diff options
author | Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> | 2019-07-04 16:08:09 +0900 |
---|---|---|
committer | Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> | 2019-07-04 16:08:09 +0900 |
commit | cfc40d384ae51ea2886d599d2008ae57b529e6ea (patch) | |
tree | 725bf1bb55c99ead091f16ff9ccfc542ef7a2855 /src/common/scram-common.c | |
parent | d5ab9a891cb590aad4278026b2edda685f2524a2 (diff) | |
download | postgresql-cfc40d384ae51ea2886d599d2008ae57b529e6ea.tar.gz postgresql-cfc40d384ae51ea2886d599d2008ae57b529e6ea.zip |
Introduce safer encoding and decoding routines for base64.c
This is a follow-up refactoring after 09ec55b and b674211, which has
proved that the encoding and decoding routines used by SCRAM have a
poor interface when it comes to check after buffer overflows. This adds
an extra argument in the shape of the length of the result buffer for
each routine, which is used for overflow checks when encoding or
decoding an input string. The original idea comes from Tom Lane.
As a result of that, the encoding routine can now fail, so all its
callers are adjusted to generate proper error messages in case of
problems.
On failure, the result buffer gets zeroed.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190623132535.GB1628@paquier.xyz
Diffstat (limited to 'src/common/scram-common.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/common/scram-common.c | 59 |
1 files changed, 53 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/src/common/scram-common.c b/src/common/scram-common.c index c30dfc97dca..dff9723e67f 100644 --- a/src/common/scram-common.c +++ b/src/common/scram-common.c @@ -198,6 +198,10 @@ scram_build_verifier(const char *salt, int saltlen, int iterations, char *result; char *p; int maxlen; + int encoded_salt_len; + int encoded_stored_len; + int encoded_server_len; + int encoded_result; if (iterations <= 0) iterations = SCRAM_DEFAULT_ITERATIONS; @@ -215,11 +219,15 @@ scram_build_verifier(const char *salt, int saltlen, int iterations, * SCRAM-SHA-256$<iteration count>:<salt>$<StoredKey>:<ServerKey> *---------- */ + encoded_salt_len = pg_b64_enc_len(saltlen); + encoded_stored_len = pg_b64_enc_len(SCRAM_KEY_LEN); + encoded_server_len = pg_b64_enc_len(SCRAM_KEY_LEN); + maxlen = strlen("SCRAM-SHA-256") + 1 + 10 + 1 /* iteration count */ - + pg_b64_enc_len(saltlen) + 1 /* Base64-encoded salt */ - + pg_b64_enc_len(SCRAM_KEY_LEN) + 1 /* Base64-encoded StoredKey */ - + pg_b64_enc_len(SCRAM_KEY_LEN) + 1; /* Base64-encoded ServerKey */ + + encoded_salt_len + 1 /* Base64-encoded salt */ + + encoded_stored_len + 1 /* Base64-encoded StoredKey */ + + encoded_server_len + 1; /* Base64-encoded ServerKey */ #ifdef FRONTEND result = malloc(maxlen); @@ -231,11 +239,50 @@ scram_build_verifier(const char *salt, int saltlen, int iterations, p = result + sprintf(result, "SCRAM-SHA-256$%d:", iterations); - p += pg_b64_encode(salt, saltlen, p); + /* salt */ + encoded_result = pg_b64_encode(salt, saltlen, p, encoded_salt_len); + if (encoded_result < 0) + { +#ifdef FRONTEND + free(result); + return NULL; +#else + elog(ERROR, "could not encode salt"); +#endif + } + p += encoded_result; *(p++) = '$'; - p += pg_b64_encode((char *) stored_key, SCRAM_KEY_LEN, p); + + /* stored key */ + encoded_result = pg_b64_encode((char *) stored_key, SCRAM_KEY_LEN, p, + encoded_stored_len); + if (encoded_result < 0) + { +#ifdef FRONTEND + free(result); + return NULL; +#else + elog(ERROR, "could not encode stored key"); +#endif + } + + p += encoded_result; *(p++) = ':'; - p += pg_b64_encode((char *) server_key, SCRAM_KEY_LEN, p); + + /* server key */ + encoded_result = pg_b64_encode((char *) server_key, SCRAM_KEY_LEN, p, + encoded_server_len); + if (encoded_result < 0) + { +#ifdef FRONTEND + free(result); + return NULL; +#else + elog(ERROR, "could not encode server key"); +#endif + } + + p += encoded_result; *(p++) = '\0'; Assert(p - result <= maxlen); |