapam.h from others headers.Andres Freund2019-01-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | heapam.h previously was included in a number of widely used headers (e.g. execnodes.h, indirectly in executor.h, ...). That's problematic on its own, as heapam.h contains a lot of low-level details that don't need to be exposed that widely, but becomes more problematic with the upcoming introduction of pluggable table storage - it seems inappropriate for heapam.h to be included that widely afterwards. heapam.h was largely only included in other headers to get the HeapScanDesc typedef (which was defined in heapam.h, even though HeapScanDescData is defined in relscan.h). The better solution here seems to be to just use the underlying struct (forward declared where necessary). Similar for BulkInsertState. Another problem was that LockTupleMode was used in executor.h - parts of the file tried to cope without heapam.h, but due to the fact that it indirectly included it, several subsequent violations of that goal were not not noticed. We could just reuse the approach of declaring parameters as int, but it seems nicer to move LockTupleMode to lockoptions.h - that's not a perfect location, but also doesn't seem bad. As a number of files relied on implicitly included heapam.h, a significant number of files grew an explicit include. It's quite probably that a few external projects will need to do the same. Author: Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Alvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190114000701.y4ttcb74jpskkcfb@alap3.anarazel.de
* Fix unique INCLUDE indexes on partitioned tablesAlvaro Herrera2019-01-14
| | | | | | | | | | We were considering the INCLUDE columns as part of the key, allowing unicity-violating rows to be inserted in different partitions. Concurrent development conflict in eb7ed3f30634 and 8224de4f42cc. Reported-by: Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190109065109.GA4285@telsasoft.com
* Update copyright for 2019Bruce Momjian2019-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.4
* Remove some useless codeAlvaro Herrera2018-12-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | In commit 8b08f7d4820f I added member relationId to IndexStmt struct. I'm now not sure why; DefineIndex doesn't need it, since the relation OID is passed as a separate argument anyway. Remove it. Also remove a redundant assignment to the relationId argument (it wasn't redundant when added by commit e093dcdd285, but should have been removed in commit 5f173040e3), and use relationId instead of stmt->relation when locking the relation in the second phase of CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY, which is not only confusing but it means we resolve the name twice for no reason.
* Remove obsolete IndexIs* macrosPeter Eisentraut2018-12-27
| | | | | | | | | Remove IndexIsValid(), IndexIsReady(), IndexIsLive() in favor of accessing the index structure directly. These macros haven't been used consistently, and the original reason of maintaining source compatibility with PostgreSQL 9.2 is gone. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/d419147c-09d4-6196-5d9d-0234b230880a%402ndquadrant.com
* Don't mark partitioned indexes invalid unnecessarilyAlvaro Herrera2018-12-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When an indexes is created on a partitioned table using ONLY (don't recurse to partitions), it gets marked invalid until index partitions are attached for each table partition. But there's no reason to do this if there are no partitions ... and moreover, there's no way to get the index to become valid afterwards, because all partitions that get created/attached get their own index partition already attached to the parent index, so there's no chance to do ALTER INDEX ... ATTACH PARTITION that would make the parent index valid. Fix by not marking the index as invalid to begin with. This is very similar to 9139aa19423b, but the pg_dump aspect does not appear to be relevant until we add FKs that can point to PKs on partitioned tables. (I tried to cause the pg_upgrade test to break by leaving some of these bogus tables around, but wasn't able to.) Making this change means that an index that was supposed to be invalid in the insert_conflict regression test is no longer invalid; reorder the DDL so that the test continues to verify the behavior we want it to. Author: Álvaro Herrera Reviewed-by: Amit Langote Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181203225019.2vvdef2ybnkxt364@alvherre.pgsql
* Remove WITH OIDS support, change oid catalog column visibility.Andres Freund2018-11-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously tables declared WITH OIDS, including a significant fraction of the catalog tables, stored the oid column not as a normal column, but as part of the tuple header. This special column was not shown by default, which was somewhat odd, as it's often (consider e.g. pg_class.oid) one of the more important parts of a row. Neither pg_dump nor COPY included the contents of the oid column by default. The fact that the oid column was not an ordinary column necessitated a significant amount of special case code to support oid columns. That already was painful for the existing, but upcoming work aiming to make table storage pluggable, would have required expanding and duplicating that "specialness" significantly. WITH OIDS has been deprecated since 2005 (commit ff02d0a05280e0). Remove it. Removing includes: - CREATE TABLE and ALTER TABLE syntax for declaring the table to be WITH OIDS has been removed (WITH (oids[ = true]) will error out) - pg_dump does not support dumping tables declared WITH OIDS and will issue a warning when dumping one (and ignore the oid column). - restoring an pg_dump archive with pg_restore will warn when restoring a table with oid contents (and ignore the oid column) - COPY will refuse to load binary dump that includes oids. - pg_upgrade will error out when encountering tables declared WITH OIDS, they have to be altered to remove the oid column first. - Functionality to access the oid of the last inserted row (like plpgsql's RESULT_OID, spi's SPI_lastoid, ...) has been removed. The syntax for declaring a table WITHOUT OIDS (or WITH (oids = false) for CREATE TABLE) is still supported. While that requires a bit of support code, it seems unnecessary to break applications / dumps that do not use oids, and are explicit about not using them. The biggest user of WITH OID columns was postgres' catalog. This commit changes all 'magic' oid columns to be columns that are normally declared and stored. To reduce unnecessary query breakage all the newly added columns are still named 'oid', even if a table's column naming scheme would indicate 'reloid' or such. This obviously requires adapting a lot code, mostly replacing oid access via HeapTupleGetOid() with access to the underlying Form_pg_*->oid column. The bootstrap process now assigns oids for all oid columns in genbki.pl that do not have an explicit value (starting at the largest oid previously used), only oids assigned later by oids will be above FirstBootstrapObjectId. As the oid column now is a normal column the special bootstrap syntax for oids has been removed. Oids are not automatically assigned during insertion anymore, all backend code explicitly assigns oids with GetNewOidWithIndex(). For the rare case that insertions into the catalog via SQL are called for the new pg_nextoid() function can be used (which only works on catalog tables). The fact that oid columns on system tables are now normal columns means that they will be included in the set of columns expanded by * (i.e. SELECT * FROM pg_class will now include the table's oid, previously it did not). It'd not technically be hard to hide oid column by default, but that'd mean confusing behavior would either have to be carried forward forever, or it'd cause breakage down the line. While it's not unlikely that further adjustments are needed, the scope/invasiveness of the patch makes it worthwhile to get merge this now. It's painful to maintain externally, too complicated to commit after the code code freeze, and a dependency of a number of other patches. Catversion bump, for obvious reasons. Author: Andres Freund, with contributions by John Naylor Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180930034810.ywp2c7awz7opzcfr@alap3.anarazel.de
* Set pg_class.relhassubclass for partitioned indexesMichael Paquier2018-10-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Like for relations, switching this parameter is optimistic by turning it on each time a partitioned index gains a partition. So seeing this parameter set to true means that the partitioned index has or has had partitions. The flag cannot be reset yet for partitioned indexes, which is something not obvious anyway as partitioned relations exist to have partitions. This allows to track more conveniently partition trees for indexes, which will come in use with an upcoming patch helping in listing partition trees with an SQL-callable function. Author: Amit Langote Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/80306490-b5fc-ea34-4427-f29c52156052@lab.ntt.co.jp
* Fix event triggers for partitioned tablesAlvaro Herrera2018-10-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Index DDL cascading on partitioned tables introduced a way for ALTER TABLE to be called reentrantly. This caused an an important deficiency in event trigger support to be exposed: on exiting the reentrant call, the alter table state object was clobbered, causing a crash when the outer alter table tries to finalize its processing. Fix the crash by creating a stack of event trigger state objects. There are still ways to cause things to misbehave (and probably other crashers) with more elaborate tricks, but at least it now doesn't crash in the obvious scenario. Backpatch to 9.5, where DDL deparsing of event triggers was introduced. Reported-by: Marco Slot Authors: Michaël Paquier, Álvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANNhMLCpi+HQ7M36uPfGbJZEQLyTy7XvX=5EFkpR-b1bo0uJew@mail.gmail.com
* Fully enforce uniqueness of constraint names.Tom Lane2018-09-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It's been true for a long time that we expect names of table and domain constraints to be unique among the constraints of that table or domain. However, the enforcement of that has been pretty haphazard, and it missed some corner cases such as creating a CHECK constraint and then an index constraint of the same name (as per recent report from André Hänsel). Also, due to the lack of an actual unique index enforcing this, duplicates could be created through race conditions. Moreover, the code that searches pg_constraint has been quite inconsistent about how to handle duplicate names if one did occur: some places checked and threw errors if there was more than one match, while others just processed the first match they came to. To fix, create a unique index on (conrelid, contypid, conname). Since either conrelid or contypid is zero, this will separately enforce uniqueness of constraint names among constraints of any one table and any one domain. (If we ever implement SQL assertions, and put them into this catalog, more thought might be needed. But it'd be at least as reasonable to put them into a new catalog; having overloaded this one catalog with two kinds of constraints was a mistake already IMO.) This index can replace the existing non-unique index on conrelid, though we need to keep the one on contypid for query performance reasons. Having done that, we can simplify the logic in various places that either coped with duplicates or neglected to, as well as potentially improve lookup performance when searching for a constraint by name. Also, as per our usual practice, install a preliminary check so that you get something more friendly than a unique-index violation report in the case complained of by André. And teach ChooseIndexName to avoid choosing autogenerated names that would draw such a failure. While it's not possible to make such a change in the back branches, it doesn't seem quite too late to put this into v11, so do so. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0c1001d4428f$0942b430$1bc81c90$@webkr.de
* Restrict access to reindex of shared catalogs for non-privileged usersMichael Paquier2018-08-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A database owner running a database-level REINDEX has the possibility to also do the operation on shared system catalogs without being an owner of them, which allows him to block resources it should not have access to. The same goes for a schema owner. For example, PostgreSQL would go unresponsive and even block authentication if a lock is waited for pg_authid. This commit makes sure that a user running a REINDEX SYSTEM, DATABASE or SCHEMA only works on the following relations: - The user is a superuser - The user is the table owner - The user is the database/schema owner, only if the relation worked on is not shared. Robert has worded most the documentation changes, and I have coded the core part. Reported-by: Lloyd Albin, Jeremy Schneider Author: Michael Paquier, Robert Haas Reviewed by: Nathan Bossart, Kyotaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/152512087100.19803.12733865831237526317@wrigleys.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180805211059.GA2185@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 11- as the current behavior has been around for a very long time and could be disruptive for already released branches.
* Drop the rule against included index columns duplicating key columns.Tom Lane2018-07-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The initial version of the included-index-column feature stated that included columns couldn't be the same as any key column of the index. While it'd be pretty silly to do that, since the included column would be entirely redundant, we've never prohibited redundant index columns before so it's not very consistent to do so here. Moreover, the prohibition was itself badly implemented, so that it failed to reject columns that were effectively identical but not spelled quite alike, as reported by Aditya Toshniwal. (Moreover, it's not hard to imagine that for some non-btree index types, such cases would be non-silly anyhow: the index might use a lossy representation for key columns but be able to support retrieval of the original form of included columns.) Hence, let's just drop the prohibition. In passing, do some copy-editing on the documentation for the included-column feature. Yugo Nagata; documentation and test corrections by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAM9w-_mhBCys4fQNfaiQKTRrVWtoFrZ-wXmDuE9Nj5y-Y7aDKQ@mail.gmail.com
* pgindent run prior to branchingAndrew Dunstan2018-06-30
|
* Fix crash when ALTER TABLE recreates indexes on partitionsAlvaro Herrera2018-06-29
| | | | | | | | | The skip_build flag was not being passed correctly when recursing to indexes on partitions, leading to attempts to rebuild indexes when they were not yet ready to be rebuilt. Reported-by: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKcux6mxNCGsgATwf5CGMF8g4WSupCXicCVMeKUTuWbyxHOMsQ@mail.gmail.com
* When index recurses to a partition, map columns numbersAlvaro Herrera2018-06-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Two out of three code paths were mapping column numbers correctly if a partition had different column numbers than parent table, but the most commonly used one (recursing in CREATE INDEX to a new index on a partition) failed to map attribute numbers in expressions. Oddly enough, attnums in WHERE clauses are already handled correctly everywhere. Reported-by: Amit Langote Author: Amit Langote Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/dce1fda4-e0f0-94c9-6abb-f5956a98c057@lab.ntt.co.jp Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera
* Clean up warnings from -Wimplicit-fallthrough.Tom Lane2018-05-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Recent gcc can warn about switch-case fall throughs that are not explicitly labeled as intentional. This seems like a good thing, so clean up the warnings exposed thereby by labeling all such cases with comments that gcc will recognize. In files that already had one or more suitable comments, I generally matched the existing style of those. Otherwise I went with /* FALLTHROUGH */, which is one of the spellings approved at the more-restrictive-than-default level -Wimplicit-fallthrough=4. (At the default level you can also spell it /* FALL ?THRU */, and it's not picky about case. What you can't do is include additional text in the same comment, so some existing comments containing versions of this aren't good enough.) Testing with gcc 8.0.1 (Fedora 28's current version), I found that I also had to put explicit "break"s after elog(ERROR) or ereport(ERROR); apparently, for this purpose gcc doesn't recognize that those don't return. That seems like possibly a gcc bug, but it's fine because in most places we did that anyway; so this amounts to a visit from the style police. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15083.1525207729@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Post-feature-freeze pgindent run.Tom Lane2018-04-26
| | | | Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15719.1523984266@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Better fix for deadlock hazard in CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY.Tom Lane2018-04-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 54eff5311 did not account for the possibility that we'd have a transaction snapshot due to default_transaction_isolation being set high enough to require one. The transaction snapshot is enough to hold back our advertised xmin and thus risk deadlock anyway. The only way to get rid of that snap is to start a new transaction, so let's do that instead. Also throw in an assert checking that we really have gotten to a state where no xmin is being advertised. Back-patch to 9.4, like the previous commit. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1ztk3TpQdcUNbxq93pc80FrXUjpDWLGMeVBDx71GHNwZQ@mail.gmail.com
* Reorganize partitioning codeAlvaro Herrera2018-04-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There's been a massive addition of partitioning code in PostgreSQL 11, with little oversight on its placement, resulting in a catalog/partition.c with poorly defined boundaries and responsibilities. This commit tries to set a couple of distinct modules to separate things a little bit. There are no code changes here, only code movement. There are three new files: src/backend/utils/cache/partcache.c src/include/partitioning/partdefs.h src/include/utils/partcache.h The previous arrangement of #including catalog/partition.h almost everywhere is no more. Authors: Amit Langote and Álvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/98e8d509-790a-128c-be7f-e48a5b2d8d97@lab.ntt.co.jp https://postgr.es/m/11aa0c50-316b-18bb-722d-c23814f39059@lab.ntt.co.jp https://postgr.es/m/143ed9a4-6038-76d4-9a55-502035815e68@lab.ntt.co.jp https://postgr.es/m/20180413193503.nynq7bnmgh6vs5vm@alvherre.pgsql
* Fix interference between covering indexes and partitioned tablesTeodor Sigaev2018-04-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The bug is caused due to the original IndexStmt that DefineIndex receives being overwritten when processing the INCLUDE columns. Use separate list of index params to propagate to child tables. Add tests covering this case. Amit Langote and Alexander Korotkov. Re-commit 5c6110c6a960ad6fe1b0d0fec6ae36ef4eb913f5 because it discovered a bug fixed in c266ed31a8a3beed3533e6a78faeca78234cbd43 Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJGNTeO%3DBguEyG8wxMpU_Vgvg3nGGzy71zUQ0RpzEn_mb0bSWA%40mail.gmail.com
* Cleanup covering infrastructureTeodor Sigaev2018-04-12
| | | | | | | | | | | - Explicitly forbids opclass, collation and indoptions (like DESC/ASC etc) for including columns. Throw an error if user points that. - Truncated storage arrays for such attributes to store only key atrributes, added assertion checks. - Do not check opfamily and collation for including columns in CompareIndexInfo() Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5ee72852-3c4e-ee35-e2ed-c1d053d45c08@sigaev.ru
* Rename IndexInfo.ii_KeyAttrNumbers arrayTeodor Sigaev2018-04-12
| | | | | | | | Rename ii_KeyAttrNumbers to ii_IndexAttrNumbers to prevent confusion with ii_NumIndexAttrs/ii_NumIndexKeyAttrs. ii_IndexAttrNumbers contains all attributes including "including" columns, not only key attribute. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/13123421-1d52-d0e4-c95c-6d69011e0595%40sigaev.ru
* Temporary revert 5c6110c6a960ad6fe1b0d0fec6ae36ef4eb913f5Teodor Sigaev2018-04-11
| | | | It discovers one more bug in CompareIndexInfo(), should be fixed first.
* Fix interference between cavering indexes and partitioned tablesTeodor Sigaev2018-04-11
| | | | | | | | The bug is caused due to the original IndexStmt that DefineIndex receives being overwritten when processing the INCLUDE columns. Use separate list of index params to propagate to child tables. Add tests covering this case. Amit Langote and Alexander Korotkov.
* Fix additional breakage in covering-index patch.Tom Lane2018-04-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CheckIndexCompatible() misused ComputeIndexAttrs() by not bothering to fill ii_NumIndexAttrs and ii_NumIndexKeyAttrs in the passed IndexInfo. Omission of ii_NumIndexAttrs was previously unimportant, but now this matters because ComputeIndexAttrs depends on ii_NumIndexKeyAttrs to decide how many columns it needs to report on. (BTW, the fact that this oversight wasn't detected earlier implies that we have no regression test verifying whether CheckIndexCompatible ever succeeds. Bad dog. Not the job of this patch to fix it, though.) Also, change the API of ComputeIndexAttrs so that it fills the opclass output array for all column positions, as it does for the options output array; positions for non-key index columns are filled with zeroes. This isn't directly fixing any bug, but it seems like a good idea. Per valgrind failure reports from buildfarm. Alexander Korotkov, tweaked a bit by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfduWrysrT-qAhn+3Ea5+Mg6Vhc-oA6o2Z-hRCPRdvf3tiw@mail.gmail.com
* Merge catalog/pg_foo_fn.h headers back into pg_foo.h headers.Tom Lane2018-04-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Traditionally, include/catalog/pg_foo.h contains extern declarations for functions in backend/catalog/pg_foo.c, in addition to its function as the authoritative definition of the pg_foo catalog's rowtype. In some cases, we'd been forced to split out those extern declarations into separate pg_foo_fn.h headers so that the catalog definitions could be #include'd by frontend code. That problem is gone as of commit 9c0a0de4c, so let's undo the splits to make things less confusing. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/23690.1523031777@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Indexes with INCLUDE columns and their support in B-treeTeodor Sigaev2018-04-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch introduces INCLUDE clause to index definition. This clause specifies a list of columns which will be included as a non-key part in the index. The INCLUDE columns exist solely to allow more queries to benefit from index-only scans. Also, such columns don't need to have appropriate operator classes. Expressions are not supported as INCLUDE columns since they cannot be used in index-only scans. Index access methods supporting INCLUDE are indicated by amcaninclude flag in IndexAmRoutine. For now, only B-tree indexes support INCLUDE clause. In B-tree indexes INCLUDE columns are truncated from pivot index tuples (tuples located in non-leaf pages and high keys). Therefore, B-tree indexes now might have variable number of attributes. This patch also provides generic facility to support that: pivot tuples contain number of their attributes in t_tid.ip_posid. Free 13th bit of t_info is used for indicating that. This facility will simplify further support of index suffix truncation. The changes of above are backward-compatible, pg_upgrade doesn't need special handling of B-tree indexes for that. Bump catalog version Author: Anastasia Lubennikova with contribition by Alexander Korotkov and me Reviewed by: Peter Geoghegan, Tomas Vondra, Antonin Houska, Jeff Janes, David Rowley, Alexander Korotkov Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/56168952.4010101@postgrespro.ru
* Combine options for RangeVarGetRelidExtended() into a flags argument.Andres Freund2018-03-30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | A followup patch will add a SKIP_LOCKED option. To avoid introducing evermore arguments, breaking existing callers each time, introduce a flags argument. This'll no doubt break a few external users... Also change the MISSING_OK behaviour so a DEBUG1 debug message is emitted when a relation is not found. Author: Nathan Bossart Reviewed-By: Michael Paquier and Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180306005349.b65whmvj7z6hbe2y@alap3.anarazel.de
* Fast ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a non-NULL defaultAndrew Dunstan2018-03-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently adding a column to a table with a non-NULL default results in a rewrite of the table. For large tables this can be both expensive and disruptive. This patch removes the need for the rewrite as long as the default value is not volatile. The default expression is evaluated at the time of the ALTER TABLE and the result stored in a new column (attmissingval) in pg_attribute, and a new column (atthasmissing) is set to true. Any existing row when fetched will be supplied with the attmissingval. New rows will have the supplied value or the default and so will never need the attmissingval. Any time the table is rewritten all the atthasmissing and attmissingval settings for the attributes are cleared, as they are no longer needed. The most visible code change from this is in heap_attisnull, which acquires a third TupleDesc argument, allowing it to detect a missing value if there is one. In many cases where it is known that there will not be any (e.g. catalog relations) NULL can be passed for this argument. Andrew Dunstan, heavily modified from an original patch from Serge Rielau. Reviewed by Tom Lane, Andres Freund, Tomas Vondra and David Rowley. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31e2e921-7002-4c27-59f5-51f08404c858@2ndQuadrant.com
* Fix CommandCounterIncrement in partition-related DDLAlvaro Herrera2018-03-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | It makes sense to do the CCIs in the places that do catalog updates, rather than before the places that error out because the former ones fail to do it. In particular, it looks like StorePartitionBound() and IndexSetParentIndex() ought to make their own CCIs. Per review comments from Peter Eisentraut for row-level triggers on partitioned tables. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171229225319.ajltgss2ojkfd3kp@alvherre.pgsql
* Avoid having two PKs in a partitionAlvaro Herrera2018-03-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If a table containing a primary key is attach as partition to a partitioned table which has a primary key with a different definition, we would happily create a second one in the new partition. Oops. It turns out that this is because an error check in DefineIndex is executed only if you tell it that it's being run by ALTER TABLE, and the original code here wasn't. Change it so that it does. Added a couple of test cases for this, also. A previously working test started to fail in a different way than before patch because the new check is called earlier; change the PK to plain UNIQUE so that the new behavior isn't invoked, so that the test continues to verify what we want it to verify. Reported by: Noriyoshi Shinoda Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DF4PR8401MB102060EC2615EC9227CC73F7EEDF0@DF4PR8401MB1020.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
* Clone extended stats in CREATE TABLE (LIKE INCLUDING ALL)Alvaro Herrera2018-03-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The LIKE INCLUDING ALL clause to CREATE TABLE intuitively indicates cloning of extended statistics on the source table, but it failed to do so. Patch it up so that it does. Also include an INCLUDING STATISTICS option to the LIKE clause, so that the behavior can be requested individually, or excluded individually. While at it, reorder the INCLUDING options, both in code and in docs, in alphabetical order which makes more sense than feature-implementation order that was previously used. Backpatch this to Postgres 10, where extended statistics were introduced, because this is seen as an oversight in a fresh feature which is better to get consistent from the get-go instead of changing only in pg11. In pg11, comments on statistics objects are cloned too. In pg10 they are not, because I (Álvaro) was too coward to change the parse node as required to support it. Also, in pg10 I chose not to renumber the parser symbols for the various INCLUDING options in LIKE, for the same reason. Any corresponding user-visible changes (docs) are backpatched, though. Reported-by: Stephen Froehlich Author: David Rowley Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Tomas Vondra Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CY1PR0601MB1927315B45667A1B679D0FD5E5EF0@CY1PR0601MB1927.namprd06.prod.outlook.com
* Allow UNIQUE indexes on partitioned tablesAlvaro Herrera2018-02-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If we restrict unique constraints on partitioned tables so that they must always include the partition key, then our standard approach to unique indexes already works --- each unique key is forced to exist within a single partition, so enforcing the unique restriction in each index individually is enough to have it enforced globally. Therefore we can implement unique indexes on partitions by simply removing a few restrictions (and adding others.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171222212921.hi6hg6pem2w2t36z@alvherre.pgsql Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171229230607.3iib6b62fn3uaf47@alvherre.pgsql Reviewed-by: Simon Riggs, Jesper Pedersen, Peter Eisentraut, Jaime Casanova, Amit Langote
* Support parallel btree index builds.Robert Haas2018-02-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | To make this work, tuplesort.c and logtape.c must also support parallelism, so this patch adds that infrastructure and then applies it to the particular case of parallel btree index builds. Testing to date shows that this can often be 2-3x faster than a serial index build. The model for deciding how many workers to use is fairly primitive at present, but it's better than not having the feature. We can refine it as we get more experience. Peter Geoghegan with some help from Rushabh Lathia. While Heikki Linnakangas is not an author of this patch, he wrote other patches without which this feature would not have been possible, and therefore the release notes should possibly credit him as an author of this feature. Reviewed by Claudio Freire, Heikki Linnakangas, Thomas Munro, Tels, Amit Kapila, me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAM3SWZQKM=Pzc=CAHzRixKjp2eO5Q0Jg1SoFQqeXFQ647JiwqQ@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=AxWqDoVvGU7dq856S4r6sJAj6DBn7VMtigkB33N5eyg@mail.gmail.com
* Replace AclObjectKind with ObjectTypePeter Eisentraut2018-01-19
| | | | | | | | | AclObjectKind was basically just another enumeration for object types, and we already have a preferred one for that. It's only used in aclcheck_error. By using ObjectType instead, we can also give some more precise error messages, for example "index" instead of "relation". Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
* Local partitioned indexesAlvaro Herrera2018-01-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When CREATE INDEX is run on a partitioned table, create catalog entries for an index on the partitioned table (which is just a placeholder since the table proper has no data of its own), and recurse to create actual indexes on the existing partitions; create them in future partitions also. As a convenience gadget, if the new index definition matches some existing index in partitions, these are picked up and used instead of creating new ones. Whichever way these indexes come about, they become attached to the index on the parent table and are dropped alongside it, and cannot be dropped on isolation unless they are detached first. To support pg_dump'ing these indexes, add commands CREATE INDEX ON ONLY <table> (which creates the index on the parent partitioned table, without recursing) and ALTER INDEX ATTACH PARTITION (which is used after the indexes have been created individually on each partition, to attach them to the parent index). These reconstruct prior database state exactly. Reviewed-by: (in alphabetical order) Peter Eisentraut, Robert Haas, Amit Langote, Jesper Pedersen, Simon Riggs, David Rowley Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171113170646.gzweigyrgg6pwsg4@alvherre.pgsql
* Update copyright for 2018Bruce Momjian2018-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.3
* Fix deadlock hazard in CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLYAlvaro Herrera2018-01-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Multiple sessions doing CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY simultaneously are supposed to be able to work in parallel, as evidenced by fixes in commit c3d09b3bd23f specifically to support this case. In reality, one of the sessions would be aborted by a misterious "deadlock detected" error. Jeff Janes diagnosed that this is because of leftover snapshots used for system catalog scans -- this was broken by 8aa3e47510b9 keeping track of (registering) the catalog snapshot. To fix the deadlocks, it's enough to de-register that snapshot prior to waiting. Backpatch to 9.4, which introduced MVCC catalog scans. Include an isolationtester spec that 8 out of 10 times reproduces the deadlock with the unpatched code for me (Álvaro). Author: Jeff Janes Diagnosed-by: Jeff Janes Reported-by: Jeremy Finzel Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMa1XUhHjCv8Qkx0WOr1Mpm_R4qxN26EibwCrj0Oor2YBUFUTg%40mail.gmail.com
* Simplify index_[constraint_]create APIAlvaro Herrera2017-11-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Instead of passing large swaths of boolean arguments, define some flags that can be used in a bitmask. This makes it easier not only to figure out what each call site is doing, but also to add some new flags. The flags are split in two -- one set for index_create directly and another for constraints. index_create() itself receives both, and then passes down the latter to index_constraint_create(), which can also be called standalone. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171023151251.j75uoe27gajdjmlm@alvherre.pgsql Reviewed-by: Simon Riggs
* Add some const decorations to prototypesPeter Eisentraut2017-11-10
| | | | Reviewed-by: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
* Rework DefineIndex relkind checkAlvaro Herrera2017-10-16
| | | | | | | | Simplify coding using a switch rather than nested if tests. Author: Álvaro Reviewed-by: Robert Haas, Amit Langote, Michaël Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171013163820.pai7djcaxrntaxtn@alvherre.pgsql
* Change tupledesc->attrs[n] to TupleDescAttr(tupledesc, n).Andres Freund2017-08-20
| | | | | | | | | | | This is a mechanical change in preparation for a later commit that will change the layout of TupleDesc. Introducing a macro to abstract the details of where attributes are stored will allow us to change that in separate step and revise it in future. Author: Thomas Munro, editorialized by Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0ZtQ-SpsgCyzzYpsXS6e=kZWqk3g5Ygn3MDV7A8dabUA@mail.gmail.com
* Phase 3 of pgindent updates.Tom Lane2017-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Don't move parenthesized lines to the left, even if that means they flow past the right margin. By default, BSD indent lines up statement continuation lines that are within parentheses so that they start just to the right of the preceding left parenthesis. However, traditionally, if that resulted in the continuation line extending to the right of the desired right margin, then indent would push it left just far enough to not overrun the margin, if it could do so without making the continuation line start to the left of the current statement indent. That makes for a weird mix of indentations unless one has been completely rigid about never violating the 80-column limit. This behavior has been pretty universally panned by Postgres developers. Hence, disable it with indent's new -lpl switch, so that parenthesized lines are always lined up with the preceding left paren. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Phase 2 of pgindent updates.Tom Lane2017-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-06-08 02:45:33 +0000