aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2001-07-31 20:16:33 +0000
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2001-07-31 20:16:33 +0000
commit0889bd00bd365ca252d75118378171fe5fd48289 (patch)
treed027d973d075674f6c1428c5bbc147e81ea9aab8
parent421467cdc8231a9da7ae6116ce6030d7d756f137 (diff)
downloadpostgresql-0889bd00bd365ca252d75118378171fe5fd48289.tar.gz
postgresql-0889bd00bd365ca252d75118378171fe5fd48289.zip
Further thought shows that has_distinct_on_clause() needs to take much
more care with resjunk tlist entries than it was doing. The original coding ignored resjunk entries entirely, but a resjunk entry that is in either the distinctClause or sortClause lists indicates that DISTINCT ON was used. It's important for ruleutils.c to get this right, else we may dump views using DISTINCT ON incorrectly.
-rw-r--r--src/backend/optimizer/util/clauses.c69
1 files changed, 52 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/clauses.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/clauses.c
index 5bb850e0da2..0bf06c52867 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/clauses.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/clauses.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
- * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/util/clauses.c,v 1.87 2001/07/31 17:56:31 tgl Exp $
+ * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/util/clauses.c,v 1.88 2001/07/31 20:16:33 tgl Exp $
*
* HISTORY
* AUTHOR DATE MAJOR EVENT
@@ -737,8 +737,30 @@ pull_constant_clauses(List *quals, List **constantQual)
*****************************************************************************/
/*
+ * Test whether a sort/group reference value appears in the given list of
+ * SortClause (or GroupClause) nodes.
+ *
+ * Because GroupClause is typedef'd as SortClause, either kind of
+ * node list can be passed without casting.
+ */
+static bool
+sortgroupref_is_present(Index sortgroupref, List *clauselist)
+{
+ List *clause;
+
+ foreach(clause, clauselist)
+ {
+ SortClause *scl = (SortClause *) lfirst(clause);
+
+ if (scl->tleSortGroupRef == sortgroupref)
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+/*
* Test whether a query uses DISTINCT ON, ie, has a distinct-list that is
- * just a subset of the output columns.
+ * not the same as the set of output columns.
*/
bool
has_distinct_on_clause(Query *query)
@@ -750,30 +772,43 @@ has_distinct_on_clause(Query *query)
return false;
/*
* If the DISTINCT list contains all the nonjunk targetlist items,
- * then it's a simple DISTINCT, else it's DISTINCT ON. We do not
- * require the lists to be in the same order (since the parser may
- * have adjusted the DISTINCT clause ordering to agree with ORDER BY).
+ * and nothing else (ie, no junk tlist items), then it's a simple
+ * DISTINCT, else it's DISTINCT ON. We do not require the lists to be
+ * in the same order (since the parser may have adjusted the DISTINCT
+ * clause ordering to agree with ORDER BY). Furthermore, a non-DISTINCT
+ * junk tlist item that is in the sortClause is also evidence of
+ * DISTINCT ON, since we don't allow ORDER BY on junk tlist items when
+ * plain DISTINCT is used.
+ *
+ * This code assumes that the DISTINCT list is valid, ie, all its entries
+ * match some entry of the tlist.
*/
foreach(targetList, query->targetList)
{
TargetEntry *tle = (TargetEntry *) lfirst(targetList);
- Index ressortgroupref;
- List *distinctClause;
+ Index ressortgroupref = tle->resdom->ressortgroupref;
- if (tle->resdom->resjunk)
- continue;
- ressortgroupref = tle->resdom->ressortgroupref;
if (ressortgroupref == 0)
+ {
+ if (tle->resdom->resjunk)
+ continue; /* we can ignore unsorted junk cols */
return true; /* definitely not in DISTINCT list */
- foreach(distinctClause, query->distinctClause)
+ }
+ if (sortgroupref_is_present(ressortgroupref, query->distinctClause))
{
- SortClause *scl = (SortClause *) lfirst(distinctClause);
-
- if (scl->tleSortGroupRef == ressortgroupref)
- break; /* found TLE in DISTINCT */
+ if (tle->resdom->resjunk)
+ return true; /* junk TLE in DISTINCT means DISTINCT ON */
+ /* else this TLE is okay, keep looking */
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* This TLE is not in DISTINCT list */
+ if (!tle->resdom->resjunk)
+ return true; /* non-junk, non-DISTINCT, so DISTINCT ON */
+ if (sortgroupref_is_present(ressortgroupref, query->sortClause))
+ return true; /* sorted, non-distinct junk */
+ /* unsorted junk is okay, keep looking */
}
- if (distinctClause == NIL)
- return true; /* this TLE is not in DISTINCT list */
}
/* It's a simple DISTINCT */
return false;