The mtx->wait counter was not decremented if we were able to obtain the lock
right after incrementing it. This resulted in unneeded sem_post() calls,
eventually leading to EOVERFLOW errors being logged, "sem_post() failed
while wake shmtx (75: Value too large for defined data type)".
To close the race, mtx->wait is now decremented if we obtain the lock right
after incrementing it in ngx_shmtx_lock(). The result can become -1 if a
concurrent ngx_shmtx_unlock() decrements mtx->wait before the added code does.
However, that only leads to one extra iteration in the next call of
ngx_shmtx_lock().
(void) ngx_atomic_fetch_add(mtx->wait, 1);
if (*mtx->lock == 0 && ngx_atomic_cmp_set(mtx->lock, 0, ngx_pid)) {
+ (void) ngx_atomic_fetch_add(mtx->wait, -1);
return;
}
wait = *mtx->wait;
- if (wait == 0) {
+ if ((ngx_atomic_int_t) wait <= 0) {
return;
}