From 2246bbb7a8a5746c07799bd754a8f22ad358d8d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel John Keefer <xxkeefer.code@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 19:49:55 +1000
Subject: refactor: Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Louis Pilfold <louis@lpil.uk>
---
 .../chapter3_data_types/lesson04_record_pattern_matching/en.html    | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/content/chapter3_data_types/lesson04_record_pattern_matching/en.html b/src/content/chapter3_data_types/lesson04_record_pattern_matching/en.html
index 2c0c2fa..3c09080 100644
--- a/src/content/chapter3_data_types/lesson04_record_pattern_matching/en.html
+++ b/src/content/chapter3_data_types/lesson04_record_pattern_matching/en.html
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 <p>
   It is possible to pattern match on a record, this allows for the extraction 
-  of multiple field values from a record into distinct variables in a concise and efficient way.
+  of multiple field values from a record into distinct variables, similar to matching on a tuple or a list.
 </p>
 <p>
-  the let key word can only match on single variant custom types. For types with more variants 
-  a case statement must be used.
+  The let key word can only match on single variant custom types. For types with more variants 
+  a case expression must be used.
 </p>
 <p>
   It is possible to use underscore <code>_</code> or the spread syntax <code>..</code> to 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3