aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/access/spgist
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/access/spgist')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/access/spgist/spgscan.c18
-rw-r--r--src/backend/access/spgist/spgtextproc.c4
-rw-r--r--src/backend/access/spgist/spgvacuum.c6
3 files changed, 14 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/access/spgist/spgscan.c b/src/backend/access/spgist/spgscan.c
index 9365bc57ad5..7bc5ec09bf9 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/spgist/spgscan.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/spgist/spgscan.c
@@ -39,8 +39,8 @@ static int
pairingheap_SpGistSearchItem_cmp(const pairingheap_node *a,
const pairingheap_node *b, void *arg)
{
- const SpGistSearchItem *sa = (const SpGistSearchItem *) a;
- const SpGistSearchItem *sb = (const SpGistSearchItem *) b;
+ const SpGistSearchItem *sa = (const SpGistSearchItem *) a;
+ const SpGistSearchItem *sb = (const SpGistSearchItem *) b;
SpGistScanOpaque so = (SpGistScanOpaque) arg;
int i;
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ pairingheap_SpGistSearchItem_cmp(const pairingheap_node *a,
}
static void
-spgFreeSearchItem(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem * item)
+spgFreeSearchItem(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem *item)
{
if (!so->state.attLeafType.attbyval &&
DatumGetPointer(item->value) != NULL)
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ spgFreeSearchItem(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem * item)
* Called in queue context
*/
static void
-spgAddSearchItemToQueue(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem * item)
+spgAddSearchItemToQueue(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem *item)
{
pairingheap_add(so->scanQueue, &item->phNode);
}
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ spgNewHeapItem(SpGistScanOpaque so, int level, ItemPointer heapPtr,
* the scan is not ordered AND the item satisfies the scankeys
*/
static bool
-spgLeafTest(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem * item,
+spgLeafTest(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem *item,
SpGistLeafTuple leafTuple, bool isnull,
bool *reportedSome, storeRes_func storeRes)
{
@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ spgLeafTest(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem * item,
static void
spgInitInnerConsistentIn(spgInnerConsistentIn *in,
SpGistScanOpaque so,
- SpGistSearchItem * item,
+ SpGistSearchItem *item,
SpGistInnerTuple innerTuple)
{
in->scankeys = so->keyData;
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ spgInitInnerConsistentIn(spgInnerConsistentIn *in,
static SpGistSearchItem *
spgMakeInnerItem(SpGistScanOpaque so,
- SpGistSearchItem * parentItem,
+ SpGistSearchItem *parentItem,
SpGistNodeTuple tuple,
spgInnerConsistentOut *out, int i, bool isnull,
double *distances)
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ spgMakeInnerItem(SpGistScanOpaque so,
}
static void
-spgInnerTest(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem * item,
+spgInnerTest(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem *item,
SpGistInnerTuple innerTuple, bool isnull)
{
MemoryContext oldCxt = MemoryContextSwitchTo(so->tempCxt);
@@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ enum SpGistSpecialOffsetNumbers
static OffsetNumber
spgTestLeafTuple(SpGistScanOpaque so,
- SpGistSearchItem * item,
+ SpGistSearchItem *item,
Page page, OffsetNumber offset,
bool isnull, bool isroot,
bool *reportedSome,
diff --git a/src/backend/access/spgist/spgtextproc.c b/src/backend/access/spgist/spgtextproc.c
index d22998c54bf..a7c1a09e05f 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/spgist/spgtextproc.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/spgist/spgtextproc.c
@@ -632,8 +632,8 @@ spg_text_leaf_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
res = (level >= queryLen) ||
DatumGetBool(DirectFunctionCall2Coll(text_starts_with,
PG_GET_COLLATION(),
- out->leafValue,
- PointerGetDatum(query)));
+ out->leafValue,
+ PointerGetDatum(query)));
if (!res) /* no need to consider remaining conditions */
break;
diff --git a/src/backend/access/spgist/spgvacuum.c b/src/backend/access/spgist/spgvacuum.c
index fc85c6f9407..2b1662a267d 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/spgist/spgvacuum.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/spgist/spgvacuum.c
@@ -192,9 +192,9 @@ vacuumLeafPage(spgBulkDeleteState *bds, Relation index, Buffer buffer,
* happened since VACUUM started.
*
* Note: we could make a tighter test by seeing if the xid is
- * "running" according to the active snapshot; but snapmgr.c doesn't
- * currently export a suitable API, and it's not entirely clear
- * that a tighter test is worth the cycles anyway.
+ * "running" according to the active snapshot; but snapmgr.c
+ * doesn't currently export a suitable API, and it's not entirely
+ * clear that a tighter test is worth the cycles anyway.
*/
if (TransactionIdFollowsOrEquals(dt->xid, bds->myXmin))
spgAddPendingTID(bds, &dt->pointer);