| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Author: Tender Wang
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHewXN%3D3sH2sNw4nC3QGCEVw1Lftmw9m5y1Xje0bXK6ApDrsPQ%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
_bt_first doesn't necessarily hold onto a buffer pin on success exit.
Fix header comments that claimed that we'll always hold onto a pin.
Oversight in commit 2ed5b87f96.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove a local variable that was used to avoid overwriting strat_total
with the = operator strategy when a >= operator strategy key was already
included in the initial positioning/insertion scan keys by _bt_first
(for backwards scans it would have to be a <= key that was included).
_bt_first's strat_total local variable now simply tracks the operator
strategy of the final scan key that was included in the scan's insertion
scan key (barring the case where the !used_all_subkeys row compare path
adjusts strat_total in its own way).
_bt_first already treated >= keys (or <= keys) as = keys for initial
positioning purposes. There is no good reason to remember that that was
what happened; no later _bt_first step cares about the distinction.
Note, in particular, that the insertion scan key's 'nextkey' and
'backward' fields will be initialized the same way regardless.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=PKR6rB7qbx+Vnd7eqeB5VTcrW=iJvAsTsKbdG+kW_UA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
_bt_endpoint is a helper function for _bt_first that's called whenever
no useful insertion scan key can be used, and we need to lock and read
either the leftmost or rightmost leaf page in the index. Simplify and
document its preconditions, relieving its _bt_first caller from having
to end the parallel scan when it returns false.
Also stop unnecessarily invalidating the current scan position in nearby
code in both _bt_first and _bt_endpoint. This seems to have been
copy-pasted from _bt_readnextpage, where invalidating the scan's current
position really is necessary.
Follow-up to the refactoring work in commit 1bd4bc85.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A CacheInvalidateHeapTuple* callee might call
CatalogCacheInitializeCache(), which needs a relcache entry. Acquiring
a valid relcache entry might scan pg_class. Hence, to prevent
undetected LWLock self-deadlock, CacheInvalidateHeapTuple* callers must
not hold BUFFER_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE on buffers of pg_class. Move the
CacheInvalidateHeapTupleInplace() before the BUFFER_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE. No
back-patch, since I've reverted commit
243e9b40f1b2dd09d6e5bf91ebf6e822a2cd3704 from non-master branches.
Reported by Alexander Lakhin. Reviewed by Alexander Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10ec0bc3-5933-1189-6bb8-5dec4114558e@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
| |
Oversight in commit 5bf748b8.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of talking about setting latches, which is a pretty low-level
mechanism, emphasize that they wake up other processes.
This is in preparation for replacing Latches with a new abstraction.
That's still work in progress, but this seems a little tidier anyway,
so let's get this refactoring out of the way already.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/391abe21-413e-4d91-a650-b663af49500c%40iki.fi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is in preparation for replacing Latches with a new abstraction.
That's still work in progress, but this seems a little tidier anyway,
so let's get this refactoring out of the way already.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/391abe21-413e-4d91-a650-b663af49500c%40iki.fi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Follow-up to bugfix commit 763d65ae. Technically this new assertion is
redundant with the assertion recently added to _bt_readpage by that same
commit, but it seems like a good idea to have both.
The new assertion makes it clear that we expect to call _bt_readnextpage
when there's another primitive index scan scheduled, though only when
needed as the final step of ending the current primitive scan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Strictly speaking, we only need to make sure to leave the scan's array
keys in their final positions (final for the current scan direction) to
handle SAOP array exhaustion because btgettuple might only return a
subset of the items for the final page (final for the current scan
direction), before the scan changes direction. While it's typical for
so->currPos to be invalidated shortly after the scan's arrays are first
exhausted, and while so->currPos invalidation does obviate the need to
leave the scan's arrays in any particular state, we can't rely on any of
that actually happening when handling array exhaustion. Adjust comments
to make all of that a lot clearer.
Oversight in commit 5bf748b8, which enhanced nbtree ScalarArrayOp
execution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A bug in nbtree's handling of primitive index scan scheduling could lead
to wrong answers when a scrollable cursor was used with an index scan
that had a SAOP index qual. Wrong answers were only possible when the
scan direction changed after a primitive scan was scheduled, but before
_bt_next was asked to fetch the next tuple in line (i.e. for things to
break, _bt_next had to be denied the opportunity to step off the page in
the same direction as the one used when the primscan was scheduled).
Furthermore, the issue only occurred when the page in question happened
to be the first page to be visited by the entire top-level scan; the
issue hinged upon the cursor backing up to the absolute beginning of the
key space that it returns tuples from (fetching in the opposite scan
direction across a "primitive scan boundary" always worked correctly).
To fix, make _bt_next unset the "needs primitive index scan" flag when
it detects that the current scan direction is not the one that was used
by _bt_readpage back when the primitive scan in question was scheduled.
This fixes the cases that are known to be faulty, and also seems like a
good idea on general robustness grounds.
Affected scrollable cursor cases now avoid a spurious primitive index
scan when they fetch backwards to the absolute start of the key space to
be visited by their cursor. Fetching backwards now only returns those
tuples at the start of the scan, as expected. It'll also be okay to
once again fetch forwards from the start at that point, since the scan
will be left in a state that's exactly consistent with the state it was
in before any tuples were ever fetched, as expected.
Oversight in commit 5bf748b8, which enhanced nbtree ScalarArrayOp
execution.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wznv49bFsE2jkt4GuZ0tU2C91dEST=50egzjY2FeOcHL4Q@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 17-, where commit 5bf748b8 first appears.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit a07e03fd8fa7daf4d1356f7cb501ffe784ea6257 changed inplace updates
to wait for heap_update() commands like GRANT TABLE and GRANT DATABASE.
By keeping the pin during that wait, a sequence of autovacuum workers
and an uncommitted GRANT starved one foreground LockBufferForCleanup()
for six minutes, on buildfarm member sarus. Prevent, at the cost of a
bit of complexity. Back-patch to v12, like the earlier commit. That
commit and heap_inplace_lock() have not yet appeared in any release.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20241026184936.ae.nmisch@google.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
broken by commit e18512c000e
Reported-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Tweak some code comments for clarity, and relocate some local variable
declarations to the scope where they're actually used.
Follow-up to recent commit 1bd4bc85.
|
|
|
|
| |
Oversight in commit d088ba5a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
as determined by IWYU
These are mostly issues that are new since commit dbbca2cf299.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/0df1d5b1-8ca8-4f84-93be-121081bde049%40eisentraut.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move all responsibility for indicating a block is exhuasted into
table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() and advance the main iterator in
heap-specific code. This flow control makes more sense and is a step
toward using the read stream API for bitmap heap scans.
Previously, table_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned false to indicate
table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() should not be called for the tuples on
the page. This happened both when 1) there were no visible tuples on the
page and 2) when the block returned by the iterator was past the end of
the table. BitmapHeapNext() (generic bitmap table scan code) handled the
case when the bitmap was exhausted.
It makes more sense for table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() to return false
when there are no visible tuples on the page and
table_scan_bitmap_next_block() to return false when the bitmap is
exhausted or there are no more blocks in the table.
As part of this new design, TBMIterateResults are no longer used as a
flow control mechanism in BitmapHeapNext(), so we removed
table_scan_bitmap_next_tuple's TBMIterateResult parameter.
Note that the prefetch iterator is still saved in the
BitmapHeapScanState node and advanced in generic bitmap table scan code.
This is because 1) it was not necessary to change the prefetch iterator
location to change the flow control in BitmapHeapNext() 2) modifying
prefetch iterator management requires several more steps better split
over multiple commits and 3) the prefetch iterator will be removed once
the read stream API is used.
Author: Melanie Plageman
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, Mark Dilger
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Increment the lossy and exact page counters for EXPLAIN of bitmap heap
scans in heapam_scan_bitmap_next_block(). Note that other table AMs will
need to do this as well
Pushing the counters into heapam_scan_bitmap_next_block() is required to
be able to use the read stream API for bitmap heap scans. The bitmap
iterator must be advanced from inside the read stream callback, so
TBMIterateResults cannot be used as a flow control mechanism in
BitmapHeapNext().
Author: Melanie Plageman
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Heikki Linnakangas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/063e4eb4-32d9-439e-a0b1-75565a9835a8%40iki.fi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A buffer lock won't stop a reader having already checked tuple
visibility. If a vac_update_datfrozenid() and then a crash happened
during inplace update of a relfrozenxid value, datfrozenxid could
overtake relfrozenxid. That could lead to "could not access status of
transaction" errors. Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions). In
v14 and earlier, this also back-patches the assertion removal from
commit 7fcf2faf9c7dd473208fd6d5565f88d7f733782b.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240620012908.92.nmisch@google.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The inplace update survives ROLLBACK. The inval didn't, so another
backend's DDL could then update the row without incorporating the
inplace update. In the test this fixes, a mix of CREATE INDEX and ALTER
TABLE resulted in a table with an index, yet relhasindex=f. That is a
source of index corruption. Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions).
The back branch versions don't change WAL, because those branches just
added end-of-recovery SIResetAll(). All branches change the ABI of
extern function PrepareToInvalidateCacheTuple(). No PGXN extension
calls that, and there's no apparent use case in extensions.
Reviewed by Nitin Motiani and (in earlier versions) Andres Freund.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240523000548.58.nmisch@google.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reunite RestorePendingSyncs() with RestoreRelationMap(). If
RelationInitPhysicalAddr() ran after RestoreRelationMap() but before
RestorePendingSyncs(), the relcache entry could cause RelationNeedsWAL()
to return true erroneously. Trouble required commands of the current
transaction to include REINDEX or CLUSTER of a system catalog. The
parallel leader correctly derived RelationNeedsWAL()==false from the new
relfilenumber, but the worker saw RelationNeedsWAL()==true. Worker
MarkBufferDirtyHint() then wrote unwanted WAL. Recovery of that
unwanted WAL could lose tuples like the system could before commit
c6b92041d38512a4176ed76ad06f713d2e6c01a8 introduced this tracking.
RestorePendingSyncs() and RestoreRelationMap() were adjacent till commit
126ec0bc76d044d3a9eb86538b61242bf7da6db4, so no back-patch for now.
Reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20241019232815.c6.nmisch@google.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Stop computing a never-used value. This removes the read; the read had
no functional implications. Back-patch to v12, like commit
a07e03fd8fa7daf4d1356f7cb501ffe784ea6257.
Reported by Alexander Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6c92f59b-f5bc-e58c-9bdd-d1f21c17c786@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This argument allow skipping throwing an error. Instead, the result status
can be obtained using pg_wal_replay_wait_status() function.
Catversion is bumped.
Reported-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZtUF17gF0pNpwZDI%40paquier.xyz
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, WaitForLSNReplay() immediately throws an error if waiting for LSN
replay is not successful. This commit teaches WaitForLSNReplay() to return
the result of waiting, while making pg_wal_replay_wait() responsible for
throwing an appropriate error.
This is preparation to adding 'no_error' argument to pg_wal_replay_wait() and
new function pg_wal_replay_wait_status(), which returns the last wait result
status.
Additionally, we stop distinguishing situations when we find our instance to
be not in a recovery state before entering the waiting loop and inside
the waiting loop. Standby promotion may happen at any moment, even between
issuing a procedure call statement and pg_wal_replay_wait() doing a first
check of recovery status. Thus, there is no pointing distinguishing these
situations.
Also, since we may exit the waiting loop and see our instance not in recovery
without throwing an error, we need to deleteLSNWaiter() in that case. We do
this unconditionally for the sake of simplicity, even if standby was already
promoted after reaching the target LSN, the startup process surely already
deleted us.
Reported-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZtUF17gF0pNpwZDI%40paquier.xyz
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Pavel Borisov
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reported-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZvY2C8N4ZqgCFaLu%40paquier.xyz
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
3c5db1d6b implemented the pg_wal_replay_wait() stored procedure. Due to
the patch development history, the implementation resided in
src/backend/commands/waitlsn.c (src/include/commands/waitlsn.h for headers).
014f9f34d moved pg_wal_replay_wait() itself to
src/backend/access/transam/xlogfuncs.c near to the WAL-manipulation functions.
But most of the implementation stayed in place.
The code in src/backend/commands/waitlsn.c has nothing to do with commands,
but is related to WAL. So, this commit moves this code into
src/backend/access/transam/xlogwait.c (src/include/access/xlogwait.h for
headers).
Reported-by: Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18c0fa64-0475-415e-a1bd-665d922c5201%40eisentraut.org
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, when a single relcache entry gets invalidated,
TypeCacheRelCallback() has to loop over all type cache entries to find
appropriate typentry to invalidate. Unfortunately, using the syscache here
is impossible, because this callback could be called outside a transaction
and this makes impossible catalog lookups. This is why present commit
introduces RelIdToTypeIdCacheHash to map relation OID to its composite type
OID.
We are keeping RelIdToTypeIdCacheHash entry while corresponding type cache
entry have something to clean. Therefore, RelIdToTypeIdCacheHash shouldn't
get bloat in the case of temporary tables flood.
There are many places in lookup_type_cache() where syscache invalidation,
user interruption, or even error could occur. In order to handle this, we
keep an array of in-progress type cache entries. In the case of
lookup_type_cache() interruption this array is processed to keep
RelIdToTypeIdCacheHash in a consistent state.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5812a6e5-68ae-4d84-9d85-b443176966a1%40sigaev.ru
Author: Teodor Sigaev
Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev, Tom Lane, Michael Paquier, Roman Zharkov
Reviewed-by: Andrei Lepikhov, Pavel Borisov, Jian He, Alexander Lakhin
Reviewed-by: Artur Zakirov
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make nbtree backwards scans optimistically access the next page to be
read to the left by following a prevPage block number that's now stashed
in currPos when the leaf page is first read. This approach matches the
one taken during forward scans, which follow a symmetric nextPage block
number from currPos. We stash both a prevPage and a nextPage, since the
scan direction might change (when fetching from a scrollable cursor).
Backwards scans will no longer need to lock the same page twice, except
in rare cases where the scan detects a concurrent page split (or page
deletion). Testing has shown this optimization to be particularly
effective during parallel index-only backwards scans: ~12% reductions in
query execution time are quite possible.
We're much better off being optimistic; concurrent left sibling page
splits are rare in general. It's possible that we'll need to lock more
pages than the pessimistic approach would have, but only when there are
_multiple_ concurrent splits of the left sibling page we now start at.
If there's just a single concurrent left sibling page split, the new
approach to scanning backwards will at least break even relative to the
old one (we'll acquire the same number of leaf page locks as before).
The optimization from this commit has long been contemplated by comments
added by commit 2ed5b87f96, which changed the rules for locking/pinning
during nbtree index scans. The approach that that commit introduced to
leaf level link traversal when scanning forwards is now more or less
applied all the time, regardless of the direction we're scanning in.
Following uniform conventions around sibling link traversal is simpler.
The only real remaining difference between our forward and backwards
handling is that our backwards handling must still detect and recover
from any concurrent left sibling splits (and concurrent page deletions),
as documented in the nbtree README. That is structured as a single,
isolated extra step that takes place in _bt_readnextpage.
Also use this opportunity to further simplify the functions that deal
with reading pages and traversing sibling links on the leaf level, and
to document their preconditions and postconditions (with respect to
things like buffer locks, buffer pins, and seizing the parallel scan).
This enhancement completely supersedes the one recently added by commit
3f44959f.
Author: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEze2WgpBGRgTTxTWVPXc9+PB6fc1a7t+VyGXHzfnrFXcQVxnA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkBTuFv7W2+84jJT8mWZLXVL0GHq2hMUTn6c9Vw=eYrCw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 3bf3ab8c56 initially introduced support for unlogged
materialized views, but this was later disallowed by commit 3223b25ff7.
Additionally, commit d25f519107 added more code for handling
unlogged materialized views. This commit cleans up all unused
code related to them.
If unlogged materialized views had been supported in any official
release, psql would need to retain code to handle them for compatibility
with older servers. However, since they were never included in
an official release, this code is no longer necessary.
Author: Pixian Shi
Reviewed-by: Yugo Nagata, Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAccyYKRZ=OvAvgowiSH+OELbStLP=p2Ht=R3CgT=OaNSH5DAA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
| |
Oversight in commit 79fa7b3b.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 5bf748b8 taught nbtree ScalarArrayOp index scans to decide when
and how to start the next primitive index scan based on physical index
characteristics. This included rules for deciding whether to start a
new primitive index scan (or whether to move onto the right sibling leaf
page instead) that specifically consider truncated lower-order columns
(-inf columns) from leaf page high keys.
These omitted columns were treated as satisfying the scan's required
scan keys, though only for scan keys marked required in the current scan
direction (forward). Scan keys that didn't get this behavior (those
marked required in the backwards direction only) usually didn't give the
scan reasonable cause to reposition itself to a later leaf page (via
another descent of the index in _bt_first), but _bt_advance_array_keys
would nevertheless always give up by forcing another call to _bt_first.
_bt_advance_array_keys was unwilling to allow the scan to continue onto
the next leaf page, to reconsider whether we really should start another
primitive scan based on the details of the sibling page's tuples. This
didn't match its behavior with similar cases involving keys required in
the current scan direction (forward), which seems unprincipled. It led
to an excessive number of primitive scans/index descents for queries
with a higher-order = array scan key (with dense, contiguous values)
mixed with a lower-order required > or >= scan key.
Bring > and >= strategy scan keys in line with other required scan key
types: treat truncated -inf scan keys as having satisfied scan keys
required in either scan direction (forwards and backwards alike) during
array advancement. That way affected scans can continue to the right
sibling leaf page. Advancement must now schedule an explicit recheck of
the right sibling page's high key in cases involving > or >= scan keys.
The recheck gives the scan a way to back out and start another primitive
index scan (we can't just rely on _bt_checkkeys with > or >= scan keys).
This work can be considered a stand alone optimization on top of the
work from commit 5bf748b8. But it was written in preparation for an
upcoming patch that will add skip scan to nbtree. In practice scans
that use "skip arrays" will tend to be much more sensitive to any
implementation deficiencies in this area.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=9A_UtM7HzUThSkQ+BcrQsQZuNhWOvQWK06PRkEp=SKQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
During logical decoding of in-progress transactions, we perform the toast
table scan while fetching the default toast value for an attribute. We
forgot to initialize the flag during this scan to indicate that the system
table scan is in progress. We need this flag to ensure that during logical
decoding we never directly access the tableam or heap APIs because we check
for concurrent aborts only in systable_* APIs.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Author: Takeshi Ideriha, Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Hou Zhijie
Backpatch-through: 14
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18641-6687273b7f15269d@postgresql.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the PostgreSQL C type naming schema, the type PageData should be
what the pointer of type Page points to. But in this case it's
actually an unrelated type local to generic_xlog.c. Rename that to a
more specific name. This makes room to possible add a PageData type
with the mentioned meaning, but this is not done here.
Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/001d457e-c118-4219-8132-e1846c2ae3c9%40eisentraut.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, the pg_stat_checkpointer view and the checkpoint completion
log message could show different numbers for buffers written
during checkpoints. The view only counted shared buffers,
while the log message included both shared and SLRU buffers,
causing inconsistencies.
This commit resolves the issue by updating both the view and the log message
to separately report shared and SLRU buffers written during checkpoints.
A new slru_written column is added to the pg_stat_checkpointer view
to track SLRU buffers, while the existing buffers_written column now
tracks only shared buffers. This change would help users distinguish
between the two types of buffers, in the pg_stat_checkpointer view and
the checkpoint complete log message, respectively.
Bump catalog version.
Author: Nitin Jadhav
Reviewed-by: Bharath Rupireddy, Michael Paquier, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Robert Haas
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, vignesh C, Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMm1aWb18EpT0whJrjG+-nyhNouXET6ZUw0pNYYAe+NezpvsAA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
COMMIT PREPARED removes on-disk 2PC files near its end, but the state
checked if a file is on-disk or not gets read from shared memory while
not holding the two-phase state lock.
Because of that, there was a small window where a second backend doing a
PREPARE TRANSACTION could reuse the GlobalTransaction put back into the
2PC free list by the COMMIT PREPARED, overwriting the "ondisk" flag read
afterwards by the COMMIT PREPARED to decide if its on-disk two-phase
state file should be removed, preventing the file deletion.
This commit fixes this issue so as the "ondisk" flag in the
GlobalTransaction is read while holding the two-phase state lock, not
from shared memory after its entry has been added to the free list.
Orphaned two-phase state files flushed to disk after a checkpoint are
discarded at the beginning of recovery. However, a truncation of
pg_xact/ would make the startup process issue a FATAL when it cannot
read the SLRU page holding the state of the transaction whose 2PC file
was orphaned, which is a necessary step to decide if the 2PC file should
be removed or not. Removing manually the file would be necessary in
this case.
Issue introduced by effe7d9552dd, so backpatch all the way down.
Mea culpa.
Author: wuchengwen
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/tencent_A7F059B5136A359625C7B2E4A386B3C3F007@qq.com
Backpatch-through: 12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Checkpoints can be skipped when the server is idle. The existing num_timed and
num_requested counters in pg_stat_checkpointer track both completed and
skipped checkpoints, but there was no way to count only the completed ones.
This commit introduces the num_done counter, which tracks only completed
checkpoints, making it easier to see how many were actually performed.
Bump catalog version.
Author: Anton A. Melnikov
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9ea77f40-818d-4841-9dee-158ac8f6e690@oss.nttdata.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All these code paths use their own entry point when starting parallel
workers, but failed to set a query ID, even if they set a text query.
Hence, this data would be missed in pg_stat_activity for the worker
processes. The main entry point for parallel query processing,
ParallelQueryMain(), is already doing that by saving its query ID in a
dummy PlannedStmt, but not the others. The code is changed so as the
query ID of these queries is set in their shared state, and reported
back once the parallel workers start.
Some tests are added to show how the failures can happen for btree and
BRIN with a parallel build enforced, which are able to trigger a failure
in an assertion added by 24f520594809 in the recovery TAP test
027_stream_regress.pl where pg_stat_statements is always loaded. In
this case, the executor path was taken because the index expression
needs to be flattened when building its IndexInfo.
Alexander Lakhin has noticed the problem in btree, and I have noticed
that the issue was more spread. This is arguably a bug, but nobody has
complained about that until now, so no backpatch is done out of caution.
If folks would like to see a backpatch, well, let me know.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Reviewed-by: Sami Imseih
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cf3547c1-498a-6a61-7b01-819f902a251f@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The previous commit fixed some ways of losing an inplace update. It
remained possible to lose one when a backend working toward a
heap_update() copied a tuple into memory just before inplace update of
that tuple. In catalogs eligible for inplace update, use LOCKTAG_TUPLE
to govern admission to the steps of copying an old tuple, modifying it,
and issuing heap_update(). This includes MERGE commands. To avoid
changing most of the pg_class DDL, don't require LOCKTAG_TUPLE when
holding a relation lock sufficient to exclude inplace updaters.
Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions). In v13 and v12, "UPDATE
pg_class" or "UPDATE pg_database" can still lose an inplace update. The
v14+ UPDATE fix needs commit 86dc90056dfdbd9d1b891718d2e5614e3e432f35,
and it wasn't worth reimplementing that fix without such infrastructure.
Reviewed by Nitin Motiani and (in earlier versions) Heikki Linnakangas.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231027214946.79.nmisch@google.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As previously-added tests demonstrated, heap_inplace_update() could
instead update an unrelated tuple of the same catalog. It could lose
the update. Losing relhasindex=t was a source of index corruption.
Inplace-updating commands like VACUUM will now wait for heap_update()
commands like GRANT TABLE and GRANT DATABASE. That isn't ideal, but a
long-running GRANT already hurts VACUUM progress more just by keeping an
XID running. The VACUUM will behave like a DELETE or UPDATE waiting for
the uncommitted change.
For implementation details, start at the systable_inplace_update_begin()
header comment and README.tuplock. Back-patch to v12 (all supported
versions). In back branches, retain a deprecated heap_inplace_update(),
for extensions.
Reported by Smolkin Grigory. Reviewed by Nitin Motiani, (in earlier
versions) Heikki Linnakangas, and (in earlier versions) Alexander
Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMp+ueZQz3yDk7qg42hk6-9gxniYbp-=bG2mgqecErqR5gGGOA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The array->scan_key references fixed up at the end of preprocessing
start out as offsets into the arrayKeyData[] array (the array returned
by _bt_preprocess_array_keys at the start of preprocessing that involves
array scan keys). Offsets into the arrayKeyData[] array are no longer
guaranteed to be valid offsets into our original scan->keyData[] input
scan key array, but comments describing the array->scan_key references
still talked about scan->keyData[]. Update those comments.
Oversight in commit b5249741.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Teach _bt_preprocess_array_keys to eliminate redundant array equality
scan keys directly, rather than just marking them as redundant. Its
_bt_preprocess_keys caller is no longer required to ignore input scan
keys that were marked redundant in this way. Oversights like the one
fixed by commit f22e17f7 are no longer possible.
The new scheme also makes it easier for _bt_preprocess_keys to output a
so.keyData[] scan key array with _more_ scan keys than it was passed in
its scan.keyData[] input scan key array. An upcoming patch that adds
skip scan optimizations to nbtree will take advantage of this.
In passing, remove and rename certain _bt_preprocess_keys variables to
make the difference between our input scan key array and our output scan
key array clearer.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=9A_UtM7HzUThSkQ+BcrQsQZuNhWOvQWK06PRkEp=SKQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
table_beginscan_parallel and index_beginscan_parallel contain
Asserts checking that the relation a worker will use in
a parallel scan is the same one the leader intended. However,
they were checking for relation OID match, which was not strong
enough to detect the mismatch problem fixed in 126ec0bc7.
What would be strong enough is to compare relfilenodes instead.
Arguably, that's a saner definition anyway, since a scan surely
operates on a physical relation not a logical one. Hence,
store and compare RelFileLocators not relation OIDs. Also
ensure that index_beginscan_parallel checks the index identity
not just the table identity.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2127254.1726789524@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 5bf748b8, which enhanced nbtree ScalarArrayOp execution, made
parallel index scans work with the new design for arrays via explicit
scheduling of primitive index scans. Under this scheme a parallel index
scan with array keys will perform the same number of index descents as
an equivalent serial index scan (barring corner cases where an
individual parallel worker discovers that it can advance the scan's
array keys without anybody needing to perform another descent of the
index to get to the relevant page on the leaf level).
Despite all this, the pgstats accounting wasn't updated; it continued to
increment the total number of index scans for the rel once per _bt_first
call, no matter the details. As a result, the number of (primitive)
index scans could be over-counted during parallel scans.
To fix, delay incrementing the count of index scans until after we've
established that another descent of the index (using either _bt_search
or _bt_endpoint) is required. That way pg_stat_user_tables.idx_scan
always advances in the same way, regardless of whether or not the scan
makes use of parallelism.
Oversight in commit 5bf748b8, which enhanced nbtree ScalarArrayOp
execution.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=E7XrkvscBN0U6V81NK3Q-dQOmivvbEsjG-zwEfDdFpg@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkRqvaqR2CTNqTZP0z6FuL4-3ED6eQB0yx38XBNj1v-4Q@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 17-, where nbtree SAOP execution was enhanced.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We need to do RestoreRelationMap before loading catalog-derived
state, else the worker may end up with catalog relcache entries
containing stale relfilenode data. Move up RestoreReindexState
too, on the principle that that should also happen before we
do much of any catalog access.
I think ideally these things would happen even before InitPostgres,
but there are various problems standing in the way of that, notably
that the relmapper thinks "active" mappings should be discarded at
transaction end. The implication of this is that InitPostgres and
RestoreLibraryState will see the same catalog state as an independent
backend would see, which is probably fine; at least, it's been like
that all along.
Per report from Justin Pryzby. There is a case to be made that
this should be back-patched. But given the lack of complaints
before 6e086fa2e and the short amount of time remaining before
17.0 wraps, I'll just put it in HEAD for now.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZuoU_8EbSTE14o1U@pryzbyj2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit moves pg_wal_replay_wait() procedure to be a neighbor of
WAL-related functions in xlogfuncs.c. The implementation of LSN waiting
continues to reside in the same place.
By proposal from Michael Paquier.
Reported-by: Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18c0fa64-0475-415e-a1bd-665d922c5201%40eisentraut.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This opens the possibility to define keys for more types of statistics
kinds in PgStat_HashKey, the first case being 8-byte query IDs for
statistics like pg_stat_statements.
This increases the size of PgStat_HashKey from 12 to 16 bytes, while
PgStatShared_HashEntry, entry stored in the dshash for pgstats, keeps
the same size due to alignment.
xl_xact_stats_item, that tracks the stats items to drop in commit WAL
records, is increased from 12 to 16 bytes. Note that individual chunks
in commit WAL records should be multiples of sizeof(int), hence 8-byte
object IDs are stored as two uint32, based on a suggestion from Heikki
Linnakangas.
While on it, the field of PgStat_HashKey is renamed from "objoid" to
"objid", as for some stats kinds this field does not refer to OIDs but
just IDs, like for replication slot stats.
This commit bumps the following format variables:
- PGSTAT_FILE_FORMAT_ID, as PgStat_HashKey is written to the stats file
for non-serialized stats kinds in the dshash table.
- XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC for the changes in xl_xact_stats_item.
- Catalog version, for the SQL function pg_stat_have_stats().
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZsvTS9EW79Up8I62@paquier.xyz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Rename $node_standby1 to $node_standby in 043_wal_replay_wait.pl as there
is only one standby.
* Remove useless debug printing in 043_wal_replay_wait.pl.
* Fix typo in one check description in 043_wal_replay_wait.pl.
* Fix some wording in comments and documentation.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1d7b08f2-64a2-77fb-c666-c9a74c68eeda%40gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 5bf748b8, which enhanced nbtree ScalarArrayOp execution, made
parallel index scans work with the new design for arrays via explicit
scheduling of primitive index scans. A backend that successfully
scheduled the scan's next primitive index scan saved its backend local
array keys in shared memory. Any backend could pick up the scheduled
primitive scan within _bt_first. This scheme decouples scheduling a
primitive scan from starting the scan (by performing another descent of
the index via a _bt_search call from _bt_first) to make things robust.
The scheme had a deadlock hazard, at least when the leader process
participated in the scan. _bt_parallel_seize had a code path that made
backends that were not in an immediate position to start a scheduled
primitive index scan wait for some other backend to do so instead.
Under the right circumstances, the leader process could wait here
forever: the leader would wait for any other backend to start the
primitive scan, while every worker was busy waiting on the leader to
consume tuples from the scan's tuple queue.
To fix, don't wait for a scheduled primitive index scan to be started by
some other eligible backend from within _bt_parallel_seize (when the
calling backend isn't in a position to do so itself). Return false
instead, while recording that the scan has a scheduled primitive index
scan in backend local state. This leaves the backend in the same state
as the existing case where a backend schedules (or tries to schedule)
another primitive index scan from within _bt_advance_array_keys, before
calling _bt_parallel_seize. _bt_parallel_seize already handles that
case by returning false without waiting, and without unsetting the
backend local state. Leaving the backend in this state enables it to
start a previously scheduled primitive index scan once it gets back to
_bt_first.
Oversight in commit 5bf748b8, which enhanced nbtree ScalarArrayOp
execution.
Matthias van de Meent, with tweaks by me.
Author: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Reported-By: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
Reviewed-By: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzmMGaPa32u9x_FvEbPTUkP5e95i=QxR8054nvCRydP-sw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 17-, where nbtree SAOP execution was enhanced.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add WITHOUT OVERLAPS clause to PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints.
These are backed by GiST indexes instead of B-tree indexes, since they
are essentially exclusion constraints with = for the scalar parts of
the key and && for the temporal part.
(previously committed as 46a0cd4cefb, reverted by 46a0cd4cefb; the new
part is this:)
Because 'empty' && 'empty' is false, the temporal PK/UQ constraint
allowed duplicates, which is confusing to users and breaks internal
expectations. For instance, when GROUP BY checks functional
dependencies on the PK, it allows selecting other columns from the
table, but in the presence of duplicate keys you could get the value
from any of their rows. So we need to forbid empties.
This all means that at the moment we can only support ranges and
multiranges for temporal PK/UQs, unlike the original patch (above).
Documentation and tests for this are added. But this could
conceivably be extended by introducing some more general support for
the notion of "empty" for other types.
Author: Paul A. Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Reviewed-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA+renyUApHgSZF9-nd-a0+OPGharLQLO=mDHcY4_qQ0+noCUVg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is support function 12 for the GiST AM and translates
"well-known" RT*StrategyNumber values into whatever strategy number is
used by the opclass (since no particular numbers are actually
required). We will use this to support temporal PRIMARY
KEY/UNIQUE/FOREIGN KEY/FOR PORTION OF functionality.
This commit adds two implementations, one for internal GiST opclasses
(just an identity function) and another for btree_gist opclasses. It
updates btree_gist from 1.7 to 1.8, adding the support function for
all its opclasses.
(previously committed as 6db4598fcb8, reverted by 8aee330af55; this is
essentially unchanged from those)
Author: Paul A. Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Reviewed-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA+renyUApHgSZF9-nd-a0+OPGharLQLO=mDHcY4_qQ0+noCUVg@mail.gmail.com
|